Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

La Jornada (Mexico): Bush plans for GLOBAL POLICE STATE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:11 PM
Original message
La Jornada (Mexico): Bush plans for GLOBAL POLICE STATE
"The White House is making a great effort to spread to the rest of the world an extension of police and military power."

Having been taken advantage of by Bush in the name of “national security,” a painful series of events has driven the judiciary and police, in view of the 9-11 attacks and the resulting worldwide indignation, to countenance a resurgence of the intelligence agencies in the United States. This has created a dictatorial climate of political harassment that recalls the McCarthyism that afflicted that nation after World War II.

Greenpeace and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), groups that champion civil rights, accuse FBI officials of using the powers of the Patriot Act "to erase the border that separates legitimate activities of civil disobedience from terrorist activities, in an attempt to repress political opposition" (La Jornada, 7/19/05). This is part of a systematic erosion of the Constitution and the establishment of a state of emergency, giving the police and military exceptional powers under that "Act", many clauses of which were set to expire this year. But Bush, taking advantage of the 7-7 attacks in Britain, has sought to make them "permanent."

http://www.watchingamerica.com/lajornada000011.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just a note
La Jornada (even if they are accurate) is a left of center paper... and when readying we always have to make sure about the aparent biases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Well, these days...
... with the so-called liberal newspaper "of record" afraid to challenge Bush through most of his first term, and pasting up lies on its front pages promoting an illegal war, along with the overall conservatism of the remainder of the print press in this country, perhaps the perceived need to identify "La Jornada" as left-of-center and to warn of its apparent bias is unwarranted. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. "left of center"
God forbid we should read anything left of center, by Golly it could contain some truth in it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Did not say that
but we all need to be aware of what or where we are readying

We all are aware of where the Independent and the Guardian stand (slightly right of cetner and sligttly left of center) for teh UK Press, but this was more of a PSA of where this paper is

If this was Excelsion, I woudl have told you, right of center, in fact quite right of center
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Point well taken
I think it was pretty obvious from their slant in which direction they were leaning though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know we are all practiced at this
but some folks are not... and I grew up down there, so I know the papers still
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. 7/7 and now 7/21 and the renewal of the Patriot Act make it real hard
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 06:15 PM by Gman
to just call MIHOP tinfoil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lady lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm with you, Gman.
There is NO tinfoil to 9/11 MIHOP. None. Nada. Somehow the American public is going to have to wake up and wrap it's collective brain around that one. Good luck!

And while we don't have all the information on 7/7 yet, I wouldn't be surprised if that one was an inside job as well. NYT article today talks about the British police changing the timeline and changing their story about the type of explosives - first they were military grade and now they're not. And how convenient that 7/7 was used by the House to push through the Patriot Act renewal. How f***ing convenient for them.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The clincher for me was the P2/Gladio crud in Italy
Basically, they've done it in Italy, so there's nothing stopping them from doing it at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well duh
So what else is new. Listen to JP Morgan Chase whistleblower Indira Singh here, it's an absolute must-hear:
http://www.kpfa.org/archives/archives.php?id=13&limit=N

What is being planned by the centres of power in the US is going to "make the third reich look like a tea party".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC