|
Is that with most of the voting machines already in use and being snapped up like hotcakes, there CAN BE NO PROOF of computerized vote fraud.
That's right:
1. No one has examined the code line by line to prevent malicious code.
2. No one CAN examine the code to detect malicious code after the fact because it's "proprietary trade secrets."
3. Any recount using the same machines that might have been fraudulently programmed or just had errors would likely produce the same result.
4. There is no voter-verified paper ballot which can be used as a legal recount. Diebold machines in GA can print a mirror image of the ballot after the fact, long after the voter has gone home, but not only would that not reflect the voter's wishes if his or her vote had been changed just as it was being recorded, it also can't be used for a recount because Georgia has made the electronic vote the only legal vote.
Voila! No way to prove fraud. Even if we knew -- let's say a whistleblower told someone that such-and-such an election had been stolen, there's no way to prove it.
Eloriel
|