The other night, I saw Tucker Carlson and Al Franken arguing on Tim Russert's show, and at one point, Carlson said that he couldn't understand why there was such "anger" at Bush - and he inferred that most of the objections against the President were based on emotion and not reason.
This is the new Republican scam - they're trying to portray us as irrational "haters". Two examples:
David Brooks in the New York times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/30/opinion/30BROO.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fDavid%20Brooks<snip>
The quintessential new warrior scans the Web for confirmation of the president's villainy. He avoids facts that might complicate his hatred. He doesn't weigh the sins of his friends against the sins of his enemies. But about the president he will believe anything. He believes Ted Kennedy when he says the Iraq war was a fraud cooked up in Texas to benefit the Republicans politically. It feels so delicious to believe it, and even if somewhere in his mind he knows it doesn't quite square with the evidence, it's important to believe it because the other side is vicious, so he must be too
<snip>
and Charles (Sour) Krauthammer in Time magazine:
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/from_search/0,10987,1101030922-485769,00.html<snip>
" Bill Moyers may have his politics, but his deferential demeanor and almost avuncular television style made him the Mr. Rogers of American politics. So when he leaves his neighborhood to go to a " Take Back America" rally and denounces George W. Bush's " government of, by and for the ruling corporate class," leading a " right-wing wrecking crew" engaged in " a deliberate, intentional destruction of the United States way of governing," you know that something is going on. That something is the unhinging of the Democratic Party. Democrats are seized with a loathing for President Bush."
</snip>
They're all on message - the implication is that Bush is not doing anything wrong, that we're just all consumed with animosity at him - for Florida, or whatever, and that the dissatisfaction has no basis in policy.
Of course, that's bullshit - and when you consider that there was a full-scale hate industry against Bill Clinton for eight years, I think that the hypocrisy is apparent enough.
But they're working together, and we have to, too - make sure that you have reasoned critiques of Bush, and they're not hard to find these days. Especially if you're working on a campaign for a candidate. Swing voters tend to be apolitical - but they will listen to people who describe politics in terms of problems and solutions. This is who these right-wing minions are appealing to - they're trying to imply that they are the rational ones, and we on the left are just some angry mob who don't want Bush around anymore.
Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.