Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Clinton were still president...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 04:10 PM
Original message
If Clinton were still president...
... what would he be doing?

First off, let me state that Clinton's statement that "nobody anticipated this" is asinine, and he knows it. My guess is that he is trying not to antagonize Bush at the moment so that he can get the money that Bush is begging for (given that he's sunk so much of the treasury into Iraq).

But whatever you feel about Clinton's current statements, think back to Clinton handled major disasters and how Clinton managed FEMA.

How did Clinton handle major hurricanes? How did he handle Hurricane Floyd? Clinton's excellent management of FEMA (which Kevin Drum cites at the Political Animal blog @ http://www.washingtonmonthly.com) wouldn't have gotten us into this mess. FEMA was a joke under Bush Sr. and it regressed badly under Bush who appointed a crony from Texas who had no disaster management experience to the head of the agency, cut its budget, relocated it to be under Homeland Security and refocused it towards terrorism at the expense of natural disasters.

Whatever you think about Bill Clinton's statement today, you know how he would have handled this. I'm not even willing to blame Bush for 9/11 (although I do think he didn't fully appreciate the threat and totally fucked up the aftermath of that), but Bush has an awful lot of responsibility for the disastrous response to this event, and thousands of people on the Gulf Coast, perhaps even tens of thousands, are dead because of his incompetence.

That's not something you could have said about Clinton. Or, for that matter, Gore or Kerry.

* I admit to not knowing how much better Kerry could have handled the situation - it would have been better, but given that he would only have been in office for a few months without enough time to fully fix all of Bush's messes, the response may still not have been great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry commanded in a war
He can make real significant decisions in times of duress.
2) Clinton visited disaster sites and talked with people and took command. He came to the Midwest in '93 during the floods and made things happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I do not have one shred of faith in Bill or Hill anymore.
I am through with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC