David Kay is on CNN - Democratic Underground

CatWoman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:12 PM
Original message

David Kay is on CNN

Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 04:13 PM by CatWoman

Just finished his testimony before Congress.

Lying windbag.

Hasn't found a damn thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cush

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message

1. Lying sack o' Bleep

All summer NBC kept pumping up his report. "oh we're close, gonna find 'em!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CatWoman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message

2. says he needs 6 - 9 more months

to find Saddam's WMD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cush

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. Hmm

just in time for the campaign season

how convenient

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CatWoman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. DING DING DING!!!!

on the nose.................

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

leftchick

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2

5. and 600 million taxpayer bucks

isn't that what chimpo has in that 87 billion request? 600 million dollars to either plant or not find any WMD. My head is gonna explode...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

protect freedom impeach bush now

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5

8. cant use the UN. Would cost US taxpayers $0.00

Cant have that now can the PNAC cabal.

$600 Million is $600 Million more into PNAC's crooked
corporate hands.

Cant have the UN screwing things up by charging nothing.
PNAC cant make blood money that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

truthseeker1

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #2

18. and $600 MILLION more!!!

Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 05:05 PM by truthseeker1

but don't ask him about that because he's not the budget man....he doesn't do "budgets or windows."

:wtf: Why do they need so much for this inspection? And it's TWICE what they've already spent! Does Halliburton do weapons inspections TOO????

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cush

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:20 PM
Response to Original message

6. Lol

No massive nuclear program?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cush

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:22 PM
Response to Original message

7. Rockefeller is on

Slamming David Kay.

He says we need another 6-9 months to see if they can find anything else. Well, we went to war because the PResident said there was an imminent threat

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Catherine Vincent

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #7

11. Yeah, Rockefellar looked really disgusted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

devinsgram

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7

15. What part of "imminent threat " doesn't he understand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Catherine Vincent

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message

9. I watched both CNN and MSNBC simultaneously.

Both had different captions in the background:

CNN - Kay - No weapons of mass destruction found (or something like that)

MSNBC - Have Evidence of Weapons Program

Hahaha!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Blue_Roses

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:27 PM
Response to Original message

10. Rockefeller: "no surprises here..." LOL

ain't that the truth

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

2cents

(522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:28 PM
Response to Original message

12. To think all Blix was asking for...

...was sixty more days and we might have avoided this whole thing. Damn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

trof

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:29 PM
Response to Original message

13. Did he really say

"don't be surprised if there are surprises"?
Hold it...hold it.
How can I not be surprised if there are surprises?
I mean...a surprise WOULD surprise me, wouldn't it?
Otherwise...um...it wouldn't be a surprise.
whew
I think I better go fix a drink.
see ya.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cush

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13

14. i think he said

don't be surprised if there aren't any surprises

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TacticalPeek

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #13

16. Absence of surprise is not surprise of absence. Or is. Or something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

The Magistrate

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-02-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message

17. The Timing Of this, Ma'am, Could Not Have Been Better

It feeds into the exposure of Ms. Plame, as vengeance on her husband, for revealing one of the most blatant lies in this regard, by showing conclusively all statements by the criminals of the '00 Coup concerning the threat of Hussein were lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 01st 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.