Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slow FEMA: Lihop or Gross Negligence?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:11 PM
Original message
Poll question: Slow FEMA: Lihop or Gross Negligence?
In another discussion thread we've had a divergence of opinion on the criminally slow responese to the disaster in New Orleans: whether the Bush administration planned out the slow response to Katrina's devastation, forecasting inner city looting that they could use to test out martial law or whether they're just a bunch of incompetant fuck ups who don't care about disasters, people, doing their jobs, or planning ahead.

The choices come down to these:
(1) They deliberately withheld food and water from American citizens, hoping for riots to quell with widespread martial law and new high-tech weapons.
Or
(2) they are the most incompetent, clueless, uncaring, evil bastards the human species has ever produced.


But I'll allow a couple of other options. (I'm voting for the incompetant evil option rather than the well-planned genocide option)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Morons and political hacks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Are you talkin' about me?
...or my cousin George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's indisputable they have been withholding aid.
Now, the question: did they know their proactive withholding of aid would exacerbate the crisis and result in more deaths, or did they not?

For those who like to cite Occam's Razor, what does it tell you now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Indisputable that aid hasn't arrived. "Deliberately" is still unproved.
You can believe what you want. But you need to back up "deliberately with proof, which of course you do not have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. If you choose #1, then perhaps #5 is true too.
FEMA did just what Bushler wanted them to do: strategic witholding of resources.

Personally, I chose #2 - they are incompetent and evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stilpist Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Both
One doesn't preclude the other.

I voted for incompetent because you included "evil" in that choice and so that was close enough.

IMO, the deliberate part was probably not so tactical. I think rather that the Redthugs deliberatley fuck up the government when they control it so as to lead people not to expect the government to be of any help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Obviously it's a limited choice - as all polls are.
But yes, Republican contempt for government is probably at the root of Republican poor management of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. In between Choice 1 and Choice 2
They're not stupid enough to want to create riots that undermine them, but there's an arguable case that they did withhold help in some cases until they could take advantage of a photo op. Wasn't there a thread about starving people being forced to wait until Laura Bush got there and spoke before they could eat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringEmOn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they're (FEMA) on the ground in NYC on Sept 10th, 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC