Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

i hope rush can't be arrested.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 06:55 AM
Original message
i hope rush can't be arrested.
given what is known now, i hope he cannot be prosecuted.

i'm prety sure that the maid broke the law when she recorded the conversations. i'm pretty sure that makes the tapes inadmissible.

she had access to his home so she could have sent any emails to herself from his computer.

so we have the word of one person who has profited by selling the story as evidence and nothing else.

i hope that still is not enough to prosecute someone on wod charges.
if i am wrong then we are even deeper into trouble than i thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. well....
... you are specualting as to the standard of proof and the evidence. I think a jury should decide if he is guilty, and mete out an appropriate punishment if he is.

Of course, that is a pipe dream, there is no justice applied against rich people in this country except for the most heinous violent crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. Exactly
Standard of proof and evidence.....

The Feds didn't have a videotape of John Gotti wacking anybody but they were able to put together a good circumstantial case against him....

Witnesses might be mistaken or intend to deceive but circumstantial evidence does not lie....


I'll wait for the evidence but it's silly to say that a person must be "caught in the act" to sustain a conviction...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's been under investigation for 5 months...
I'll bet they have a whole lot on Mr Rushbo.

But if he is an addict, and it looks like he is, wishing he blunder forward unchecked is the cruelest wish possible for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. does anyone know when the maid went to the police and named rush?
i was under the impression that it was her sources that were under investigation and that rush's involement wasn't know until she went to the cops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. <sarcasm> And I'm sure if it happened to you ...
Rush would be the first person to echo your very words.
</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. thankfully, i don't live my life aspiring to be like rush (grin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. the police have more eviedence than just the maids word.....
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 07:25 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
and Rush has hired an attorney....it has been reported that Rush has bought "thousands" of illegal Rx drugs in Palm Beach over the course of this investigation...also the Enquire would not have printed this story if it were not true, due to their higher rate of being sued...they are VERY careful and thus makes their stories more reliable then mainstream news...imho...I'm sorry I can NOT muster up any empathy for this hypocrit!...also note in story "she came forward after being granted immunity"...the investigation was already in progress and the police knew that Rush was buying before the maid recorded Rush.

http://newslink.org/cgi/goto.cgi?2=002985

Prescription's overuse linked to sudden hearing loss
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/auto/epaper/editions/friday/news_f3c79e9c06b1c1c100a1.html



One of the prescription drugs national radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh is alleged to have abused has been linked to sudden hearing loss, an affliction that struck Limbaugh two years ago.


Ray Fairall/National Enquirer
Wilma Cline says she used this cigar box to deliver OxyContin and other painkillers to Rush Limbaugh from 1998-2002. She came forward after getting immunity and told her story to The National Enquirer.

Oct. 14 edition of The National Enquirer.
Coverage from The Post
• Limbaugh linked to painkillers
• Overuse linked to hearing loss
• Rush Limbaugh profile
• 'Enquirer' relishes spotlight
• Dolphins on Rush: 'It's crazy'

Should he have quit ESPN?
Video: Rush on resigning
Windows | Real

At the time, doctors said they were unsure of the exact cause of Limbaugh's hearing loss, but said that overuse of medication was not a factor.

Limbaugh would not reveal the cause of his deafness.

Coincidentally, the House Ear Institute in Los Angeles, where Limbaugh sought treatment, discovered in 1999 that some of its patients with sudden hearing loss had overused a common painkiller that combines hydrocodone and acetaminophen.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. i'm not doubting the truth of it, just wondering about what proof
is required. especially the tape recording because i remember linda tripp broke the law when she recorded monica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. if it was a wire planted by the police
then they likely had a warrant.

But then again under the Patriot act, does anyone need warrants anymore??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. That was a Maryland law, though
I don't know what the law is in Florida, it might be different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does any one know
if buying illegal Rx drugs is a felony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. in that quantity? i'd be surprised if it isn't.
it may even be a felony to try but i'm no lawyer so don't trust what i say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yes
Buying prescriptions not prescribed to the buyer is a violation of federal law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I know it is illegal, but is it a FELONY? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. See post #14
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 07:48 AM by Lurking_Argyle
written by a pharmacist, who would know.

edited for typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Post #16 was mine
asking the question....can you try again, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I've never seen that on an RX
bottle. I'd like to see something that confirms my belief this is a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I've seen it
On my own and other prescription bottles. That's my answer. Remember, google is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I've been "googling"
Havn't found anything yet. What does it say on your prescription bottle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. i have a bottle of acetaminophen/cod#3 and there is no legal warning
but there may be different classes of pain pills ...some with warings and some without.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thought as much
Thanks for the info...I don't ever recall seeing anything about "Felony" on a Rx bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. yes it is a felony and states such on any RX bottle i have ever got filled
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 07:19 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. I'm betting that is a felony
They have really cracked down on Oxycontin lately...it's a very dangerous drug...I'm sure it varies from state to state...in some places, mere illegal possesion of Schedule II drugs is a felony.

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2001/ANS01091.html

OxyContin is a controlled substance in Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which is administered by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Schedule II provides the maximum amount of control possible under the CSA for approved drug products.

I'm also wondering if there are any "inter-state trafficking" charges in play...Inter-state is when they REALLY sock it to ya...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. it is interesting to see who is coming out of the woods lately
just takes a good groper and a drug traffiker to
bring out the real personas in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. </snarf>
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 07:15 AM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. we should all be interested in the rush thing because of civil libertys
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 07:44 AM by bearfartinthewoods
if it is now legal for a civilian to tape us and turn the tape over to authorities and we can be prosecuted soley on the basis of what's on that tape then we have just run down another flight of stairs into a police state.

ON EDIT..to make it plain that i'm talking about a civilian who is not working with the police under the power of a warrant but as an independent actor so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. Of course, Rush had no problem about recording conversations
when it involved Linda Tripp and Monica Lewinsky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. ironic 'ain't' it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Was't the maid
wired by the police? If so, it would be legal, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. yes? to which question or both
if she was wired by the police, that's standard operating procedure.
i hadn't heard a definitive answer to that so does your yes mean yes whe was working with the cops when she recorded him?

if so than i feel better. i know i've said things in casual conversations that i sure as hell wouldn't want to try and defend in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. yep...all they need is a warant
at least i hope they still need a warrant <sigh>.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I'm not sure...
Was the maid working for the Police? I havent read it that way...yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. It wasn't made explicit in the story so far
Cline told the Enquirer she went to prosecutors with information about Limbaugh and others after four years of drug deals that included clandestine handoffs in a Denny's parking lot.

She said she wore a wire during her last two deliveries to the conservative commentator and gave the tapes to authorities.

http://www.nydailynews.com/10-02-2003/front/story/122839p-110349c.html

But they'd have to be dumb as turnips to not have wired her legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no one in particular Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Seems a bit muddy.
'She said she wore a wire during her last two deliveries to the conservative commentator and gave the tapes to authorities.'


If she was wired by the cops, wouldn't they already have the tapes? They don't wire people by giving them a tape recorder, do they?


Maybe I've watched too many cop shows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Good point
Seems like she did this on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Thats been my take on it...
The maid put the screws to Rush independently of any police investigation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. ohh..good catch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. I know
Let's let Rush go scot-free and let's prosecute the maid. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xJlM Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. I don't
Let him serve time in a state prison. I hear the prisons in Missouri are really quite luxurious :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. I hope he's a physical mess, and imprisoned using some sort
of passage from the Patriot Act.

Call me petty, but poetic justice is simply too rare in this world. I'm hoping to savor it a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAH6988 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. He won't
spend a day in jail over this. And neither he or any other non-violent drug user should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. i think i agree with you about the jail time
this article says:
"Whether State Attorney Barry Krischer is interested in prosecuting Limbaugh isn't known. But prosecutors rarely pursue drug addicts unless they catch them with drugs. "

i know i agree that non violent drug users should not go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joycep Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. You have got to be kidding!!!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC