Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Before people compare Nagin to Giuliani consider this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:59 PM
Original message
Before people compare Nagin to Giuliani consider this
1) Rudy had the backing of the White House from the moment the first plane struck. 3 days after the hurrican hit Nagin and New Orleans were left twisting in the wind.

2) Rudy's tragedy, horrific as it was, was contained to lower Manhattan.

3) After the plans struck and the towers fell the assualt on NYC was over, the assualt (flooding, fires, civil unrest) continues for Nagin.

4) Rudy was given complete controll over his city once the tragedy began, Nagin was not.

5) Emergency personnel had homes to go to.

6) With the exception of lower Manhattan, NYC had electricity, communication, et al. NO does not.

7) People who wanted to or needed to get out NYC could, but other than tourists there was no reason to leave NYC after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The proportions of Katrina's damage to this nation completely eclipses
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 09:16 PM by bushisanidiot
the devistation we saw on 9/11/01... so many cities affected in several states.. the body count is going to be in the 10's of thousands.. so many are dying right NOW and more will die tomorrow.. thousands more are floating DEAD in the water.

30 people have died at the n.o. airport already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And people like O'Reilly and various RW talking heads are dissing Nagin. .
. . .claiming he is no Giuliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, there's no comparison - Bush wasn't on vacation - Bush remained
on vaction after Katrina hit...played guitar?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bush was really equally useless each time
I agree with the OP's list, 911 was a smaller problem - with an intense 2-3 hour period of destruction, massive loss of life, a huge fire to put out (which took weeks, if not months), then the massive clean up - which was slow to allow the best collection of human remains. The city was shocked, horrified, and in mourning - but almost all of it was totally in control.

By the time of September 11th, Gulliani had outworn his welcome in NYC. But, he did do a credible job at the time of 911 - mostly because he tried very hard to keep people informed and even admitted not knowing things he didn't know. This time period emphasized his best characteristics and allowed ignoring his worst. Remember though with in a few hours, the towers were hit, fell and they were gone. Mark Green, the Democratic candidate for mayor answered a question by saying that he would have done as well, which although probably accurate killed his chances.

The police and firemen had trouble communicating because their equipment weren't compatible - a Gulliani problem, but they worked very hard to find and save survivors. Unlike NO where the situation continued to worsen with no help, from the first day the incredably awful situation got better. Even on the first day, there were firemen from NJ helping. Over time, they had help from all over the country.

We went in to see a Broadway show in the last week of September - about 2 1/2 weeks later -as people were encouraged to do. 2 1/2 weeks after this, even residents won't be going back.

Part of the difference is emotional: On 911 we were attacked by foreigners and they hurt both our buildings and our sense of security. Also, NYC (which I love) is the center of the news media and is very much in love with itself. Something happening in NYC gets far more weight then elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. People were respected
The first assumption was NOT chaos and mayhem, people who wanted to come in and help were allowed to. People who wanted to leave were allowed to. They were all respected as Americans, because they weren't ALL black and poor. The attitude in New Orleans, and the south, has been completely different.

Get this, for instance:

"Hancock County officials, while respectful of MEMA/FEMA efforts, are begging for private organizations to help. They don't want you coming down in a 1965 Buick with three bald tires, but desperately need self-sufficient organizations who won't become a burden to come down and bring food, water, fuel, diapers, bedding, tarpolines, toiletries and the like. Don't add to the problem by getting stranded and becoming homeless, but help if you can."

What the hell kind of mind is this??? All I can figure is that they think some bozo in Detroit is going to say "hey, let's go down to the hurricane area and see if we can get free stuff". Sure there were a few people who did that after 9/11, but very few. I just don't think NYC got sidetracked by crime because they respected the citizens "with jobs" and knew any crime was not the behavior of the majority.

Race and class and thinking processes in a society that has been manipulated to turn against each other for generations. That's what happened in New Orleans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. When Rudy asked for help - it came. That is the only difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can't argue with any of that. Well said.
It also didn't hurt that the WTC was in lower Manhattan, in the Financial District. The people there (or those they left behind) had connections and used them to help facilitate action. The people in NO had no such path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. How do you think Rudy would have handled this
80% of Manhattan and Harlem under water, no electricity and Bush sitting on his ass for three days in Crawford after it happened.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC