Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was "security risk" TRUMPED UP to provide an EXCUSE for non-response?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:11 PM
Original message
Was "security risk" TRUMPED UP to provide an EXCUSE for non-response?
Looking that way to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep. Sure seems like it.
When the head of the FAA controlling aircrat in the regions says there were no reports of gunfire... you have to wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would seem so.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, chances are it's a duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henny Penny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes... and to explain why so many died....
"We tried to save them, but they kept shooting us...!"

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have to agree
and bringing in combat troops instead of doctors was no accident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. But first they had to stand down until the "security risk" got high enough
No army sent in to maintain order till - Day 5. Before that there were 300 NG in New Orleans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandiFan1290 Donating Member (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. It probably took 4-5 days to secure the Central Business District
That was the real "security risk"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes I think so. It's some of the same excuses used in Iraq - they've
forgotten where they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bring_em_home_bush Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes no doubt about it at all nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Um...
I called it while Carol Costello and Chris Lawrence of CNN were runmimng a real time PSY-Op...police station under siege, rescue workers assailed, snipers shooting at helicopters, fires, explosions...

Rummys's special ops and "contractors" did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, until those pesky kids like Anderson Cooper
got in the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. They're keeping HIM and Christiane away from New Orleans...
There's a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyranny_R_US Donating Member (988 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. One word...
YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I believe so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. yes nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC