|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:39 AM Original message |
Roberts As Chief Justice Means O'Connor Stays On Court For Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. what makes you think that he won't appoint her replacement soon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Because Roberts has to go through a confirmation process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I hope you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Since Roberts looks like he'll probably be confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CityDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Not likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think the process for Chief Justice nominee is separate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. No, you're mistaken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I think though that naming Rehnquist's replacment and CJ are separate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Rehnquist was the CJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. I'm just glad that assbag Scalia wasn't nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Yep, Roberts is better than Scalia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kedrys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Can't remember where I read it, but didn't Scalia threaten to quit if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntieM1957 (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. hope he follows thru on that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. Dems have some leverage now with Stevens CJ for the time being... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geoff R. Casavant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
13. I think the filibuster deal is off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. here's a pretty good analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yep, and their major point is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-05-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. We should push for a fillibuster until at least through October... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC