Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Freeper excuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:59 AM
Original message
Latest Freeper excuse
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 09:00 AM by dancingme
I got this from my Rep brother who regularly reads Lucianne.com for his talking points.

It was the Louisiana state Homeland Security department that refused to allow the Red Cross to deliver food and water and medicine, not the federal Homeland Security. The state Homeland Security department was in charge.

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh boy!
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. They will keep repeating this crap until every
moran in America believes it. Look at Rush's talking points, if he repeats them enough, people will believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Anything above level 3 hurricane
is under federal control. That's what I told him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nope.
Federal Homeland Security was in charge.

The moment Bush signed that executive order of a State of Emergency, HE had the power. It was all Federal from the early morning hours of August 27th onward.

Anything Louisiana did or did not do was strictly because the Bush Administration had failed in their responsibilities -- like issuing orders and failing to issue counter-orders.

There is NO WAY the Bush Administration can disclaim responsibility for this one.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. here you go:
http://www.redcross.org/faq/0,1096,0_682_4524,00.html#4524


I printed this out - think it was on Saturday - and I am carrying it with me whereever I go- has silenced quite a few freeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's what Lucianne is using
it says "The state Homeland Security Department had requested--and continues to request--that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans following the hurricane. Our presence would keep people from evacuating and encourage others to come into the city. "

So that is their reason to blame the state authorities. They claim it proves that the federal depart of Homeland Security did not prevent the Red Cross from helping. The state did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. The Red Cross link
is supporting the "state homeland security" theory. How much Federal money do they get each year that they're trying to protect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Did you read the whole thing?

As the remaining people are evacuated from New Orleans, the most appropriate role for the Red Cross is to provide a safe place for people to stay and to see that their emergency needs are met. We are fully staffed and equipped to handle these individuals once they are evacuated.

Is the key.

Since the Red Cross agrees with the decision, this is a total non-issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is That True?
I mean, it would make a difference. Is the Louisiana department part of the federal agency? Or did it receive orders from the feds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. No. It's not.
It was under Federal HS and FEMA control. They're making shit up again.

Rule of thumb, whenever they tell you something, assume it's a lie until it can be verified, or they provide you with proof, which happens once a solar eclipse. It usually is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. The Red Cross is lying?
They are the ones saying it was state homeland security.

In GA, the GEMA/Homeland Security is under control of the governor.

I don't think anyone's going to get a pass on this. And good, get rid of them all, none of them cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The president ordered the feds to take control on saturday.
And the Red Cross agrees that its role is to supply shelters, not enter into disaster areas.

So yes, Red Cross isnt being allowed into the disaster area, but no it isnt the governers responsibility, nor does it mean anyone is obstructing the rescue effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. On CNN this am
Angel Flight and another group(sorry I can't remember now who it was) said it was someone in the governors office who was putting up barriers.... allegedly stafffers said they didn't want patients airlifted out of state because they wouldn't be able to receive FEMA money.

I am certain we didn't get the full story. It sounds to me like some poor soul working in the govs office was *trying* to look out for the people, but was horribly misinformed or confused by red tape. I really don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. It was FEMA everyone said FEMA looks like karl is suffering from ADD /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. Effective as soon as the letter to Bush of August 28 from Blanco
was signed, FEMA was in charge. FEMA means FEDERAL EMERGERNCY MANAGEMENT, not state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Maybe the Freeper meant LEMA
Those people are MORANS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm waiting to hear comments from the LADHS on this one
See who was calling the shots.

Sure doesn't explain the FEMA delays though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Who controls Homeland Security?
The federal government. Their next point will be that the Louisiana state Office of the pResident failed at that level. Which is true, enough, but the Executive Branch is a FEDERAL branch of gov't. They'll just have changed the phrasing, making it sound like a state-level arm of that branch had failed, somehow. With the emphasis on STATE-LEVEL.

FEMA failed to act. FEMA. The FEDERAL Emergency Management Agency.

This is why Brown and Chertoff need to be examined with a microscope, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. If a terrorist attack happened tomorrow
in any state, are we to believe that the state Homeland Security dept could overrule any orders from the federal government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I believe that the federal office of HS has complete control
Esp. if a state of emergency has been declared, which was the case in LA BEFORE Katrina hit, making the feds responsible from that moment on.

Such is my understanding. Someone will correct me, if I'm wrong, I'm sure! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. Louisisana Homeland Security?
WTF is that?

And what is this secret organization and which homeland are they protecting? They afraid Texas or Mississippi will invade? Maybe some terrorists will sneak in from New Mexico.

There are tons of first hand accounts - NOLA.com is loaded with them...that details FEMA's hijacking of busses, trucks, food and water in those critical hours.

But then what do you expect from people so far in denial that genocide isn't just tolerated, it's graded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Actually, someone was here saying this was true last night, and that...
...Blanco was afraid to draw more people to the Superdome by delivering it there.

I don't know, honestly, but that's what was said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC