Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Rules Against the U.S. in Patriot Act Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:23 PM
Original message
Judge Rules Against the U.S. in Patriot Act Case
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 06:25 PM by im10ashus
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 7:07 p.m. ET

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) -- A federal judge lifted a gag order Friday that shielded the identity of librarians who received an FBI demand for records about library patrons under the Patriot Act.

U.S. District Court Judge Janet Hall ruled in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union, which argued that the gag order prevented their client from participating in a debate over whether Congress should reauthorize the Patriot Act.

''It's fabulous,'' said ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson. ''Clearly the judge recognized it was profoundly undemocratic to gag a librarian from participating in the Patriot Act debate.''

<snip>

''The government may intend the non-disclosure provision to serve some purpose other than the suppression of speech,'' Hall wrote. ''Nevertheless, it has the practical effect of silencing individuals with a constitutionally protected interest in speech and whose voices are particularly important in an ongoing national debate about the intrusion of governmental authority into individual lives.''

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Patriot-Act-Records.html?hp&ex=1126324800&en=8b3bbdba7648dc64&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok. Constitution
wins one and loses one (Padilla case).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Was just thinking that.
We know this case gets appealed. I hope the Padilla case does also. At least we will KNOW for sure where we all stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. So the Judiciary isn't dead yet
OTOH, bush* is going to be ramming through his SC nominations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Let's hope there are still some who recognize the law of the land.
The great thing about the Constitution is that it can be widely interpreted. But one thing is for certain. We STILL have the our freedom of speech. Try as they might to take even that away from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. "profoundly undemocratic" and profoundly IRONIC! Is this extremely
significant? I've not been following...It's good, regardless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. The ACLU has been doing a remarkable work since 9/11
They deserve our full support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Proud to say I am a card-carrying member.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Me too....I've been a member since 2000

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is an important win. Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC