Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Theory: One reason Bush wanted total control of NO operation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:47 AM
Original message
Theory: One reason Bush wanted total control of NO operation
Here is my theory as to ONE OF THE REASONS Bush wanted Blanco to give him total control of the NO rescue/clean up operation (besides his desire to control the purse strings for the benefit of his friends, etc.):

Bush wanted to make sure that death toll estimates would not start to leak out around September 11.

We are hearing very little about the numbers of dead or injured in NO.

There must be information out there, or are they not counting a la Iraq.

Bush's whole administration is about news control, propaganda control, image control. I suspect that Bush is controlling much of the news coming out of the hurricane area right now. The point is to create the illusion that his administration is competent, to cover up for the great failure: THE FAILURE TO TIMELY FUND THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE LEVEES.

My thoughts and information are not well developed on this, but I think I'm on to something important. Please add your thoughts and information and help me develop mine. Let's make a list of all the ways in which Bush is attempting to control the news about NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed
Everything we hear is carefully choreographed. We are being treated like the audience in a Broadway play instead of human beings and citizens of the United States of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What we are hearing
is how low the "real" body counts are. It's very curious.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If they are so low, the why aren't they praising Nagin
instead of crucifying him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I think the death toll will be lower than expected.
I think more people evacuated than originally believed.

I think that more people escaped to higher ground than believed.

I think that the property damage will exceed original expectations.

No evidence -- just my intuition. Take it for what it is worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad for them
that much of the press, finally, seems out of control. In the long run, truth comes out ... when the press is on the case, it comes out faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. i disagree that he wanted TOTAL control of NO...
what he wanted was a REFUSAL, by someone, anyone, to reliquish control...then, after tragedy has struck, we get this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1771840

in essence, NO will give to bush* re: citizens what 9-11 gave to bush* re: foreigners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Regarding the eventual death toll .. and this is so horrible to think ...
but could the Blackwater mercenaries working in NO be trying to impact the eventual death toll - under cover of night, retrieving and disposing of bodies?


Overkill: Feared Blackwater Mercenaries Deploy in New Orleans
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0910-07.htm

Blackwater USA
http://www.blackwaterusa.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Do these Blackwater mercenaries have ""SWAT" on their chest?
Perhaps they are the ones whose picture I am looking for from yesterdays Boston Globe p A10. They sure didn't look like US troops. Fierce and machine gun laden, four of them aiming up close at 2 men who were lying on the floor. This picture seems to have vanished from the earth. I searched yesterday including here on DU. No-one can find it but those who get the Globe saw it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't know ... surely someone has the pic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. O - I - L
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. He wants to carry out and cover up an American Nakba of African Americans
Edited on Sun Sep-11-05 11:33 AM by Coastie for Truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Stupidhead doesn't work or play well with others
Remember his "dictator" comment: He's fine with a dictatorship as long as he's the dictator. Total control over a situation, as he had in Iraq and so many other episodes, makes sure that nobody outside his cabal has the full story or all the facts in hand, and any criticism can be deflected with "Oh, you don't know the whole story, so you don't really know what you're talking about."

Then the discussion devolves from whatever latest deadly fuck-up just happened to a discussion about security concerns, information, disinformation, and of course, supporting the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC