Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers need to make no-bid contracts illegal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:01 PM
Original message
Lawmakers need to make no-bid contracts illegal
It is possible that privatization may work for certain govenment functions, but there must be a bidding process that can be enforced. The reason that so many tasks that have been privatized are screwed up is because there is no accountability, and with guaranteed contracts, there is no incentive to make things more efficient or reduce costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. that and those damn cost-plus contracts as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. M&O contracts, too.
Management and Operations contracts are the vehicles by which the Fed outsources continuing government operations. In doing so, they not only guarantee profits and bonuses to wealthy corporations, but they remove thousands of workers from the employment protections that federal workers have fought for. In other words, they screw the workers and enrich the wealthy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Urgent! Senate committee wants Katrina input - deadline TODAY 9/1
The Senate H.E.L.P. Committee (Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) has been requesting input on Katrina reconstruction. The deadline was changed from Friday 9/9 to Monday, 9/12 (but presume 9/11, by the end of today) to allow more input. I don't know if DUers are aware of this. It's a great opportunity to help influence the treatment of survivors and the fate of the Gulf coast.

The email for public input is listed below. These emails are going to start being reviewed by committee staff tomorrow (Mon, 9/12). I heard about this on a CNN radio rebroadcast of the Senate H.E.L.P. Committee roundtable (of disaster experts) on 9/8, but could not get this posted until now.

Email: katrina_comments@help.senate.gov
Senate H.E.L.P. website: http://help.senate.gov /
(The ranking Democrat is Sen. Edward Kennedy.)

My input to the committee is at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4735625
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree, when the Dems take over the Senate this should be a Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. no offense, but they will find away around that.
It is a nice idea, but just look at special legislation for large cities like Chicago. "Every city over 2,000,000 is exempted. . ." Don't you think that they will make these bidding wars fine tuned for their pet companies?

face it, it is an all out war. The haves and Have mores against the vast majority of the US. So far, they have been winning. With the buy out of formerly independent media outlets, it is no surprise.

privitization is a serious problem, one that cannot be easily fixed. Not in today's mmindset.

These NeoCons promoted themselves to be the best managers, the biggest supporters of small government. What do we have? The largest deficits in history, incompetent political hacks and cronies replacing pros, and billions being shoveled to their bigbizniz friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. so...when there is an emergency...without the time for a bidding
process? What then? I think you are opening a huge can of worms. No-bid contracts have their place...like them or hate them it is a fact...

subjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I said "certain" services
Edited on Sun Sep-11-05 01:18 PM by dansolo
Obviously emergency services should be federalized. But when it comes to rebuilding, there should be enough time for a bidding process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. agreed...thought you were being more broad...
but obviously my interpretation was wrong...pardon...

subjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC