Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Journal this morning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hey2370 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 07:56 AM
Original message
Washington Journal this morning
I watched a Washington Post reporter defend Bush and his wife against any and all claims. Mike Allen of the WaPo went on to explain why it was important to the felony investigation of the White House that Wilson supported Kerry: "it goes to his(Wilson's) credibility".

What a Bush suckup. He thought Bush's poem was endearing. He got all serious about Bush visiting Iraqi war wounded, saying that Bush had set it up so that he could visit some soldiers without the press knowing so that it wouldn't be a photo op. Yeah, Mike, then he made sure the idiots in the press KNEW that he had done it. He defended Bush AND his wife, and claimed no knowledge of the OSP out of Cheney's office.

Man, if most of the Washington press is as compromised as this loser, it explains why negative stories about the Plame outing and the Bush administration are hard to find. The press is NOT going to help America solve the Bush problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was watching this . . .
and did you notice the FEAR in this man's eyes?

This guy is totally petrfied that he will say the wrong thing and lose his cushy position.

I so wanted to call and say, "Sir, you are not a journalist, you are an ass-kisser."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. What was up with that?
Every fact that went against his little Bushie he had to chime in and "correct" the "misconception."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Topic next up BUSH HATRED!!!!!!
A guy who wrote an article in the New Republic.

I can't wait for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Up now.
Edited on Sun Oct-05-03 08:09 AM by soup
Jonathon Chait
New Republic

His article starts-
I hate president bush. There, I've said it.

Need to check and see if I can find it online.

On Edit: here's the Jonathan Chait/ Ramesh Ponnuru online debate:
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=debate&s=chaitponnuru092303

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush poem
"...I think I shall never see
any WMD's..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It made me sick
I saw this guy and it truly was disgusting. When the lady from Canada called he was horrible. Just another media whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. It goes to Wilson's credibility
...but Wilson's credibility is relevant how, exactly? HE'S not the one saying his wife was a CIA agent--at least until DOJ acted, he was scrupulously careful about that. And now that it's a public criminal matter, there's hardly any doubt about that. So his credibility is irrelevant there. His credibility about the yellowcake matter? Already proved correct, and anyway, quite irrelevant. Even if he were shown to be wrong about that--even if he were shown to be a blatant fabulist about everything in his life--his wife is still a CIA agent who was outed by a leaker, whom Novak identified as being in the White House.

I just get so irritated at this--not only is all the shit they're trying to bring up about Wilson just essentially untrue--he served in the Bush I admin with distinction, he contributed to Bush II--and not only is it only being brought in to further the smear attempt against him, it is fucking IRRELEVANT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Credibility? How About Sentelle, Fiske, Starr???
And those were the "Independent" prosecutors. Dare we discuss the credibility of David Hale, Linda Tripp and so on. You never heard their party affiliations or their connections anywhere as much as this smear campaign on the Wilsons.

This guy was pathetic...definitely set on his views, the worst trait in a "journalist".

Someone discussed the "Bushwhacking" of Tweety and his recent "revelation" (surprise, suprise) that he voted for the manchild. Knock me over with a feather. The poster noted that Tweety, like many inside the Beltway, love the glory and trapping of fame and power and no one can make someone feel that way than the GOOP. Especially now that they control so much access.

This media whore is more worried about his access and Dubya nickname than he is in judging this regime in the same view he and his other "liberal media" bretheren did with Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wilson's credibility?
Is this guy serious? I would say that Bush's admitting that the Niger story was wrong shows just how credible Wilson is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Re-run: VT Caller Is One Nut
She not only said that Shrub is the most honest human being who has walked the face of the earth, but she said that Shrub "does not wear the European suits that his predecessor did,"--------LIAR LIAR: Shrub wears $1,600 suits, whether Oxxford (U.S.?) or Savile Row. After her frothing over Shrub, she ended by saying Ahhhnuld has no place in U.S. politics for mistreating women and adoring HITLER: Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. RE: Bushs poem
disgusting
any man that refers to his wife as a "lump" in his bed deserves a big lump

right between his eyes


how can she sleep with that pig? I would puke

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC