Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why The FUCK Is Biden Suddenly Concerned About The 14th Amendment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:27 AM
Original message
Why The FUCK Is Biden Suddenly Concerned About The 14th Amendment?
2001 Patriot Act Vote:

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Allard (R-CO), Yea
Allen (R-VA), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corzine (D-NJ), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dayton (D-MN), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Hutchinson (R-AR), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Jeffords (I-VT), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Not Voting
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea


:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pul-lease - you did see your guys from Massachusetts
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Allard (R-CO), Yea
Allen (R-VA), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corzine (D-NJ), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dayton (D-MN), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Hutchinson (R-AR), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Jeffords (I-VT), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea

Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Not Voting
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. sure did
don't know why ANY of these fuckers suddenly care :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Well despite my anger over the Patriot Act, now is not the time
to question why they are questioning it. This fucker has the ability to wrest control of my body from me.

I've given up figuring out democrats but when they actually do some good I try to encourage even more!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. don't kid yourself
Roberts is in. done deal. its the NEXT one you gotta worry about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I know and I agree....
...doesn't mean I'm ready to bend over and take it up the.....

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. If we're to dis our senators for their PATRIOT vote...
we'll have to get rid of almost all of them. It was right after 9/11, it was freak out time.

Admittedly, it's sad that few have spoken out against it since then, but Bush isn't the only one in politics who hates to admit blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:31 AM
Original message
Feingold for Prez
or i might just sit out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, Feingold - the guy who SUPPORTED Ashcroft for AG
only democrat on the judiciary committee who did. Is he sucking up to Roberts yet? I mean the guy did say that Bush has the right to appoint the folks he wants (something like that).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. and he was right
Bush DOES have that right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. He should have voted "NO"
Not sure what the precident is if there was a 13-13 tie in the committee - I keep wondering if it would have kept Ashcroft out of the AG office. Thanks to Feingold we'll never know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagiana Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. He has the right to appoint ...
The Senate has the RESPONSIBLITY to confirm or deny based on the mans qualifications and demeanor.

We now have the poster boy to prove it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I am surprised that Kennedy voted for it
Unusual for him to go with the status quo. Got to love Feingold,

would he have a chance in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah but
Hopefully they'll get it right this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mary Landrieu didn't vote.
Well, ....:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. And see what happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Biden is also a big supporter of the War on Some Drugs
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:32 AM by Eric J in MN
Shutting down raves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Biden made a funny
He interrupted and Spector called him on it. Biden said he's filibustering. Then he said, "go ahead and continue to not answer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Corporate Personhood!
The 14th is where this mysterious power allegedly springs from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagiana Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. If you want to get into "strict constructionism" ...

If you want to debate with people who believe in "strict constructionism" this is where to start.

The bare truth is all these "federalist society" fuckers are a bunch of conservative asshole partisans who read the constitution in the light of what they want (the 19th century). They are NOT literalists. They merely find the bits where there pre-decided philosiphy fits literally with the Consititution and point out where liberals seemingly differ from that "literalism".

It is VERY true that there is no explicit right to privacy in the Constitution. For that matter, there is no explicit right to vote. But the same people who will trumpet this from the heavens will grant corporations all human civil rights based on the 14th amendment (corporations are composed of groups of people, therefore it is reasonable that they have the same rights).

I personally think that lefties and liberals HAVE leaned too heavily on the courts. Instead of leaning on courts to assert the SPIRIT of the Constitution, we should have been leaning on legislatures to make the Constitution more EXPLICIT!!!

The reasoning here is VERY clear. Those who HAVE rights are typically happy and content. There is no need to organize and become political. You organize and politicize when you are disenfranchised and in need of rights.

Conservatives have discovered that creating the mirage of "Christian Persecution" is a great trick to organizing a base into action. And their convenient slight of hand with "activist judges" have given them something they can run against in perpetuity.

By leaning back onto a slightly vague constitution, we fall right into their hands. We are apealing to those "unelected judges" again instead of getting literal. Our response to partial birth abortion bans should NOT be to assert constitutional rights. Our response should be a bill EXPLICITELY laying out the right to civil and personal PRIVACY that would lay the issue to rest for good.

We should be pointing out that THEY the conservatives have packed the courts with their right wing nutcase judges that are ready to take away their rights. We should be pointing out that their picks are ready to strike down minimum wage, child labor, workplace safety, worker compensation and pension protection legislation.

This is NOT hot air. These fuckers really DO want to dismantle the New Deal and all the prosperity that followed in it's wake. Our commercials should feature bread lines and dustbowls. They should feature little girls with their bowels sucked out and the greedy, irresponsible fuckers who did it to her.


We lean to heavily on the rights we are SUPPOSED to have instead of making those rights literal. Every time those right wing blow-hards bring out yet another constitutional amendment making flag burning illegal, we should bring forward an amendment making abortion EXPLICITELY legal!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC