Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why isn't bush being arrested like the negligent nursing home owners?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:48 AM
Original message
why isn't bush being arrested like the negligent nursing home owners?
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 07:50 AM by mopaul
their alleged crime is the same: homicide by gross criminal neglect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. insanity is a defense, no?
he is not mentally competent, ergo, he cannot be guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i believe his mental incapacity is perfect grounds for his removal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 25th amendment, section 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's been some discussion of the legal issues at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Could this be why?
From the Stafford Act

NONLIABILITY

"Sec. 305. The Federal Government shall not be liable for any claim based upon the exercise or performance of or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a Federal agency or an employee of the Federal Government in carrying out the provisions of this Act"

http://www.ohioema.org/robertt.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Great catch! But, again, this is civil liability - no immunity to criminal
penalty is created here for malfeasance that rises to a level of negligent homicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Bush is not THE "Federal Government" he is more of an employee of it ...
he didn't do his job and by his lack of action was directly the cause of deaths of hundreds (although I'm still leaning towards thousands) of human beings.

While according to Sec 305 apparently uou can't prosecute the whole Federal Gov for the lack of action it does NOT seem to say you can't prosecute an employee of it, an individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. exactly, shitty employees get canned in the real world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. this was the VERY first thing that came to me when i read that last night!
they let a few die through negligence, but the rest died through bush's negligence. ugh. the hypocrisy sickens me. literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. because this is Murka
and 2000 was a coup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Executive privelege.



He has killed so many in Iraq and Afghanistan that a few more corpses don't matter much.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. the dead babies at Convention Center
I still think the parents of the babies who died at Convention Center have a case against Chertoff.


http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050913/NEWS01/509130314

"I saw six dead babies lined up in the bathroom, a dead man covered with a sheet outside the Convention Center and there was a woman holding on to a dead baby," Holmes said. "I thought they were just going to push us into one area, shoot us and dump us in the water."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toey Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why doesn't someone sue him and find out really what happens
let it go all the way to the Supreme Court...oh wait, nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC