Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, IS there a link between the nasty hurricane seasons we've been

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:52 PM
Original message
So, IS there a link between the nasty hurricane seasons we've been
seeing and global warming? I've heard "some say" no. What scientists saying? Which scientists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. direct link is impossiable to draw
however, there is a link between warmer water and hurricanes.. (which is why there are no hurricanes in winter)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I see. Perhaps if the warming trend continues, then we'll know for sure.
That's a sucky way to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's The Best And Fairest Answer
Science should never be sacrificed to politics on the right or left or you end up with Lysenkoism...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. it's a matter of connecting the dots ...
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 04:06 PM by Lisa
As shoelace noted. All we've got to go on are probabilities ... for example, I can make a prediction that the big repaving project downtown is going to mess up the bus schedule, and if my bus is late, that might indeed be the case -- or it could be unrelated (bus gets a flat, etc.).

But given that we already know what kinds of factors increase the strength of hurricanes (if not the number that actually form), I think it's a safe bet that warmer sea surface temperatures (already noted) are not going to improve matters.

The current reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (hundreds of scientists worldwide who have been studying global warming for a couple of decades or more).

http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/

The "Synthesis" report combines the scientific and impacts parts pretty well. Kind of a heavy read, but it's pretty well-documented. The Coastal Zones and Insurance chapters of the Impacts book do take the potential of more serious storms into account.


It's difficult to say whether one particular storm, or drought, or forest fire (or even one bad year) is entirely the fault of global warming. Until we are past the period where the latest upswing in the # of North Atlantic hurricanes is supposed to subside, we won't be able to say for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone who denies the weather patterns are shifting
is a moran. We are seeing it right before our eyes. Whatever is causing it it is definitely happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. This was predicted. Let's believe our eyes, not *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. crazy tree huggers always say this
global warming? you gotta be kidding me, that's a wild-eyed liberal fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Didn't raygun or somebody deny the ozone hole, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. No substantive connection yet shown. Just a couple of hints.
The topic is complex, the timeframes are long, and the science doesn't progress as fast as people would like. It could be we're seeing weather patterns changing due to global warming. It could be just natural variation. Keep in mind that just because we've seen a bad year, doesn't mean we're outside the range of the last century, or that we're seeing a shift in pattern as opposed to an outlier.

Gore, of course, wants to claim this is global warming at work. The freepers, of course, want to say it's nothing but normal variation. (Except for the ones who are claiming it's the work of god.)

It's all just supposition. Except the last, which is just nonsense.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. at the risk of oversimplification:
whether global warming is "real" or the actual cause of changing weather patterns shouldn't even be the issue. THE ISSUE should be that spouting smoke and exhaust into our atmosphere can't be a good thing.

Any politician who says otherwise or doesn't believe the extent to which we are poisoning our planet is an imbecile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. exactly! And this is where the precautionary principle comes in ...
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 04:11 PM by Lisa
As you say, Pepperbear -- we already know enough about the possible negative consequences to be able to put things together. We've got evidence from multiple sources that large amounts of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere will lead to significant changes. There's enough data to draw conclusions from, even before we have 100% certain understanding.


(It's this kind of approach which enables forecasters to plot a "cone of probability" and tighten it as they get more information, on where a particular storm is headed.)

p.s. we also know that certain types of emissions (e.g. NOx and particulates) are also bad for human health. From that standpoint alone, doing something about fossil fuel use would be a good idea, even if there were no relationship with global climate patterns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Stop making sense. Rember, trees cause pollution. Raygun says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC