Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Carter/Baker Report can't face how the GOP stole America's 2004 election"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:03 PM
Original message
"Carter/Baker Report can't face how the GOP stole America's 2004 election"
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 07:04 PM by understandinglife
Carter/Baker Report can't face how the GOP stole America's 2004 election & is rigging 2008

by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman


September 20, 2005

The stolen elections of 2000, 2002 and 2004 are nowhere to be found in the milquetoast Carter-Baker Report now passing for wisdom on America's broken electoral system.

And unless the public is ready to face the reality that we no longer live in a nation with credible elections, the 2008 balloting is all but over.

As investigative reporters and registered voters living in central Ohio, we witnessed firsthand the outright theft of the 2004 election. We also endured the unwillingness of the Democratic Party to face up to a carefully choreographed "do everything" strategy that gave the presidency to George W. Bush for a second time, and which could make all elections to come virtually moot.

The just-issued report of a special commission headed by former President Jimmy Carter and Bush family consigliore Jim Baker is of little real value.

Much more at:

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1462


Do try to read the entire article and send it to others, but, more importantly, please join me in calling on Congressman John Conyers to launch his candidacy for President of the United States of America.

And, please urge Skinner to request the DU Activist Group to spread the call for Congressman Conyers to do just that:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=106x23663

He can force the entire Nation to realize that the 2006 Congressional Election and 2008 National Election are effectively stolen unless sweeping reform is implemented. That is more than enough platform given that without an equitable and verified election process America will remain what it became in 2000, a neoconster fascist oligarchy.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't read it yet
but my first knee-jerk is that I trust Jimmy Carter to tell it like it is, particularly with regards to elections. He's supervised so many.

But I will read it more completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. "The tactics the GOP perfected in Ohio 2004 are now being honed for re-use
... in 2008. Neither Al Gore nor John Kerry nor the core of the Democratic Party has been willing to face the reality that elections in the United States are all but over. This latest wimp report from the Carter-Baker whitewash commission does no better.

Unless our electoral system gets a total top-to-bottom revamp by an informed public willing to deal with the systematic poisoning of American democracy, there is no reason to bother printing the ballots or plugging in the voting machines in 2008.

Ibid.


Truth.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. With all due respect to Fitrakis and Wasserman...
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 07:28 PM by Rex_Goodheart
(and I really appreciate all the work they've done) I don't see much actual objective criticism of the details of Baker-Carter's recommendations.

Yes, we know 2000, 2002, and 2004 were stolen. Yes, we know that this report fails to acknowledge those thefts. But if the recommendations are at least workable I'll settle for that. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater!

Edited for grammar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Spencer Overton: Establishing Procedures for Credible Advisory Commissions
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 07:27 PM by understandinglife


And:

The Commission's "Real ID" recommendation is more restrictive than the photo ID proposal rejected by the Carter-Ford Commission in 2001, and more extreme than any ID requirement adopted in any state to date. The Commission's proposal is so excessive that it would prevent eligible voters from proving their identity with even a valid U.S. passport or a U.S. military photo ID card.

Link to full statement:
http://carterbakerdissent.com/dissent.php

And, link to a more extensive rebutal:
http://carterbakerdissent.com/final_carterbaker_rebuttal092005.pdf


You may want to start with these.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Rep Conyers: "this national ID voting card is more of the same old ..."
Make no mistake about it, this national ID voting card is more of the same old Ken Blackwell-style Republican electoral dirty tricks, where Democratic voters are deliberately disenfranchised so that Republicans can win elections. Remember the lack of voting machines in Ohio for Democratic voters? Remember the machines that broke down or registered strange numbers of votes for George Bush or unknown third party candidates? Remember Ken Blackwell’s paper weight requirements for voter registration cards?

Imagine if the Republican party can, in one fell swoop, legally prohibit more than ten percent of voters, most of them poor, minority and elderly voters, most of them Democratic voters, from being able to vote.

http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000245.htm

Carter's assessment of the Commission's proposed "solution" is way off the mark. Just as many provisions of Republican sponsored legislation have gone unfunded, this voter ID requirement will meet the same sticky feet and the voters will have to pick up the tab at the end of the day--and that's only if they're lucky. If they're not lucky, they will not get to vote at all--this is the more likely result of a federally mandated voter ID system.

http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000246.htm



Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. the national ID card component of the report invalidates the whole thing
I'm amazed and disheartened that Carter signed off on this . . . and that he, of all people, didn't delve far enough into the subject to understand what happened in 2004 (not to mention 2000 and 2002) . . .

I know that Carter is neither that uninformed nor that stupid . . . I can only conclude that, like the rest of the commission, he knows about the stolen elections, and he's okay with it . . . or at least not willing to rock the boat, for whatever reason . . .

maybe Baker somehow convinced Carter that disclosing that the elections were stolen would destroy the United States . . . and Carter believes that what the commission is recommending will solve the problem in the future, so he's going along . . .

whatever his reasoning, I'm hugely disappointed . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am troubled and deeply saddened that Pres Carter is in any way ..
... associated with this train-wreck.

For further context of how big a disaster this "report" is:

Diebold Stock Hits 52-Week Low!

PLUS: More Resounding Thuds from the Baker/Carter Report...or, as it may soon be known, Dr. Robert Pastor's Disaster...


Shares of Diebold, Inc. hit a 52-week low today, for some reason, falling to $44.37/share at Tuesday's close. Perhaps it has something to do with this, but whaddu we know?



In other tales from the last vestiges of American democracy and reaction to the Baker/Carter "Election Reform" fiasco ... Stories on the charlatans behind it, the skinny on the guy who invented it, the warnings he was given and ignored, the Voting Rights groups who laughed him out of the room today, the fallacy it's all built on ... and so much more.

"Turd in the swimming pool" anybody?...

THE ROUNDUP: http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001849.htm


President Carter has been severely compromised; our America is just about destroyed.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Carter is speaking tonight
I hope this issue is brought up. I remember reports of him saying our voting system was basically a joke, my head is spinning here a little bit. linkwww.cartercenter.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I did a quick glance at their official report
I was encouraged by what I read on page 34.

Yes, they say we need a VVPAT (Voter-verified paper audit trail), but what page 34 says is that that trail actually consists of paper ballots to be used in recounts... In other words, it's not just some cheap receipt that the voter looks at then throws away, not to be reused again while the computer adds up anything it wants.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well entrenched, illegitimate,...
...fascist regimes, have and will never be displaced by an opposition party working within the system. They're displaced internally via revolution or not at all. Sorry, but that's the reality of the situation, folks. Absent the required revolution (our most likely scenario), what we'll see in coming years is the theatrical illusion of free and fair elections maintained for a few more election cycles. Then at some point, after domestic dissent has been thoroughly crushed and the remaining populace is sufficiently numb and docile, elections will be done away with altogether, considered an expensive, unnecessary charade by the new fascist State. Welcome to AmeriKa.

It is said that history repeats itself. That's because it does:

http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/germany-1933.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC