Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We really do have to get out of Iraq now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:18 PM
Original message
We really do have to get out of Iraq now
If Bush had gone to the UN and gotten a real inspection regime, and Saddam had snubbed us, I would have reluctantly supported war. I felt that sanctions were going to have to be put on Iraq indefinately and that due to that and the fact that innocents were the most common victims of the sanctions, I felt war might be the better option.

Yet that didn't happen, the weapons weren't there, the war has lasted longer than even the most pessamistic projections suggested were possible, and the cost has been insane.

But, I still thought staying in was necessary. We had seriously broken Iraq I felt we needed to fix it. I felt that giving Iraq the time to train a police force and army to both deal with the insurgency and respect human rights, might save them from distruction.

I no longer believe that is possible. The fiasco with the British and the Iraq police have convinced me that it is all over. It has been well over a year since we have heard mission accomplished and this is what the British, and remember their part of the country is the one which is running well, have wrought.

If the police are 'riddled with insurgents' as was reported on NPR in the wake of this incident, in the best run part of the country, just what are places like Faluga like by now? Sadly, it appears to be a total mess.

I have come to this conclusion in the full knowledge that the alternative is an Iraq which is at best in a three way civil war, and at worst an Islamic state allied with a nuclear armed Iran. I harbor no illusions that the UN or NATO will bail us or Iraq out of this mess. They would be insane to try to do so. But, all we are currently doing is delaying the inevitable. When we have to knock down jail walls to protect our troops from insurgents in the police, we really have lost the hearts and minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I posted the same thing on another thread
The fiasco with the Brits shooting Iraqi police has convinced me that
there are many covert activities going on over there. I believe that
the situation is so chaotic that we will never progress towards a stable
state. I am not saying that Iraq should not be helped, what I am saying
that the operation we have set up cannot accomplish a stable government
and society over there. We will have to pay heavily for some sort
of UN effort to stabilize the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. yup, the british fiasco was an eye opener
We at least need a plan other than training their police and military. Moving our troops to the fringes of the towns and cities would be a starter. We are out there terrorising the inhabitants. Then the iraqis are terrorised by the terrorist. They can't win. Most of us are not military analyst so we can only make guesses but, we do know that what Rummy is doing is digging a hole for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. facts about Iraq from CIA site
slightly more than twice the size of Idaho

26,074,906 (July 2005 est.)
Age structure:
0-14 years: 40% (male 5,293,709/female 5,130,826)
15-64 years: 57% (male 7,530,619/female 7,338,109)
65 years and over: 3% (male 367,832/female 413,811) (2005 est.)

The military victory of the US-led coalition in March-April 2003 resulted in the shutdown of much of the central economic administrative structure. Although a comparatively small amount of capital plant was damaged during the hostilities, looting, insurgent attacks, and sabotage have undermined efforts to rebuild the economy.

Oil - production:
2.25 million bbl/day (2004 est.); note - prewar production (in 2002) was 2.03 million bbl/day (2004 est.)

Notice their oil production is up above pre-war standards and yet the
country is in ruins and so is their economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oil production very interesting, no mention of this
info in our media. I had no idea production was higher, although I see "est." and assume that is not absolute, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yes, it probably approximate
but higher is still higher, I would tend to believe the CIA over Bushco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vicman Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. One thing's for sure...
as confusing as this development is (I can't quite get ahold of it, and I'm sure neither side is telling the whole truth), it's also very obvious that the people in Southern Iraq could give a rat's ass about anything happening in Baghdad. So much for a workable constitution or anything approaching a cohesive, democratic state. This pipe dream has finally gone up in smoke. Out now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC