Don't they count? ...dead for LIES!!! ...MAJORITY WERE "WOMEN AND CHILDREN"!! N.O.T. S.O.L.D.I.E.R.S!!!
Researchers Who Rushed Into Print a Study of Iraqi Civilian Deaths Now Wonder Why It Was Ignored<snip>
And more than half of the people who had died from violence and its aftermath since the invasion began were
women and children.
Neither the Defense Department nor the State Department responded to the paper, nor would they comment when contacted by The Chronicle. American news-media outlets largely published only short articles, noting how much higher the Lancet estimate was than previous estimates. Some pundits called the results politicized and worthless.
Les F. Roberts, a research associate at Hopkins and the lead author of the paper, was shocked by the muted or dismissive reception. He had expected the public response to his paper to be "moral outrage."
On its merits, the study should have received more prominent play. Public-health professionals have uniformly praised the paper for its correct methods and notable results.
"Les has used, and consistently uses, the best possible methodology," says Bradley A. Woodruff, a medical epidemiologist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Indeed, the United Nations and the State Department have cited mortality numbers compiled by Mr. Roberts on previous conflicts
as fact -- and have acted on those results...