Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judith Miller & Robert Novak: My jump-the-gun I-told-you-so

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:44 PM
Original message
Judith Miller & Robert Novak: My jump-the-gun I-told-you-so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shit ma'am you don't post much do ya? n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 08:06 PM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "They also serve who only stand and wait."
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. No, but when she does, it's a doozie.
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 08:02 PM by Jackpine Radical
(Edited to correct gender. I looked.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kralizec Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Our own Deepthroat.
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 08:54 PM by Kralizec
or something...


edit: or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. This post may have been the reason I opened the account.
I don't like to write, but I put this thing together and, after getting positive feedback, posted it under different names on about a half-dozen venues. Each time I posted, I added new info/thoughts.

I think this (link below) is the most recent and best version:

http://www.mikehersh.com/All_Roads_Lead_To_Cheney.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Props man. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deserves a *kick* n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I remember your post well . . . .
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. What you said is very true. Every time I point out something like that
many on DU tell me I'm nit picking and playing with words, but that's exactly how lawyers work! It was fully explained when Clinton said "it depends on what the meaning of is, is."

You can say I never mentioned that name in this house, and be telling the truth, even though you talked a lot about that person when you were somewhere else!

I've dealt far too much with many very good attys, and I learned that you always listen to EVERY WORD, and very carefully!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mega kudos!
I think you nailed it two years ago, ByeDick. Don't stay away so long next time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mega kudos!
I think you nailed it two years ago, ByeDick. Don't stay away so long next time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. You da man, or da woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. You da man, or da woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow! That was one post that I missed. It sure makes good
sense.

So matter of fact that it sounds like inside information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've always thought it was Dick as you call him
Always. Which I put my tinfoil hat on and say hey WHO are you really? You have the inside track my friend. Great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. my thoughts exactly
user profile diabled.

that's cool. Perhaps it is finally safe for folks to start jumping ship? The boat is definitely going down.

Look at this, although a new threa is probably in order. Everything is connected:

Franklin pleads guilty

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Pentagon-Spy-Probe.html

Franklin is also ionvolved in the Niger forged docs. From DKos


JANUARY 2001 BREAK-IN AT NIGER EMBASSY

At night, between the first and second of the January 2001, a mysterious thief came to the embassy of Niger in Rome and into the residence of the counselor in charge. It turned out that some letterhead and seals were missing. A second dossier on Niger-Iraq trade soon came into Martino’s hands, one that included references to uranium trafficking. Martino claims he got it from embassy personnel and that he thought it was authentic.

Martino passed it on to the French secret service, who had paid for it, and also to Panorama , which assessed it by dispatching a female reporter to Niger. Panorama also turned the file over to the US Embassy in Rome for cross-checking in the US.

The female journalist soon told Martino that the trip to Niger had not produced any real confirmation, and also the French confirmed to Martino that the reports he had passed on to them were groundless. In other words, Bush’s war rationale was debunked way back in 2001 by amateur and professional sleuths.

Furthermore, it was a very amateurish forgery, not likely produced through official channels by any state intelligence agency with their vast resources. However, it was soon resuscitated as the Bush administration, in its first year, ramped up its public relations campaign for war.

ROME MEETING IN DECEMBER 2001

Michael Ledeen organized a meeting in Rome to gather evidence to support the planned war. Present were:

1. Michael Ledeen, Karl Rove’s foreign policy advisor and organizer of the meeting

2. Nicolo Pollari, head of the the Italian equivalent of the CIA, the SISMI

3. Italy’s Minister of Defense, Antonio Martino (no relation apparently to the spy Rocco Martino), Pollari’s boss

4. Larry Franklin, an American who presently is being prosecuted in the US for giving classified information to an Israeli front group, AIPC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) -- which some would call "spying," even though he has not been charged with espionage

5. Harold Rhode: member of Dick Cheney’s Office of Special Plans, protege of Ledeen, go-between with Iraqi exile and CIA asset (at the time) Ahmed Chalabi.

Ledeen already had a longstanding friendship with Francesco Pazienza, an Italian felon and forger who had been kicked out of the official Italian intelligence organization SISMI but who had found a new home in the renegade intelligence agency P-2 (Propaganda Due). Pazienza apparently was not present but definitely was known to Italian intelligence agents, including Rocco Martino, as well as to Ledeen.

Ledeen also was a personal friend of Pollari, who, like Ledeen, is a master of the card game bridge (Ledeen writes columns on it). There are close ties between Pollari’s official intelligence organization, SISMI, and Pazienza’s unnofficial one, P-2. In fact, P-2 recruits from SISMI.

This little group dusted off Martino’s discredited second dossier on Iraq-Niger trade, with the uranium references. The Bush administration now had its causus belli.

CAUSUS BELLI: A PIECE OF CRAP

The accompanying figure shows a bit of the cobbled-up intelligence report on stolen letterheads, forged by amateurs -- most likely Ledeen’s friend, Francesco Panzienza. This is the "evidence" on which George Bush sent almost two thousand young Americans and untold thousands of Iraqi civilians to their deaths.

SPRING 2002: JOE WILSON TO NIGER

Former US Ambassador (to Gabon) Joseph Wilson made the trip, apparently at the behest of the CIA, to determine the authenticity of the charges in Martino’s documents, even though the CIA already could see they were forgeries. Even the Panorama reporter could have saved him the trouble. Wilson reported back to the CIA that there was no proof that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger. The US government knew there was no proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. And I think I remember that thread too.
I have always said you can't trust any republican ESPECIALLY Dick Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good analysis in 2003
Good reminder.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedomfried Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. You are a psychic!
Now tell us, when will we see chimpy in handcuffs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. That Was Excellent Work, Ma'am!
Congratulations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Cool. And, bang on. The fun part has been watching everyone from ...
.... Rove to Condi trying to deflect any attention on 'the Office of the Vice President'!

But, the list of folk who will be indicted I have thought for sometime is going to be breathtaking in scope. Cheney and Bush, until they either resign or are impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate, will be un-indicted co-conspirators.

You've gotta feel kinda sorry for the folk who are going to suffer collateral damage, like James Carville. :cry:


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. i have felt this since the get go as well but i will go further...
do not think its an accident that Delay just was indicted first..and look for Frist very quickly as well so they can not be named as a new v.p...they must go down first so they can not be put in place of cheney!! Delay and Frist had to be ruined as possible v.p's first before fitzgerald takes down cheney !!

thats the way i see it..and cheney has to be spiro agnewed before they can go after *....

its what i have been telling others for quite some time!

fly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Wow. I like your thinking.
The very thought that there may be a friendly cabal operating beneath the evil cabal is encouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
47. This scenario struck me this AM
as I was listening to radio story about Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Now, this is wonderful
If they can get Heartless on one charge, and Monkey on others, then we can purge them both at once, but we have to wait until the 06 Congress is seated, so that following the impeachment and trial, Speaker Pelosi will assume the Presidency.

She can then appoint John Conyers as her VP.

And then, we can take a vacation or have a celebration!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
48. Like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
50. I would love to see this happen
Pelosi and Conyers. At last, we'd have people we could trust in charge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. Great insight!
what's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Most plausible scenario I have ever read.
You either know for sure or your analysis skills are world class. Guess we will know for sure soon. The Neo-Cons seem to be unraveling quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. I remember reading this post and smiling.
I'm smiling again.

Thank you.

Countdown clock for "resignation due to health reasons" should be ticking away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. It's his knees. Not the leak. No: wait: His knees are leaking. That's it!
The Vice President must resign his post due to a chronic leaky knee problem.

I never believed that annurism story: It was too easy to either make it a serious "life=threatening" condition, or nothing at all that would stop him from taking over the world's oil reserves. It was too usefull either way.

Anything they set up like that is suspect, when they load their hand with both aces, and hedge their bets. It's all Rove: Pure bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. So THAT's the reason for the aneurysm and the cane!!! (I don't believe
one word of these people's medical bulletins.) (I got onto that when Rove was AWOL during Katrina--and then--oh, ten days later, was it?--comes out with this newsturd about kidney stones. I figured he was negotiating his Treasongate pardon, and was on strike during Katrina because of it, leaving Bush Jr. to twist slowly in the wind of his own idiocy, out there in public.)

But I digress.

Great post, ByeDick! I agree with you totally, as to following their words closely. These are some devious bastards.

But I think that Wilson was set up. He said in an interview (freepress.org, maybe?) that he'd called Condi Rice, to get the regime to back off of the Niger claim, and she told him, through intermediaries, that she wasn't interested in his information, but, if he was so concerned about it, why didn't he publish it?

Sure sounds like she was baiting him. And if that's the case--if they knew it was coming--why did they go into this flurry to get Plame outed, contacting at least SIX reporters, circulating the Plame memo on AF-1, and putting top Bushites at max risk of treason charges? And then why did they compound that risk by outing Brewster Jennings? It feels like panic to me. Not like a well thought out plan. I think they WERE out to "get" the CIA, and were using the Niger forgery in some way to do it, and were using Wilson opportunistically to further that goal. But I think some other thing happened, that triggered this precipitous, foolish method of outing Plame. Why the hurry?

And here's what I think it is:

May 22, 2003: Brits chief WMD expert David Kelly started whistleblowing anonymously to the BBC about the Brits "sexed up" Iraq intel (--AFTER the Iraq invasion, which he had supported).

July 7, 2003: The Blairites ferreted Kelly out (which maybe his old friend Judith Miller had something to do with?*), interrogated him at a "safe house," and then told Tony Blair that Kelly "could say some uncomfortable things." Not HAD said. COULD say. (Hutton report.)

July 14, 2003: Plame outed (by Novak).

July 18, 2003: Kelly found dead, under highly suspicious circumstances; his office and computers searched.

July 22, 2003: Brewster Jennings outed (also by Novak), disabling all WMD projects and putting covert agents at great risk.

(In between, on July 21, 2003, Judith Miller wrote Kelly's obit for the NYT, but failed to mention her close connections to Kelly.)

What did Kelly know? My guess: He'd found out about the Bush Cartel plot to PLANT WMDs in Iraq--for Ms. Miller to "find" (all set up to do so, with an "embed" contract signed by none other than Donald Rumsfeld)--and of course for the enormous political gain that a "find" of WMDs in Iraq would have meant to Bush and Blair.

Whatever happened--and I admit that most of this is guessing--that coincidence of Plame/Kelly dates, outlined above, is just too coincidency to ignore. Kelly interrogated. Seven days later, Plame outed. Four days later, Kelly dead. Four days later, BJ outed.

I think the revenge story (against Wilson) is a cover story. I think they were panicked. Maybe found evidence that BJ/Plame had discovered their plot (or had foiled it), and wanted to make her mortally fearful.

----------

*(Note: Miller is the one to whom Kelly wrote his last email, the day he died, warning of "the many dark actors playing games." I don't think he was aware of her part in all this.)

----------

I agree with you that Cheney is behind it all, and it's extremely savvy of you to have picked up on the wording of those statements. The place Dick Cheney wasn't. That's good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. The way I see it,
in Operation AWOL, they were able to make a true story false by discrediting an insignificant document. In Operation Yellowcake they hoped to make a false story true by discrediting two insignificant people.

The fact of the matter, as I see it, is that Dick Cheney knowingly forced the Yellowcake story into the State of the Union Address. And because the so-called news media have been so successful in brainwashing us, we didn’t, and still don’t, see Cheney’s bogus nuclear threat as a very big deal. But, in reality, what Cheney did is a textbook case of nuclear terrorism. He falsely claimed that if we didn’t go to war, we’d die. That’s terrorism. There's never been a better example of terrorism. (See Title 18.)

When Cheney realized that the cake was about to hit the fan, he panicked. He underestimated his media operatives, and gave no thought to Brewster Jennings, or to the safety of covert operatives.

He simply attempted to provide the second half of a controversy in order to avoid the birth of a scandal. It didn’t work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. What's weird
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 10:04 PM by Marie26
In the article, Novak's very careful to parse his words: "Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report."
So Novak only links the "administration officials" to the info that Wilson's wife suggested that he take the trip. The key info, that Plame is a CIA agent, is not atributed to any source. Why? It's no crime to disclose the first bit of information, but it is a crime to disclose an agent's identity. It looks like they were being very careful to keep the two sources seperate; so administration officials aren't connected to the actual leak of her job. So who did Novak learn Plame's identity from? It seems like Novak did use this phrasing on purpose. This sort of bugged me when I read it, & I figure you'd be the one to know the answer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Could the source be Miller?
Edited on Fri Sep-30-05 12:32 AM by Marie26
It's probably tinfoil hat time here, but...

Here's a crazy thought: what if Novak's source was Judith Miller? That would explain a whole lot. Libby has said that did talk to her about Ambassador Wilson, but insists he never revealed his wife's identity & had allowed her to speak to the grand jury. Four other reporters who received the same waiver from Libby have already testified. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/15/AR2005071502080.html) Miller said she wouldn't testify to protect her confidential source, but apparantly, that source gave a waiver of confidentiality over a year ago. So what or who is she protecting?

If she really is reporting on WMD in Iraq, she could have easily learned of Plame's identity (as an agent in arena of WMD). This would also explain the Bolton jail visit - as Undersecretary of Arms Control, he was also a big backer of the "Iraq has WMD" agenda & could have fed her the info. If she really did have an agenda, she could have disclosed the actual identity to Novak, leaving admin. officials free to only add on pertinent information after the identity is revealed.

Looking at "the words": Novak said "Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this." That's true - he called <i>them</i> to confirm the info he'd already been given by Miller. So the identity's been "revealed" already & ad. officials can feel free to comment and expand upon it. Like you said, that info is now fair game. Rove coordinates to let media & officals know it's now legally safe to talk about Plame's role.

What if the source Miller is really protecting is herself? Maybe the flow was - Bolton - Miller - Novak - Rove (confirms & spreads). By referring the vital illegal information (CIA role) through a third party, the administration won't be directly implicated. By not actually publishing a story on this, Miller isn't implicated. By only repeating info he'd already heard, Novak isn't implicated either. It's a nice scheme, unless the vital link, Miller, is revealed. Maybe Miller is using "Libby" as a cover for the real source she doesn't want to reveal - Bolton.

Miller wrote many, many, Iraq/WMD scoops that turned out to be false. (http://slate.msn.com/id/2086110/) Bolton was in charge of "Arms Control" & eager to spin intelligence about Iraq's WMD (to the point of punishng CIA employees who didn't comply). Bolton could use the NY Times to spread false lies about the danger from WMDs and build public support for a war with Iraq. It's propaganda, really. And Miller was eager to publicize the "scoops" she received from Bolton about Iraq's WMD's - she eventually got a Pulitzer prize!

But if the grand jury asks about Bolton, she'll have to reveal her complicity in the propaganda machine for war & the false info from Bolton that she spread; as well as the leak of Plame's identity. So she uses a cover - she claims she can't testify because of Libby to protect her true source of info (Bolton) & prevent the grand jury from investigating her relationship w/Bolton. It's like a shell game - distracting by focusing on Libby, not the real source she's potecting. So, now she's free, but that might not be a good thing. Fitzgerald promised to "limit the scope" of questioning & not ask about other sources. What if Miller gets up there & then testifies that Libby actually revealed nothing to her at all? By assuring her a limited scope of questioning, the grand jury can't go into her OTHER sources - or her true source of the information, Bolton.

Thanks to anyone who actually reads this whole conspiracy theory. What do you think? Is it at all plausible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yup Yup Yup
I remember that thread. You are indeed correct. Exactly my thinking as well! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
33. You're so logical. Very commendable.
It's that same thinking that made it obvious to a few that Deep Throat was Mr. Felt.

This also means you'd make one hell of a good crook. Hahahaha.


Let the games begin!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. I remember that post from back in the day!
I really stood out in my mind, because you kept saying "notice the WORDS they use."

makes a lot of sense what you're saying. this is the most exciting news and speculation i've heard in a while. very exciting week!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. Here's another thread with the same conclusions:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I think Rove has Cooper on a leash.
All of that news a few weeks back was just way too convenient, too staged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. oops, Judy flew the coop
she'll threaten to testify against Cheney (who says Libby isn't speaking for his boss with the waiver business?) but very hush hush and Cheney resigns, health reasons given. Rove also. All Plame stuff inexplicably dropped. Maybe a presidential pardon. Condi (?) takes over the VP job, and we limp to the '06 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. thanks for bumping that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. recommended and kicked....thanks.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. check out mine from Sep 16 2003
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 11:36 PM by librechik
I told you so too!

ByeDick's is better, though!(and i bet we weren't alone)

The pertinent post is #15 (replies are good too!

in this thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=349408
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. i have thougt it was cheney all along too. so if all of us were able
to figure it, i am going to hold out confidence the fitzgerald does too. and i enjoyed reading your post byedick. wonderful information. excellent. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
44. Maybe that cane he was using a few days ago was for sympathy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. He's gonna need a wheel chair at least.
Maybe one of them 1970s iron lungs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
46. Outstanding!
I'm glad you are on our side. Any prognostication on Frist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
49. I have no problems with "I Told You So"s.
I believe in credit where credit is due. Enjoy yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
51. Great work!
Amazing,

I've Been apologising for the "Rove's War" (PlameGate) not being in the mail yet, for a couple of reasons - one, I was pretty sick for a month, and the other, I REALLY wanted to capture the best info I could, did a lot of research and within a few days I'll be shipping the Rove's War at about 150 minutes of what I consider good red MEAT on two DVDs..

It will open the eyes of some folks, but I think if nothing else it will clear up a lot of the mess you get from the media, so many talking and feigning and ducking, even those that know what's going ON are doing it.. so I've gone through hundreds of hours of TIVOd Hearings, the Downing Street Memo hearing I filmed, and this film will have a pretty large cast of characters..

Once I've shipped to everyone that donated (and yes I know some folks are pissed, and I do apologise publicly here, sorry, sorry - two emergency rooms visits are not my idea of fun and cramp my style )
I'm going to kick out a huge press release getting the word out that I've created with nearly a year of research what I think is the definitive story of Rove & Co and their nefarious plans..

For instance I compare the breakin in Rome just about the time Bush was being sworn in, to Watergate and how ROVE who just happens to have been using the FBI as his personal Gestopo since Texas, once "broke in" to Dixon's office, stole his letterhead and printed out party favors which he delivered to the Red Light district of Chicago and soup kitchens to come on over to Dixon's office and get Free Beer and Free women, etc - don't you think it's possible in Rove's position to have "plumbers" of his OWN?

I don't think that's tin foil baby, THAT is his Modus Operandi, he just gets grander with every cheap trick, having been suckled by "Mr Willie Horton" himself as a mentor..

This will be a must have for political junkies and I've put everything I have into it, there are some fun moments too, brought to you by Jon Stewart himself, and graphics to break up the filth being presented and get some perspective back while watching..

Finishing up the soundtrack (writing it all myself) and if I haven't mentioned it yet, did a Satirical version of "Secret Agent Man" called "Secret Agent Plame" which is a mambo version for the credits with some fun lyrics..

The FUN has just BEGUN :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC