|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:23 AM Original message |
Would you doubt that * admin is setting it up so when indictements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. I've actually suggested that on another thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. yeah, a P can't pardon him/herself so where else can they go to keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyBoots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. That shouldbe, verbatim, a Dem talking point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ya, you betcha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spindoctor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
4. Are indictment cases handled by the SCOTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Final appeals are, though. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. My point is that * admin follows no rules and knows nothing about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
7. If that's the plan why not just pardon everyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. yeah, I think that a P can't pardon him/herself.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. The judicial code of ethics requires a judge to recuse him/her self |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. no offense, and I know little about this, so take this as just speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. we do not disagree. There always is that possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
14. and couldn't the same be said about any of names that were floated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC