Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you doubt that * admin is setting it up so when indictements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:23 AM
Original message
Would you doubt that * admin is setting it up so when indictements
come the SC just tosses the cases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point.
I have been thinking that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've actually suggested that on another thread...
Interesting that a woman who has essentially spent the last decade keeping Bush out of legal hot water has been nominated for the SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. yeah, a P can't pardon him/herself so where else can they go to keep
power????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. That shouldbe, verbatim, a Dem talking point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ya, you betcha!
They noticed they hadn't legalized quite everything they wanted to engage in so they needed a fall back plan.

Let us hope Thomas and Fat Tony are pissed enough at being passed over for the BIG CHAIR that they put the weasels** on ice given half a chance.


** deepest apologies to any real weasels in the audience for the comparison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are indictment cases handled by the SCOTUS?
Doesn't seem a constitutional matter to me. Then again, I do claim judicial ignorance ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Final appeals are, though. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. My point is that * admin follows no rules and knows nothing about
anything besides setting everything to protect itself. What have we seen that shows he would keep any institution/organization's mission intact? Seems that whatever is necessary for them to win or keep power is fair game to manipulate for their own greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. If that's the plan why not just pardon everyone?
Unless, of course, the plan is to further undermine the credibility of the Supreme Court by adding more partisan hackery on to the Bush v. Gore type decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah, I think that a P can't pardon him/herself....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. The judicial code of ethics requires a judge to recuse him/her self
Regardless of their political positions, both Dems and GOP attorneys and judges would be up in arms. The USSC would be destroyed, our legal system would be in virtual chaos and Bush would have bought himself MUCH more trouble than even the most brain-dead PNAC neocon could have ever imagined.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. no offense, and I know little about this, so take this as just speculation
but, buying trouble for themselves has been a constant in this admin...Don't see that preventing them continuing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. we do not disagree. There always is that possibility
But, even the MSM and the general public would be up in arms if a miers-roberts cabal managed to fuck up the whole nation. Not just the legal eagles or judiciary.

But you are right. I would not rest easy until they are all out of office and in jail where they belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. and couldn't the same be said about any of names that were floated?
Doesn't seem to be reason enough to nominate Miers.

The reason for picking her is to avoid controversy and try to calm moderates and women who, because of the war, and the hurricane fiasco, and gas prices, and the economy, are abandoning not only chimpy, but the repugs in general as we approach the 2006 election.

It doesn't surprise me that his wingnut base is screaming about this appointment. He doesn't need to placate them, they have no where to go. He needs to stop the bleeding among moderates and independents who have foolishly bought into the notion that the repugs will keep the country secure and prosperous (when, in fact, exactly the opposite has occured on their watch).

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC