Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Progress: Right-Wing Peanut Gallery Hits Miers Hard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:15 AM
Original message
Think Progress: Right-Wing Peanut Gallery Hits Miers Hard
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 10:24 AM by Pirate Smile

Right-Wing Peanut Gallery Hits Miers Hard

The Washington Post recently reported that Bush might go with a Supreme Court nominee that would soothe his conservative political base:

"The president's core supporters are urging bold action to sway the court to the right. Some think Bush might pick a hard-liner to keep his base happy and prevent a further drop in the polls. "

It looks like Bush did just the opposite. Here what some conservatives are saying about the Miers nomination:

Michelle Malkin: "What Julie Myers is to the Department of Homeland Security, Harriet Miers is to the Supreme Court. It's not just that Miers has zero judicial experience. It's that she's so transparently a crony/'diversity' pick while so many other vastly more qualified and impressive candidates went to waste. If this is President Bush's bright idea to buck up his sagging popularity-among conservatives as well as the nation at large-one wonders whom he would have picked in rosier times. Shudder."

National Review's David Frum: "The Miers nomination, though, is an unforced error. … Nobody would describe her as one of the outstanding lawyers in the United States."

American Spectator Blog: "There is now talk of among some conservatives about a filibuster of the Miers nomination. …According to several White House sources, few inside the building took the possibility of a Miers nomination seriously. Now that it's a reality, they are stunned. 'We passed up Gonzales for this?' was one conservative staffer's reaction."

Instapundit: "Perhaps they'll change my mind, but so far I'm underwhelmed."

Public Advocate: "The President's nomination of Miers is a betrayal of the conservative, pro-family voters whose support put Bush in the White House in both the 2000 and 2004 elections and who were promised Supreme Court appointments in the mold of Thomas and Scalia."

RedState.org: "Color me less than thrilled . . . I just can't think that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job."

National Review's Corner: "It's an inspiring testament to the diversity of the president's cronies. Wearing heels is not an impediment to being a presidential crony in this administration! I can only assume that the president felt that his support was slipping in this important bloc, and he had to do something to shore it up."

Powerline Blog: "A Disappointment: Harriet Miers, that is. I'm sure that she is a capable lawyer and a loyal aide to President Bush. But the bottom line is that he had a number of great candidates to choose from, and instead of picking one of them-Luttig, McConnell, Brown, or a number of others-he nominated someone whose only obvious qualification is her relationship with him."

Southern Appeal: "I am done with President Bush: Harriet Miers? Are you freakin' kidding me?! Can someone - anyone - make the case for Justice Miers on the merits? Seriously, this is the best the president could do?"

Right Wing News: "Disaster, Thy Name Is Harriet Miers: George Bush's decision to appoint Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court is bitterly disappointing. Miers is a Bush crony with no real conservative credentials, who leapfrogged legions of more deserving judges just because she was Bush's pal."

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/03/right-wing-peanut-gallery-hits-miers-hard/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. You think she'll face opposition from Repugs in Congress?`
It would be interesting to watch the hearings if she's blasted from both sides of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you. I needed that
heh heh heh RW in conflict. Lock step tripping up. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. seems to me this is Roberts comments-as they were not satisfied that
he was Right wing enough either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. not a victory for us...but a defeat for them
i have basic/intrinsic distrust of *bush and anyone that associates with him, but i will reserve final judgement about harriet miers until the hearings and confirmation...in the meantime, its so much fun to watch the rethugs squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattomjoe Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Southern Appeal: "I am done with President Bush"
Hey, what a coincidence! Now that you've helped re-elect Bush to his second term, he's done with YOU!

Morans.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC