|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Dees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:14 PM Original message |
You couldn't pick two bigger duds for SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. No Judicial History to question: DINGDINGDING - we have a winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevolutionStartsNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. This was my biggest argument against voting for * in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. Replacing two Stanford Law grads with Southern Methodist grad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butchcjg (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Rhenquist never judge....over 1/2 of justices never judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Everyone knew from day one that the SCOTUS was the target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. they may appear to be duds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. One who won't talk about what he believes or show paper trail, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-05 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. oh yeah? Wait til Shrub's next one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC