Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disrespectful or common sense?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
preciousdove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:07 PM
Original message
Disrespectful or common sense?
Due to the massive search and rescue mission in NOLA body recovery got shoved aside and then it appears f--ed up and forgotten.

We have systems for cataloging everything why not this.

Something that is scannable and unique that can be attatched to a bodies scattered without the person having to handle or recover the body. Anyone in the party could quickly input the information and if the body was already tagged the scanner info would come up and eliminate duplcations.

(If they do one of the walmart deals you could even do a radio scan for the bodies if they somehow were disappearing.

It would say (if available) name, sex, age(any guess is better than none), race, GPS of body location or location by address or intersection. That would have created a list for retreival AND it would allow you to know if the body you are passing today is the body you passed 4 weeks ago two blocks over or a new one. It would have been a whole lot easier to do it 4 weeks ago. Dmort can only process 140 bodies a day that is going to take months at this rate and the bodies get worse by the day. (they seemed to have misplaced a few thousand in the personnel change over last week).

BTW a Duer posted today that friends just returned from NOLA report bodies still in standing water. They did a better job of body recovery and identification for the Titanic than they did with all our technology in 2005.

(I believe that either the media needs to get on this now and we need an investigation or the families need to file suit to release records and force those who have been sworn to silence by contract and privacy laws about their part in this are allowed to legally speak. It costs a small fortune to prove someone dead without a body.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. the criminal neglect here is two-fold . . .
first, that armies of rescue workers armed with axes and chainsaws were not dispatched to cut into every residential attic in the city within two or three days of the flooding . . .

and second, that the bodies of those who perished because of this criminal neglect are not even being systematically retrieved weeks after the event . . .

there's a special place in hell waiting for those responsible . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC