Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK I'll say it. Delay isn't going to jail.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:45 PM
Original message
OK I'll say it. Delay isn't going to jail.
be honest with yourselves people. IT won't be so disapointing in the end.

:cry:

BTW the LaRouche people are handing out Anti-Bush stuff in the tunnels here in Houston. I donated a coupla bucks for a Improve Texas without DELAY bumpersticker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
larryepke Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably true.
But if we get the schmuck out of office and out of power, that's a net gain anyway!

I suppose Boy George could pardon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. FUCK ALL THAT NOISE! THIS THREAD PISSES ME OFF SO MUCH!!!!
ARRRG BEING A PESSISMIST IS NOT THE SAME AS BEING A REALIST!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thank you......
That money laundering charge carries up to life in prison. He won't get life, but I doubt highly that he'll simply skate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
algerhiss Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. If Earle had the goods...
He would have charged with the real crime first...

He only threw out money-laundering after the first indictment was attacked. I don't think he has the goods.

Besides, politicians rarely do real time anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Earle didn't charge anyone the Grand Jury did
The jury saw a ton of information and has been reviewing this case for over a year. In fact there was more than one Grand Jury involved and all saw evidence of a crime having been committed by Delay. I think one of Delay's cohorts has turned states evidence against him. He is going to be fighting for his life as a free man and not just his leadership role in the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. So says the greatest legal mind of the 10th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
50. Wrong. It's an "ongoing" investigation. The "new" charge just happened
to come up at the right time. The RWers are spinning it as "the other charged wouldn't float and that is why the new charge came out." THAT is total bullshit. There could be MORE charges coming. I HOPE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. With your help, I'm sure he'll be free in no time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. Are you the former or the latter?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. The scandal is what's legal, IOW.
Wouldn't be the first time. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Why would they indict on a case when the crime wasn't illegal till
years later? That seems to be effin stoopid if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Why do you assume that's true? After all, it's Delay's claim, innit?
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 05:09 PM by dicksteele
I haven't seen anyone actually PROVE that that claim is true.
And in light of all the other CRAP he's been claiming
about this case, I'm sure not taking his word for it!

He KNOWS he's busted; all his squawking is just
propaganda aimed at saving his career.
Convictions won't matter if he can convince his
constituents that it's all just a "liberal conspiracy" to
frame him.

EDIT: Just found this on another thread,
so my instincts seem to be correct:

On the contrary, the Houston Chronicle interviews
a law prof at UT (http://http//www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/3380481)
who says that DeLay's lawyers' contention
that the original indictment is flawed is itself bogus ...

George Dix, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law
who is an expert in criminal law and procedure,
said he doesn't believe changes made to the Texas election code
by the 2003 legislature have any effect on the conspiracy charge.

The penal code's conspiracy charge allows for the charge if the defendants allegedly conspired to commit any felony, including an election code felony.

Just because the election code was "silent" on the penal code provision until 2003, it doesn't mean it wasn't a valid charge before 2003, Dix said.

"To me it just says, 'We really mean what we said implicitly before,' " Dix said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
algerhiss Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. If you were charged with conspiracy...
Would you buy that train of bullshit?

"Just because the election code was "silent" on the penal code provision until 2003, it doesn't mean it wasn't a valid charge before 2003, Dix said."

DeLay is corrupt, but saying shit like that is like saying impeaching Clinton had something to do with perjury.

Things can be crimes despite not being writte in the code? You're sounding like a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. In 2003 they clarified the code. Get informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. The LaRouche people scare me
:scared:

And I am not easily frightened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Hey
the enemy of your enemy is your Friend - sometimes. The main thing now is to get rid of Bush and the Repukes. I'll take all the help I can get -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, not this time. However, he thinks things will just blow over and get b
back to his "normal".

They won't, I"m thinking 06 and 08 will be really ugly for the blackhearted thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with you.
Delay won't spend one day in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course not. There will be a fine, perhaps.
But actual jail time is NOT even a possibility.

The only REAL justice on the horizon
is the damage this does to the future
of some criminals who pose as politicians,
and to their organized, criminal association
which poses as a political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Why do you think he will be fined? If he is found guilty I think he'll do
some time. One of the new charges carries up to life in prison. I'm not saying he'll get life, because we all know that won't happen. What makes you think he'll get by with just a fine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I agree. I expect nothing even remotly approaching justice in
this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. That is what I'm saying but people
here apparently want tinkerbell to tuck them in at night. What is up with the fantasy world stuff here @ DU. First if the indictment wasn't on something that wasn't a crime on the books till years later we knew they wouldn't put his ass in jail. Now!!! To find out that the indictment is fulla shit is just the cherry on the top. Which will colour any other thing they have going even if it is good or not. I just don't get it. Why is everyone so happy about some shit that is gonna be a let down is totally beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. Your talking about the first indictment....
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 08:50 AM by converted_democrat
The two new indictments have nothing to do with the 2003 law. The two newest charges stem from new evidence that was just brought about a week or two ago. With all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about.

edit for my awful spelling and to make clearer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Were DeLay's numbers that far down before the first indictment?
I heard on some news show that he was at 27% approval.

Was that correct, do you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Even if there is a jail sentence, Bush will pardon that roach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bush can not Pardon Delay for a State Felony
Bush only has the power to grant pardons to FEDERAL CRIMES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yeah
Like Goodhair won't do the job for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. A Majority of the Board of Pardons has to approve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigersumtin Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. thats good
made he will do time. If he gets there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
47. Gonzales tortueboy was on that board years ago, right?
good times, good times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigersumtin Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I do believe that
Governor Rick Perry can pardon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
48. Nope, he cannot do it alone.
The majority of The Board of Pardons would have to approve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. My Bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course. The rich and powerful always buy their way out of justice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think if he's found guilty, he'll do some time.
The money laundering charge carries up to life imprisonment. I know he won't get life, but if he's found guilty he'll do time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. doesn't matter - we all know he's a criminal now.
every last american does.


if he did go to jail, he could be a martyr - but nope - he's just ethically disadvantaged and morally corrupt and we all know it.


granted it would be more fun if he went to jail.

but rich white men never go to jail for stuff.


rich white women - possibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Do not give LaRouchies any of your money!
Please, buy a bumper sticker online from an unaffiliated group or make your own on cafepress or something. You are just contributing to the bizarro cult like indoctrination of other lost, generally young people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. I was just so excited to see anti-* people
in TX I didn't think. Then afterwards I read the lil booklet and was like WTF did I just do. Then I was like I think I'm supposed to not like these people. By then it was too late. Then I thought any enemy of * is a friend of mine. I'm kind torn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm fine with that.

I prefer him to resign and spend the rest of his days on this mortal coil friendless, utterly exposed and in ill repute and ignored, essentially bankrupt, and walking the beach in San Clemente muttering to himself.

I don't want him incarcerated- I want him to inescapably epitomize Failure and Corruption Exposed while still alive and able to talk, a la Nixon. That's the true equivalent of capital punishment for a politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hey, if O.J. Simpson could walk...
...so can DeLay. But hopefully enough damage will have been inflicted on his career on the Hill that it won't even matter. Maybe he'll hole up in some rural cabin and never come out again. That would suit me just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think he's going to serve actual jail time
His attorney will never let that happen and DeLay won't take one for the team. If/when it reaches the point that he has no other options he will squeal like a piggy. At best I expect a deal resulting in reduction of charges and a probated sentence and fines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. Rostenkowski probably thought
the same thing about himself. Is he still around???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. I was only hoping for run out of office in disgrace, myself
Jail time would be gravy. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. Repuke at work pointed out that politicians never go to jail
I agreed - just shrugged it off. I think it's funny that he felt compelled to tell me that, but historically speaking, he was correct. I felt no need to pursue it any further...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
37. No. Not jail. Prison.
:evilgrin:

Hey, I can live and dream and hope, can't I? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
40. It is easy to be pessimistic....
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 08:34 AM by RSchewe
I wouldn't be so quick to surrender. Delay still has links to Abramoff and that case is still pending. Who knows how many other charges he may have brought up, and I don't mean from just Ronnie Earle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
43. DeLay will spend at least three years behind bars
They've got im. He was under oath and told Earle he approved the $190,000 check with a proviso that $190,000 be returned to individual candidates. Now DeLay is claiming he "mispoke".

He's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
49. 30 year max for conspiracy...
LIFE max for money-laundering. Brings a tear to my eye and a smile to my heart.

:) :cry::)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
51. Don't be so fucking sure of yourself....with all due respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC