Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Democrats Look Good for 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 02:04 PM
Original message
Senate Democrats Look Good for 2006
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2005/10/05/senate_democrats_look_good_for_2006.html
Senate Democrats Look Good for 2006

Chuck Todd updates his 2006 Senate rankings: "It could be worse. That's about the best spin we can put on the battle for the Senate these days if we were in National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairwoman Elizabeth Dole's (R) shoes."

"The makings for a Democratic advantage are brewing. There's no difference between netting three Senate seats and netting six or seven. Once the Democrats are in a position to net a third, it probably means all those slightly-leaning GOP seats are going their way and the gain will be closer to six than to two."

Top Ten Most Vulnerable Seats:
Pennsylvania (Santorum-R)
Rhode Island (Chafee-R)
Minnesota (Open-D)
Maryland (Open-D)
Missouri (Talent-R)
Montana (Burns-R)
Ohio (DeWine-R)
Washington (Cantwell-D)
Arizona (Kyl-R)
Michigan (Stabenow-D)
(check link for details)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stabenow is not that weak.
However, I am very concerned about Maryland and Steele. We need to assure a D victory there with Ben Cardin. Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive_realist Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cantwell is not weak either.
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 03:15 PM by progressive_realist
The R's have thus far been unable to come up with any worthy candidate to oppose her.

And Katrina seems to have temporarily rendered the R's impotent in this state. The only issue they get any traction with here is tax cuts. But post-Katrina, people are starting to wonder if maybe they want government to provide them with some services after all.

I suspect this is going to cause quite a few R's to sit out the 2006 elections, both as candidates and as voters.

(edit for clarity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC