Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could they sail the U.S.S. IOWA to Iowa (on the Mississippi River)???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:03 PM
Original message
Could they sail the U.S.S. IOWA to Iowa (on the Mississippi River)???
Is it deep enough? I ask because San Francisco seems not to want it there as a museum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. It draws a LOT of water. I doubt it. But that's a neat idea, perhaps
they could pontoon it to raise it.

And, without fuel or ordnance it would be lighter.

My uncle was on the crew when it was still under construction. He was a radioman on board all through The War. I would love to see it someonewhere it would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Might have some trouble with bridges. Guess they could blast 'em?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. ROTFLMAO
OMG that was funny!:rofl: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Likely not.
All I see that far upriver is barge traffic. Shallow draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wonder about all the Locks too
They might be wide enough, but maybe not deep enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. that would cost alot of money to move it there
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 11:08 PM by don954
It would have to go south through the panama canal and then back up north, a few thousand miles at least. The fuel & Hands required would be very costly... not to even talk about draft and bridge clearance, i just checked marineplanner.com, the bridges wouldnt allow it even if they could barge it in..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That sucks, how far up river do you figure it could go?
If it could get up to Memphis, it might still be a good tourist attraction.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think Baton Rouge is about as far upstream as ocean-going vessels can go
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bo44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. The daily asswipe in Stockton is trying to marshall the civic energy to
bring to our inland seaport near our new minor league ballpark. Do not bet against the freepers that control my city. If they can get a couple of billionaire developers behind putting the Iowa in Stockton they will do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. IIRC it draws about 23 ft
maybe less without being fully stocked - even fewer if machinery removed...

still , likely - no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am pretty sure it's draft is too deep & mast too high
It would be one helluva sight, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. If they can tow a submarine to Muskogee, Oklahoma....
they move a battleship to Iowa. The Army Corps of Engineers can do the dredging and all those sixteen inch guns on the Iowa can drop all those pesky bridges they encounter. Oh, who's going to pay for this fiasco?
:evilgrin:

http://www.ussbatfish.com/batfish-stats3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I bet they could divert some of the Pork from the new Highway bill
And since it's an old War Ship, you know they will jump at the chance to replace all those OLD bridges. :sarcasm:

And I do think they could tow it, if they dredged that muddy old river. Or not.

Maybe they could disassemble/reassemble the super-structure too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not so fast says this Iowan.
We're still trying to get the USS Des Moines up the river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. What's that, a Cruiser or a Destroyer?
How that going? What have they said the problems are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'll bet it was a cruiser.
During WWII the Navy named crusiers after cities and battleships after states. Destroyers were named after dead war heroes, like the USS Cushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I was kidding. The USS Des Moines is a heavy cruiser
and is in drydock rusting away until someone rescues her. Another great old WWII ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Her sister ship Missouri
lies in anchor at Pearl Harbor. She never came to Missouri. Locks and dams, shallowness of the river (even after being ruined by the Army Engineers) are the probable reason. There's more below the waterline than between the water and the deck.

I saw the Missouri in San Francisco in the 1980s. There was a line a mile long to take the tour. One kid wore a shirt. He was too young to have picked it out himself. His dad must have. Anyway, it said LIBERALS VERSUS AMERICANS. That Limbaugh crap was just getting started.

Soon, those bastards will have their own choice: Bush... or AMERICA. Bush... or the CONSTITUTION. Bush... or (anything else that is good and decent)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. We have the U.S.S. Alabama down in Mobile Bay that I still need to see.
But I think it would be cool if they could get the Iowa up near Iowa for the Mid-west tourists.

Hey, could they sail it to Chicago? Not that they could float it down the Chicago River/canal, but Chicago could be cool too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Numbers are close, but the Iowa is to long and to wide for the St Lawrence
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 09:17 AM by happyslug
The St Lawrence Seaway are just to short and narrow to be able to handle the Iowa but there are plans to widen and lengthen the locks. Once widen and lengthen than you have to deal with that 1819? treaty that prohibits more than two naval ships of the US or Canada on the Great Lakes. I do NOT see Canada objecting to the Iowa being ported on the Great Lakes but the treaty does exist and the US would have to at least ask permission to port the ship on the lakes.

St Lawrence Locks:
766 feet long
80 feet wide
depth: 30 feet

Iowa Specs:
Draw: 28 feet.
Length is 888 feet 11 inches
Width 108 Feet, 2 inches

For Locks of the St Lawrence see:
http://www.glsls-study.com/waterway.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Isn't the Iowa going to Stockton, CA instead?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I don't think that's set yet. Still working on the $$$$ problem...
...acording to a poster above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. The upper Mississippi only has a 9 Foot channel , USS Iowa draws 28 Feet
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:01 AM by happyslug
USS Iowa:
Draw: 28 feet.
Length is 888 feet 11 inches
Width 108 Feet, 2 inches

Now the City of Pittsburgh had the USS Requin SS-481, shipped up the Mississippi and Ohio River System on a Platoon System, but it only had a 17 foot draw Fully Loaded (Less empty). By putting Platoons on each side of her she was able to get to Pittsburgh through the 9 foot deep locks of the ohio Locks. I do NOT think you can lighten the Iowa enough to get her to draw only 9 feet of water (The Iowa "average" Draw is 28 feet). Now US Battleships turrets are removable (On the Battleships the turrets were installed AFTER the haul was completed and launched, other than that it would be to heavy to launch). I just do not think even with the turrets removed and hauled up to St Louis in separated Barges could you get the Iowa up the Mississippi. Reducing the draw by 19 feet would require massive platoons that would tie up the Mississippi for the time period it moves up the River.

Now the first lock on the Mississippi in just up river from St Louis, so width and length is NOT the problem till you want to go up river from St Louis. Below St Louis the problem is how much water does in draw i.e. how much of the ship is below the water line? As finished that is 28 feet. I can not find the minimum channel depth on the Lower Mississippi but in the Locks on the Ohio and Upper Mississippi the channel is 9 feet. Thus you have to at least raise the Iowa 19 feet just to get it to St Louis. Once at St Louis you have the locks to worry about.... The locks looks to be wide enough (110 Feet) but NOT long enough (600 feet compared to the Iowa's length of 888 Feet).

Just not possible to move such a big ship up a river.

For Information on the Upper Mississippi:
http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/SNT/noframe/ms137.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_River

Lock No 14 is 600 Feet Long, 110 Feet Wide:
http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/PublicAffairsOffice/iowawaterresources/underway/underway.html#Lock%20&%20Dam%2012,%20Mississippi%20River,%20Iowa%20(Major


Specs for USS Iowa:
http://www.ussiowa.com/Specs/USSIowaSpecs.htm

USS Requin (Presently in Pittsburgh):
http://www.carnegiesciencecenter.org/exhibits/requin.asp
http://www.geocities.com/uss_requin/tour.htm
http://www.geocities.com/uss_requin/tour.htm

The USS Des Moines draw is 26 feet, 716 feet long, 76 feet wide.
http://www.ussdesmoines.com/stats.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. Right after they get the U.S.S. Kansas to Kansas...
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 01:48 AM by MercutioATC
http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-k/bb21.htm

Yeah, she was broken up in 1924. My point is that just because somebody names a boat after your state, it doesn't mean she's "coming home" when she's decomissioned. Battleships do not belong in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC