Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The only thing this appointment could be about is self-protection from ..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:24 AM
Original message
"The only thing this appointment could be about is self-protection from ..
.... from impeachable offenses.

By appointing his personal lawyer after appointing a Chief Justice who helped him out in the 2000 Florida election, he is "stacking" the court with justices who will protect him and his colleagues at all costs. After all, Miers kept Bush from one particular jury duty which, had he served it, would have exposed his DWI arrest record before he even had a chance to cover it up.

As it stands, the court will protect even more White House secrets than ever, against any and all investigators. After all, Roberts didn't have to release personal memos that had direct bearing on his beliefs. And the old GAO case about the energy scandal remains a big win for White House secrecy. This appointment is insurance: the Harriet Miers policy. No more close votes in Bush's favor. In case there is an impeachment effort Bush will be safe from inquiry by counting on his court (i.e. his lawyers) to protect him.

Nothing psychological there. Bush is as astute as ever, as are those around him who also fear indictment. When will the Senate wake up? This is not about Roe v. Wade; this is not about favors to big business through eliminating business accountability; it is not about gay marriage. The only thing this appointment could be about is self-protection from impeachable offenses. How great to have your own lawyer sitting on the bench of the highest court in the land?

From A Lawyer and a Justice by Justin Frank on October 5, 2005

Link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/justin-frank/a-lawyer-and-a-justice_b_8424.html


Perhaps.

But, as they say, timing is everything and Bush need Miers on that Court, "yesterday."

Now, he's going to have no chance of her being confirmed because those hearings are going to be side-lined by the reality that Georgie boy and his fellow neconster criminals are about to face way more than his and Cheney's impeachment.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow. amazing. so obvious but i hadn't thought of that particular angle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bushco's "get out of jail free" card = Mier/roberts on the bench nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. This would be the final branch of Gov. under their arm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. I said this a few hours ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Tie the process up in knots. Don't let cronyism tilt the court.
Go to the mat on this one. I did not advise going to the mat on Roberts because Roberts had experience and skill. Miers doesn't have either. She's a sycophant. But just as importantly, Bush does not have the mandate to shift the court to hard right. Tie the process up in knots. Give no ground. Make it take as long as it takes to defeat this nomination.

Get Bush out of his comfort zone by forcing him to re-nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Roberts would preside over the impeachment. Miers would probably
have to recuse herself from doing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC