Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN BREAKING!!!! Karl is playing let's make a deal!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:21 PM
Original message
CNN BREAKING!!!! Karl is playing let's make a deal!!
no guarantee he won't be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. On T.V. or web?
Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No link - on The Situation Room w/Wolfie eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is going to give more testimony
short, quick piece - but WOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. It's as Lawrence O'Donnell suggested... the target letters were bait.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-odonnell/plamegate-the-next-step_b_8447.html

Excerpt:

Fitzgerald does not have to send Rove or anyone else a target letter before indicting him. The only reason to send target letters now is that Fitzgerald believes one or more of his targets will flip and become a prosecution witness at the pre-indictment stage. A veteran prosecutor told me, "If Fitzgerald is sending target letters at the end of his investigation, those are just invitations to come in and work out a deal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. That's makes good sense to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. After he blows their cover...
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM by fooj
He'll be indicted! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I knew that Rove wouldn't go down without a fight!

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Libby going DOWN....
Couldn't be more obvious...

Libby will be indicted and KKKARL will walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But, but...
The aspen leaves are turning pretty colors and, um, Scooter is such a cute name for a grown man and he's been awful nice to Judy Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Judy gave them something on Rove to protect Scooter
and it backfired because Rove is a slime and he'll do anything to protect his own worthless tush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Hey that's a good theory
Judy's of course first priority is her neo-cons, Libby being tight with Cheney. Rove is the one they can afford to sacrifice, not Libby because he leads to Cheney who leads to every ball of wax there is.

So now Rove is outing Libby in new testimony, but it doesn't absolve Rove completely. So we get Libby on more counts..Rove on the original counts..and Judy and Scooter on conspiracy and perjury. It's a dream!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
94. You forget Cheney, the un-indicted conspirator.
Now, that's a dream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. Yep Fritz has split the WH
There's the Bush team and the Cheney team and they are about to slice each other up.

Go for it guys, cause it's been a long time coming. Just keep your fingers off the fucking nukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #66
89. It reminds me of the story of the 'splodin' snake from Wednesday:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #66
113. This is going to be sooo good!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
87. BREAKING STORY!!!!
Attractive white girl missing! Film at eleven!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. No, no, no
Instead, NYC subways threatened. AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. OMG did you guys hear Tom and Katie are going to have a baby?!
That is HUGH!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. Coming up:
Tips on how you can save gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gort Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #93
117. Where are the buses?! Where are the buses?!!!!
The subways are threatened and Mayor Bloomberg isn't getting people into buses....oh, I forgot, Bloomberg is a Republican.....Why didn't Nagin send up those buses from New Orleans?!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #88
134. Or, "Missing attractive white girl threatens NYC subways!"
Gotta pull out all the stops for this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And on the third day, he will rise again from the dead
and sit at the consultant's table for the Monkeyboy.

As quick as they nail him is as quick as Dumbya will pardon him, IMO. The only way they will stretch that scenario out is if he can stall incarceration with an appeals process...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Scooter's Gotta Be Shittin' Bricks
Larry O'Donnell does it again...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-odonnell/plamegate-the-next-step_b_8447.html

And if I'm Judy Miller...I wouldn't be looking for too many astor trees for too long. That little cell you used to call home, may be more permanent soon. Her days of playing press martyr are almost over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep.
It's happening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Question
How does this square with your theory of the case?

Does this fit the model or is something different going on? (In your opinion, of course...I value your opinion in this matter above many others)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. It fits very well.
A couple days ago, I wrote a little essay ("German Shepherds and the Berlin Wall") that detailed how a prosecutor/investigator breaks a case. Among the things I quoted was something from Woodward's new book, "The Secret Man." From page 91: "(Felt) gave me a little lecture about breaking a conspiracy like Watergate. 'You build convincingly from the outer edges in, you get ten times the evidence you need against the Hunts and Libbys. They feel hopelessly finished -- they may not talk right away, but the grip is on them. Then you move up and do that same thing to the next level."

This is what has occured with Rove. You may also recall that I have posted at least a dozen times a quote from Wilson's book: (page 444) "....when Rove learned he might have violated the law, he turned on Cheney and Libby and made it clear that he held them responsible for the problem he had created for the administration."

I said last June that Karl was being pressured by Fitzgerald, and would, in time, break. His personal make up is such that any investigator would target him for being a weak link when the pressure is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I don't know how
I missed your post with the quote from Woodward's book, (page 444) "....when Rove learned he might have violated the law, he turned on Cheney and Libby and made it clear that he held them responsible for the problem he had created for the administration."


Given that quote, and the fact that Judith Miller is apparently very close to the VP's Office, I think Rove may be "turning" on Libby and Cheney because he thinks they have made him the fall guy.

This should be good. :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

Thanks for the info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. He got caught in
two lies when Cooper testified. He has been freaking ever since. Miller's testimony was an attempt to protect the VP's office.

Expect fireworks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
78. I think Ruskin's statement is proof Rove is at LEAST guilty of perjury.
And I think Rove requested to testify again to make sure that none of the bigger charges like conspiracy or espionage would stick to him.

The last part of Ruskin's statement is telling:

"The special counsel has confirmed that he has not made any charging decisions in respect to Karl," Luskin said.

Of course they haven't made any "charging decisions". Isn't another word for charging decisions "indictments"?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #78
106. Fitzgerald is now
turning the pressure on. We have some strange days ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Wasn't both Cheney and Libby on AF1 while Rover was in D.C.?
I forgotten some of those details. Sure wish I had time to do a timeline. Are you aware of a link that has created one?

This is so exciting!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I don't think Cheney was.
Keep in mind that the memo that was faxed to Powell on AF1 came from Armitage. He was aware of what Powell had found at CI the weekend before Colin's lies to the UN. While the memo is important, I would suggest that those who read it before the AF1 ride are of far more significance than those who were exposed to it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
79. But Ari Was
and he faxed the document to Rove in the WH. Now it has never been the source of much conjecture but wasn't the conclusion on one of the Plame threads that they were maybe trying to set Powell up as the fall guy, but that Armitage did an end run about that (we think) when he testified. Could be at that time that Rove figured that by having Ari send him the fax (which presumably they already knew about) they might be able to make a case for Powell being the source. Looks like it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #79
107. Didn't work.
Dick A. is a smart man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
99. No they were not
Bush only took a handful of his closest staff with him on that trip. Some, if not all, of the WH officials pictured below are involved in the Plame outing.

Cheney & Scooter may have made sure Plame was on the agenda. Big question, who asked Powell to create the memo that he brought with him?

However, it was Bush who approved of the smear campaign and it was from AF1 that Rove and Libby were called to start the wheels in motion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
83. How many levels are there left?
You build convincingly from the outer edges in....

..Then you move up and do that same thing to the next level


The next level is Bush/Cheney.

Hmmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #83
108. Right.
At least once a day for the past four days, I've said on DU that I'll bet it ain't much fun hanging out with Dick Cheney right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
98. That's just beautiful H20 Man!
You sum it up just right.


And HEY - anybody remember that picture before the 2004 election where Rove was in front of the plane and we were (some of us) were speculating that it looked like he was having a major meltdown? The WH said it was "a joke"..... doesn't seem like a joke now - the crapola must have been hitting the fan then.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #98
105. That picture
spoke loudly. I know that look. It's a man who knows he was exposed for lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. Kinda reminds you of Agnew's situation during Watergate...
Nixon had to dump him but quick prior to Nixon being taken out of office. Funny thing, it was on Oct. 11th, 1973. This October Surprise Fitzgerald may be putting together makes Cheney's ticker even more suspect.

Shrub would get to pick a new Veep...Who do you think that'll be ?

In any event, this is "death by a thousand cuts". Chinese water torture by media. That 70's Show (Watergate) all over again. Will there be a Peace Is At Hand moment with Iraq ? Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. It seems that Dick
is a worse crook than Spiro was. Hard to do.

I've thought for some time that this would rock the administration to an extent that would result in James Baker taking over. As "VP" in the manner that Cheney is. I had, of course, not expected the extension last July. But this is a fascinating time, and I think it could make Watergate pale in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #112
116. truly?
Do you really think the crooks will go down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. I think that
the combination of the Plame and the neocon spy scandal combines Watergate and Iran-Contra. In Watergate, more officials were held responsible. However, it was largely a domestic operation. Iran-Contra was in many ways more significant, although a couple errors and then pardons kept people from paying the penalties they deserved.

This case may be more significant, because Fitzgerald and McNulty may have combined to uncover the institutionalized criminal behaviors that brought us the Iraqi war, among other things. It could result in significant charges that go beyond what the first round of indictments brings. It could, if our congress were up to doing their job, result in a serious investigation of the administration.

Yes, I think it may be something that young people on DU tell their grandchildren about. I am a true believer in the Constitution and the idea of the separation of powers. I still believe in America .... just not the Cheney/Bush version. I believe in something that has honor, and I think Fitzgerald and McNulty do, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #118
127. Wow - I hope so.
I have my older two children following this story from the beginning. I make them watch the crooksandliars video clips, and Olbermann and everything that makes the news about it.

They think I am silly and that nothing will ever happen to the President or anyone in his adminstration over this - but I can't help feeling that I am witnessing history.

Lets wait and see, yes.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #127
129. Very soon
your children are going to know you were right. It is hard for young people to be able to put this into the proper context, because the world that they exist in is very different than that which was the late 1960s and early '70s. Many of the advances in technology have, unfortunately, hindered young people's ability to process information in other than the "now" mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #129
132. And remember that WashPost editor Bradlee was friends with Helms of CIA
and has an intell background himself while in France; Woodward, also with intell background, ends up doing much of the legwork and keeping the story alive ... nowadays Pincus and a few other connected reporters are keeping the story alive on Miller and eventually Operation Mockingbird (or today's version of the project). This HAS TO become part of the Plame investigation since in order to "out" the agent the media HAS TO be compliant, since the editors have to be letting the story through.

For crying out loud Barbara Bush was sued by Philip Agee when her book alleged he outed Greek CIA personnel; the facts are the names were already known by East German intell who published the names. Not that this makes Agee some kind of hero for what he did, but he did win his case and Barbara Bush settled with Agee. Very interesting scenario there.

So, why would Novak's publisher put the story in print ? THAT is a really good question IMHO. And why would the MSM put it out on The Mighty Wurlitzer ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #132
133. One might think
that this would have caught an editor's eye, considering the content and context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. We're showing our age, H2O Man. Institutional memory is needed
badly in today's world. The old farts with it have probably been forced out of the 'journalism community' or are busy promoting the old discredited Op Mockingbird format. Criky, some MSM are even using the military's canned reports and subing their monikers onto it as 'their own'.

Laziness. But I see Daniel Schorr at Christian Science Monitor is onto the story so hope springs eternal !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #110
126. Hariet Miers?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #105
135. This photo?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
115. That may be why Libby could say that Miller's testimony would help him.
And he, apparently, wanted her to waive the confidentiality and talk to Fitzgerald, at least about Libby.

How sad for them all.

:evilgrin:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. I Think This Is To Drag Things Out
Kinda like a kid with a bad report card...he takes the looooong way home...or the bill you don't want to see...is the last you open.

I'm sure Rove and the rest, through their sources, have an idea that Fitzgerald is about to lower the boom on their heads and now it's a game to play for time. By Rove testifying like this, it may force Fitzgerald to extend the GJ for another term (not that he needs to use all that time)...or have to recall other witnesses and re-check facts.

Remember, boooosh has all but indicated Rove won't go unless he's convicted. This now sets up enough confusion and diversion that could put off any indictments for several weeks and pushes any possible trials past next year's election. This is damage control and creating a distance where testimony gets blurry and jurors get tired and fatigued by a case that just drags on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rove Said to Testify in CIA Leak Case

By JOHN SOLOMON
The Associated Press
Thursday, October 6, 2005; 3:21 PM

WASHINGTON -- Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer's leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President Bush or others.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/06/AR2005100601024.html

Watch this for updates:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=Karl+Rove&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
70. Rove ASKED to testify! SQUEAL PIGBOY! SQUEAL!
"they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted"

I guess that's why Fitzgerald was so cool back in July telling him, "We'll get back to you".

:bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #70
91. Coinciidentally, he looks a LOT like Ned Beatty in Deliverance.
Plus he's got a real puuurdy mouth ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #91
95. Oh boy. Where's Swamp Rat when you need him?
I'd love to see Pigboy in a compromising position!

Seemslikeadream? Anyone know how to do it out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #91
125. John Daly on Letterman tonight said Rove has a HAIRCUT that says,
"what's it gonna take to get you in this LeSabre?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #125
131. Heh -- That's a great line!
If only he were some sleazy car salesman ripping off customers in some dreary little town somewhere ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rove Vs. Cheney
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. That's how I read it
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. I think there may be a split between the neocons
and * loyalists. On one side is Cheney, Libby, Runsfeld, Miller et al and on the other are Rove, *, et al. This could get very interesting. :evilgrin: I still wonder what Powell, Teney, and Fleischer are saying and whether they have turned on them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
76. So George loves KKKarl, more than Dick?
It is hard to believe that * would turn on Dick -- damn, I want a crystal ball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #76
101. I am sure Bush has always resented Uncle Dick
I don't think they like each other at all. It all about power for those two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Typical-that fucking weasel
will doing anything to save his own ASS. After all the lives he's ruined over the years! Damn it-if it's not CHENEY I want Rove to go down! No one deserves it more but Cheney. God, I hope Fitzgerald doesn't believe anything he says unless it matches with everything else he's got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. what I like about this story so far
is that they are saying that there is no guarantee that, even with this fourth testimony, there is NO GUARANTEE he won't be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. "no guarantee" is not reassuring... why would he testify more if he
didn't think it would benefit him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Mule Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
52. That's easy - he's shit-scared!
Fitzgerald has him where he doesn't know whether to shit or go blind. At this point I think he'd rat on his own mother if he thought there was even the smallest chance of leniency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
59. because he's convinced he will go down
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 03:09 PM by gkhouston
unless he throws someone else under the bus in his place? I think Rove is a coward at heart. If he's truly backed against a wall and it's finally penetrated his consciousness that the only way out of this is to give up Cheney or even Bush, he'll do just that, if it will possibly lighten his own punishment.

on edit: There might also be the mindset that if he's going to go down, he will not take the blame alone. He would resent being made the scapegoat... who wouldn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. Fitzgerald for President!
What I like is how smart & through Fitzgerald's being. He played Rove perfectly, & I'm starting to think he played Judith Miller too. He's gathered so much evidence at this point that Rove can't lie, & somehow still got Rove to testify w/o immunity. He's a very good prosecutor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
69. keep fitz where he is doing the work that he's doing. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Do I smell an Attorney General?!
Wouldn't that be something. No crooked politician would be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Even if he's not indicted this won't be good for his career.
Who will trust him now, ESPECIALLY if he turns on all his buddies? Think Rafael Palimero (sp).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. who trusts him now? loyalty is based on fear, not trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. But what can he do if he has no more followers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Think rover got caught in a lie or two after Miller's testimony? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. In either
Time or Newsweek, the week after Cooper testified, it was reported that Rove's attorney called Fitzgerald to ask if he wanted to see Rove again. Fitzgerald was blunt, and made clear he was calling the shots.

Back in June 2004, on the infamous Plame threads, we discussed the office of the president being in conflict with the office of the vice president. I remember saying that Karl would break, and tattle on the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Original message
you always have great analysis of all the good stuff H20man
your posts are some of the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
55. Thank you.
I've always taken an interest in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Quisling goes Vallachi
Creepy is as creepy does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wolfie just promo-ed it again - its coming up on CNN after the break
let's hope they got more than the teaser they announced already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. I will be disapointed if Rove walks and someone else is sacrificed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. They don't normally cut you a deal to go down the food chain.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 02:37 PM by Jim__
If Rove's giving somebody up, it's somebody above him. That may not be disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I hope you're right but I can't see Rove pointing at Cheney
who else is there above him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
97. Why can't you see that?
IMO, Rove and Cheney probably have power issues with each other. Bush's Brain believes he should be in control while of course, Darth Cheney believes he should. Alot like sibling rivalry.

Karl could easily rat out Cheney and still save Bush (he needs him for a pardon).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jesus--why do I smell another Rove plan hatching??
I'm thinking Rove does Cheney. Bush "reluctantly" tosses Cheney. And whatever Next Nazi they want to be President assumes the position. No need to put a short in Cheney's ticker that way.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. Thats just the smell of your paranoia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
74. Cheney just bought a house in ST MICHAELs MD
Maybe he is planning on taking the fall, making a bundle in the private sector, working behind the scenes...after he gets his pardon, of course. And then they can pick out the monkeyboy's successor at their liesure....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #74
120. Which was his first job in the first place!
And brings us full circle to where all this shit started after the Selection!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Add in Rove's Attorney's comments
Before accepting the offer, Fitzgerald sent correspondence to Rove’s legal team making clear that there was no guarantee he wouldn’t be indicted at a later point as required by the rules.

Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, said Thursday he wouldn’t comment on any ongoing discussion he has had with Fitzgerald’s office but that he has been assured no decisions on charges have been made. Rove would first have to receive what is known as a target letter if he is about to be indicted.

“I can say categorically that Karl has not received a target letter from the special counsel. The special counsel has confirmed that he has not made any charging decisions in respect to Karl,” Luskin said.

He said that Rove “continues to be cooperative voluntarily” with the special counsel investigation and “beyond that, any communication I have or may have in the future are going to be treated as completely confidential.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. Fitzgerald is fucking brilliant
I expect Libby to go in for further testimony too!

This is gettin' good!

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. I know - it feels so good to see that stuff on the news
I am just on the edge of my seat - and I have to leave now to go tutor - argh!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
65. yes, it's been well worth the wait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. Prediction
Noone gets indicted. Noone gets fired. Medals of Freedom all around. Business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
72. "abandon hope all ye who enter here"
Doubt Fitz and Grand Jury share your gloom and doom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
86. Add in a few Presidential pardons
...and you're getting close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
121. I'll believe it when I see it.
We've been down this road before - too many times, unfortunately.

We can always hope and pray, tho - and keep the faith!

We must remember that truth has always prevailed in the end.

No matter how long it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. I've never said this before on this forum, so bear with me....
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM by tx_dem41
THIS IS HUGH!!!! :)

oh....

and SERIES!


Silly mode off. This has made me step away from the "wait and see" camp to the "hopeful" camp. I believe now, that indictments are definitely on their way. Now the key question is how high up will it go. Apparently, from this story, Scooter is being set-up as the fall-guy. Don't let it happen, Scooter!!! Sing like a pigeon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL! TRUTH BE DEMAND, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
48. They say the 1st deal is the best deal...
So will rove be the first to dive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
49. Rove's attorney said that he DID NOT receive a target letter...
hmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. But it could have been a phone call, or an email.
There are many ways to tell part of the truth and avoid acknowledging the whole truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. ... and they ARE politicians.
It is all over CNN! Scooter and Tate won't return their phone calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Always assume everything a lawyer says is true, but never assume
that it isn't hiding something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
75. Because no Target Letters went out
Target Letters are only sent when somebody is called to tetify.

These letters were specific about an intent to indict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #75
103. Help me out here
I have heard on the "news" shows that target letters are to inform people that they WILL be getting indicted in the near future. Is that wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. That is wrong, target letters inform witnesses
they are a target of the investigation. Not that they will be indicted.

Two completely different things.

Rove has been a subject (as opposed to a target) of the investigation from day one, as has all of the the winesses. He was informed of that from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #104
128. thank you for that. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
122. And "there are no plans to invade Iraq on my desk" either, rember?
Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
50. But Rove can take the 5th
unless he is granted immunity, in which case he cannot be prosecuted for his crimes, only perjury...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Why would he volunteer to re-testify if he's gonna plead the 5th?
That doesn't seem to generate a useful outcome for Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #54
80. I don't know...
Maybe he thinks he can give non-answers and get out of there, maybe he thinks he can take the 5th and they WON'T give him immunity, maybe he is stalling... I was just pointing out that if he does testify, that could mean some kind of immunity and no indictment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
53. Its on again...
discussing how "lying to the grand jury" and how Fitz may be going for the "cover-up" and not the leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. As we old enough to remember have oft said, it wasn't the break-in
but the cover-up that sank Nixon.

I hope the cover-up goes well into the executive suites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Amen, heresince1628
may the cover-up bring them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
61. I hope kkkarl has been sweating bullets of late
contemplating such things as prison rape, prison gangrape, what it would feek like to be forced over and a large penis inserted violently up the poopshoot.
It may be one of kkkarl's worst nightmares forcing him to squeal like a piggie, I hope whoever sits above on the target list has the same thoughts going through their evil mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Karma is only as nice to you as you are to the world
Let's hope he only gets what he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #63
123. Which then would hardly rule out the above, would it!
Hee hee hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #61
84. Gannon already taught him how to take it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #61
136. Hope he enjoys it
He has certainly fucked enough people in the ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
62. AP Reporting Same (link)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th-hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer's leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CIA_LEAK_ROVE?SITE=CATOR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-10-06-15-25-27
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. thanks for the link!
I have been too glued to the tv and this thread to venture far - keep hoping for more nuggets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
67. MORE....
Begala on - "I think its odd" "his attorney is no longer denying he got a target letter" "Karl has a day job, he's supposed to be running the Katrina relief effort"

Republican - "there are some little strings left over from Judith Miller"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
68. THANK YOU PAUL BEGALA!
"What is being overlooked here is the threat to national security"

Wolf saying he was not covert.

"Anyone who helped us, is put in the position to not help us again, to put it delicately"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #68
81. Wolf said Plame wasn't covert?
that's ridiculous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
73. Like rats in a pail,
they will eventually turn on each other to try and save themselves, but will only succeed in cannibalizing each other. While Fitzgerald takes the pictures and makes the notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #73
119. Oh what a lovely visual!
and boy, do I hate rats. I've seen long-time friends, even families sometimes, turn against each other, over lesser things than jail time. Money, usually. I hope they are turning big-time - matter of fact, since I think all of them are cowards, really, I'm pretty sure they're turning big time....big rats in a little pail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #119
124. We all know a few things.
They are all selfish, greedy, hypocritical, lying bastards.

They are NOT honerable or gentlemen.

They are all slimy crooks.


This will make for some good entertainment for us, that is sure!

Do I want alcohol, popcorn or sweets for this one?

Decisions. Decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
77. The theories are interesting
H2O seems to have it nailed IMO. Great thinking people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
82. Hahahahahahaha!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
85. Question - what potential charges does Rove face?
...and more importantly, how much jail time would he see if charged and convicted?

If it's a significant sentence, he could be squealing like a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #85
92. treason. punishable by death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
96. Cheech Y Chong "Leeeets Make a Dope Deal!!"
That's what I think of when I see that title. Close enough to reality for me :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
100. I think Fitzgerald solved the presidential pardon problem
All along I've been worried that no matter what happens, dimbot would just pardon everyone.

Apparently Fitz has flipped Cheney's "aspen cluster." Now it looks to me like he's flipped Rove too. What's the one thing dimbot values above all else? Loyalty. He's not going to pardon anyone who flipped. And it looks like a pancake party now with all the flipping.

But if Fitz still cares about flipping people as high up as Rove and Libby, that means he's got his sights on even bigger game. And the only bigger game in town are Cheney and dimbot. I think the house of cards is going to do a spectacular flameout.

:toast: :bounce: :popcorn: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #100
111. If indictments come won't resignations immediately follow ?
What are the Vegas odds for a new VP ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
102. Really...
Who can we "TRUST"?

snip>

Chertoff is being kept out of the media, because the people he works for OWN the media. If chertoff goes down, he'll take the entire house of cards down with him.


The title of the article “Trading Privacy (Freedom) for Security” quoting Admiral Studeman belied the past and future attempts of HW Bush, GW Bush and their appointee, Michael Chertoff, to push for loss of freedoms to fight terrorism (PATRIOT Act flaws and FISA court violations by Ashcroft and Chertoff).

In the immediate aftermath of 9-11 former President GHW Bush publicly advocated suspension of the US Constitution and violation of laws by the DOJ and CIA and FBI agents inside the US to allow domestic spying on Americans. This is what Presidents GHW Bush and GW Bush and Chertoff have had in mind all along when they intentionally helped create the terror pretexts they have used to illegally and immorally trade American freedoms and privacy for a false sense of security.

Michael Chertoff was the US Attorney appointed by HW Bush and retained by Bill Clinton for New Jersey from 1990-1994. As US Attorney for New Jersey Chertoff was deeply involved with the 1993 WTC bombing sting operation using FBI monitoring of the Abdel Rahman and Salem’s recruited cell members at the Al Salaam mosque in Jersey City. The US Attorney from New York who worked with Chertoff to prosecute the 1993 WTC bombing case was Patrick Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald is also conducting the federal grand jury investigating the illegal outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, the wife of Ambassador Wilson who investigated claims of uranium acquisition by Iraq. Chertoff and Fitzgerald were fully aware of the statements made by prosecutors admitting that the FBI intentionally had provided the safe house for Salem terrorist recruits. MORE...

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www_de.cgi/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/09/14/knight-ridder-homeland-s_n_7319.html

These people make Al Capone look like a Sunday school teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
109. Fitzgerald won't play that game.
Not unless Rove is going to squeal on someone higher up than him, aka either Cheney or Bush.

But that would just prove what I knew all along, Rove is a big fat pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
114. They're all trying to scramble to play "Let's Make a Deal"
But someone has already been decided on:

“I can say categorically that Karl has not received a target letter from the special counsel. The special counsel has confirmed that he has not made any charging decisions in respect to Karl,” Luskin said."

The "in respect to Karl" may mean that they've made charging decisions in respect to someone else. And Karl is going in to do some testifying. The special counsel love to make a deal BEFORE the indictment. Saves time and money and rolls over a lot of rocks for them. Something is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #114
137. It could also mean
that the Special Prosecutor has not decided WHAT KIND of charges he will make against Rove. It doesn't mean he is not going to make ANY charges.

For example, according to the legal work on this done by Henry Waxman, Rove CANNOT be charged under the Espionage Act with outing an undercover agent because he would not have had access directly to the information.

What he COULD be charged with is not keeping the agreement he signed, when he realized, after Novak asked him about Plame, that her identity was about to be published. He was obligated then, first to tell Novak not to publish the information, and second, to report it to the proper authorities. Instead he 'confirmed' Novak's information and did nothing to stop the outing of the agent.

My suspicion is that initially, to defend himself, Rove may have said 'but I did not know she was undercover and merely confirmed that she worked for the CIA'. However, other witnesses may have testified that he DID, after they were threatened, as H2oman said, by Fitz, (the lower level) with perjury charges or whatever.

The worst that Rove could be charged with for his part in outing her, is not keeping his signed agreement to report and stop such outings, which AIRC, does carry some jail time, and a fine, or probation. But he may have lied also to the Feds, and that would add more charges, like Martha Stewart. He may also have been involved in other stuff, maybe conspiring to out her. So conspiracy charges could be added.

The top tier, ie, Bush, Cheney and some others who would have had access to the information about undercover agents, ARE subject to the most serious charges, Waxman says.

Rove had to get the information from somewhere ~ what Fitzgerald probably needed to know was, who told Rove and how much did he know, ie, did he know that Valerie Plame was undercover, and did he know about her network of spies etc. I'm sure he denied all that initially.

Same thing with Scooter Libby ~ he too merely 'confirmed' what the reporters asked him about. He too, cannot be charged for outing her, only with not preventing it, once he realized someone was about to do so. And then, the same as Rove, lying to the Feds, and maybe conspiracy ~

The lower ones, Hadley, Gonzalez, et al, I don't know what they could be charged with, but AIRC, Gonzalez, after he was told by Andrew Card I think, waited 12 hours to do what he was supposed to do.

Judith Miller's role is still a mystery, but Fitzgerald must believe she was more than just a reporter who had a source, but did not use the information. If Libby gave her the info, then he did commit a serious crime.

What I can't remember is where Novak claimed to have gotten the information. Oh, yes, he said two administration officials. Wow, this gets more and more complicated. And then there's the Chalabi/Miller connection!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
130. I hope the deal is...
KKKRove will testify to the fact that Bush and Cheney knew about Plame and ordered the leak to Novak to get even for Joe Wilson's op-ed piece. How many people who face life in prison don't cover their asses by singing? Man, I so hope this goes to THE TOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC