Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Rove's "Confidential Conversations" W/Dobson Scuttle Miers' Chances?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:32 PM
Original message
Will Rove's "Confidential Conversations" W/Dobson Scuttle Miers' Chances?
Alleged conversations between Senior White House Advisor Karl Rove and Christian Conservative James Dobson may wind up costing Harriet Miers a seat on the Supreme Court.

Ironic, isn't it? Rove was trying to help President Bush by landing a key endorsement from Dobson, a prominent Christian conservative.

On the Oct. 5 edition of his Focus on the Family radio show, Dobson discussed "confidential conversations" he had with friends and supporters of Miers -- conversations that led him to believe Miers was against abortion rights. In the same show, Dobson offered endorsed Miers' nomination.

The Christian Science Monitor later reported that Dobson supported Miers after "extensive lobbying by the White House," while the New York Sun said White House senior adviser Karl Rove did the convincing. Paul Weyrich, founder of the Free Congress Foundation and one of the capital's leading conservatives, said Rove placed four telephone calls on Oct. 2 or 3 to Dobson.

Not surprisingly, the "confidential conversations" didn't sit well with Senators from both parties who sit on the Judiciary Committee.

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the senior Democrat on the Committee, said Miers had told him she'd made no promises as to how she'd vote on any issue that might come before the court, including Roe v. Wade.

"If assurances were given of how any nominee, whether this nominee or anybody else, and somebody gives assurances how they're going to vote in an upcoming case, I would vote against that person,'' Leahy told ABC's This Week.

Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) said he will investigate whether Rove gave Dobson assurances.

If Dr. Dobson knows something that he shouldn't know or something that I ought to know, I'm going to find out," he said on This Week. "The Senate Judiciary Committee is entitled to know whatever the White House knew."

Committee member Charles Schumer (D-NY) said should be called as a witness during hearings next month on Miers's nomination.

"Karl Rove ought to let the public know what kind of assurances he gave James Dobson,'' he said on CBS' Face the Nation.

***

And there's no shortage of non-religious right conservatives who would like to see the Miers' nomination scuttled. If it's because of Dobson's big mouth, so be it.

Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS), who is exploring a run for president, emerged from an hourlong meeting with Miers on Thursday and said he was prepared to vote against her.

Conservative pundit Pat Buchanan said on NBC's <em>Meet the Press</em> that Miers' "qualifications for the Supreme court are utterly non-existent."

"This is a faith-based initiative," he said. "The president of the United States is saying, 'Trust me.' And when you have the decisive vote on the United States Supreme Court, that is not enough."

The Weekly Standard, a bible for dyed-in-the-wool conservatives, today called the choice of Miers "at best an error, at worst a disaster" which should be reconsidered.

"The best alternative would be for Miers to withdraw," editor Bill Kristol wrote. "Her nomination has hurt the president whom she came to Washington to serve."

***

This item first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad to see they are looking into this
Dobson doesn't deserve inside info any more than I do. You'd think with his ass on the line over Plame, Rove would learn to keep his fucking mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rove is messing up a lot lately
That's what happens when you're worried about being indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm hoping that he will be just as careless while in prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm glad Dobson is letting his fellow Christians know
he is actually close to Rove! Rove is anything but a Christian, so we all can see the kind of company this Dobson fellow keeps! Real Christians? NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. 100% right. Bet nothing comes of it though.
The arrogant loser who calls himself president, won't budge on this nominee. There's those famous words: "Trust me."

Why should we trust the world's most prolific liar. "Shame" indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. m'kay "her nomination"
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 09:27 PM by votesomemore
Her "nomination" has "hurt the president"? You ever know anyone who is intent on self destruction? That would be George.
HE'S the one who NOMINATED HER FER CRISSAKES!

She has no BRAINS. Anyone notice? She gets all excited when she hands George some typed papers or he says something semi-sexy to her. Sheesh. I don't think the other SCOTUS want to have to play keep up with her for the rest of their natural lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. If Dems were in power in the Senate, Dobson would be subpoenaed.
Don't count on the Republicans subpoenaing him, but in this climate, they just might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC