|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-09-05 11:54 PM Original message |
Why on earth would Clinton ever appoint a turn-coat like Louis Freeh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-09-05 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. it was a compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. now we know why they wanted him in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. OK, so why didn't he fire him? These people all serve at the pleasure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 01:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. because it would have looked political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. I never thought the Republicans liked him much, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Freeh wasn't around then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Larry Potts. Freeh was criticized for "covering up" for Potts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I was thinking of Potts. I thought Freeh was a deputy director before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasquatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. Clinton was always trying to work with the other side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. yes, he was and still does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Well, Cohen still seems to be one of the good guys, even though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. you're right about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I don't think he is anymore! He was back in 92 though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
10. probably because it didn't make that much difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracyindanger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
12. Opus Dei |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
14. All I know is, looking at Freeh's face,especially his eyes...I would NEVER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
16. I don;t think Clinton has ever understood what he and we were/are facing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-05 05:04 AM Response to Original message |
17. In this regard Clinton is a brainless wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC