Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Victoria's Secret Backs Down (a little) Horror continues!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:18 PM
Original message
Victoria's Secret Backs Down (a little) Horror continues!
Ok, I couldn't help it. An update on this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4995721&mesg_id=4995721

This wasn't just VA it seems, there was also "outrage" in WI!

Victoria's Secret tones down suggestive displays

Victoria's Secret stores in McLean, Va., and Wauwatosa, Wis., are targets of the latest clothing controversy. Local residents are railing against scantily clad - and provocatively posed - mannequins: women on all fours, others intertwined on a bed, still others in "garters and whatnot, and the only thing missing is a whip," says Stan Zurawski, who's leading the charge in Wauwatosa.

It's a familiar cycle: Retailers ratchet up the raunch because they want to be edgy. Concerned shoppers react with neighborhood meetings and protests, and the company tones things down. (Remember the now-defunct Abercrombie & Fitch catalog that showed topless models?)


In McLean, concessions have meant, among other changes, straightening up and flipping around a thong-wearing mannequin whose largely bare derriere had greeted passersby. (Opponents are still not satisfied: A second protest is planned for today after a gathering Friday drew 40 to 50 people.)


In Wauwatosa, a reclining mannequin has been turned over so that its thong-clad bottom is no longer "mooning" the window, as Zurawski put it. But that's "absolutely not good enough for us," he says.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20051010/en_usatoday/victoriassecrettonesdownsuggestivedisplays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Chasity Belts?
New line for Victoria if the Religious Right have their way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. what a bunch of sex-obsessed whack jobs who need a life, send them
to Iraq, give their lives meaning ...fuckheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Controversy=PR=Money
I admit to enjoying sexually repressed people get worked up :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. "i see mannequins"
really isn`t there something more important than plastic people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Absolutely good enough" for McLean and Wauwatosa...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. VS has lost its touch of class
A couple of years ago it began gearing toward the overtly sexual instead of the comfortably feminine. It has also "redesigned" its bras in order to jack up the prices. I use to love VS but they've lost me as a customer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. me too, instead
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 07:01 PM by seabeyond
of empowering the women and let them play, it is play for the man. i liked how in the past it was about the woman, not the man. lost me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Victoria's Secret Passion Collection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hate to admit it but I agree with the local shoppers. I'm so tired of
retailers pushing sexual, degrading conduct to young women. Hope women revolt and just quit buying this crap and stop supporting companies that have no respect for women. Women on all fours in highly suggestive sexual poses belong in love shop windows and in private bedrooms, not malls.

What are we saying to young women? Act like this and you too can be beautiful and successful? What a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. The real reason Victoria's Secret sucks
They carry a *really* narrow range of sizes. If you've got a smallish frame or are full figured, you're SOL. For what they charge they ought to be able to keep more sizes in stock or special order a cute bra in an odd size but apparently if you're not a 34B-38D they don't want your cash.

Assholes. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC