|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:08 PM Original message |
Bu$h's TAX REFORM on CNN now... F'r lays another TURD, 75% sales tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Do you mean 7.5%..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. aparently with the repates it is about..50% they say,, heavy on Middle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. If you can't afford it up front, ain't gonna be any rebates. Or sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-13-05 12:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. that is the point, do destroy the economy declare martial law.. take over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. Holy mackerel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. 75%!!!! You wouldn't have to worry about impeachment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. they want to destroy the economy so they can declare Fascism..!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. how can they keep a straight face talking about this Bu$h Shit..??!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. I'm with you on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Ahhh... Corporate Slavery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Man, a 75% sales tax would cause a REVOLT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Oh you'd see much more than #'s dropping! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. They're getting desperate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. With bush's 75% sales tax if a person bought a $20,000.00 car.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. You misunderstood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. Did bush say 75% or was it someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newportdadde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. This idea floating around is one reason Roth Ira's make me nervous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eglide (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Do you have a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. How about a simple Flat Tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. a flat tax is, by its very nature and definition, regressive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. what would you call it then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Flat taxes are NOT progresive by definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 01:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. i said they were REgressive, not PROgressive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. They're flying trial balloons, to see how much the public will tolerate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-13-05 12:28 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. lets send a message now.. lench them all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC