|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
tgnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:28 PM Original message |
President Hastert? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dudley_DUright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. He is already DeLay's puppet, so if DeLay goes down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Three word: President Roy Blunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. I suspect it would be marked by more gross incompetence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. it would be even less consequential than the ford presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. Didn't Siebel Edmonds hear about Hastert's bribes from Turkey? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tgnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. OK. Let's say Hastert sidesteps. Next in Line is Senator Ted Stevens, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Whoever took over, would be facing a serious budget crisis as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would probably look something like this if it worked out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. talk about a lame duck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clmbohdem (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. You are assuming the House would start impeachment proceedings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tgnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Let's say there is a trial, it's completed at the end of next year, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melissinha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. No, no NO! President Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hastert would be doomed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC