Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When is the last time a Supreme Court Justice who wasn't ever a judge was

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:24 PM
Original message
When is the last time a Supreme Court Justice who wasn't ever a judge was
nominated?

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. He just died
William Rehnquist never served as a judge before SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And his rulings will long live in enmity IMHO as do all those whose
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 06:32 PM by indepat
ideology trumps the Constitution and the law and common sense, and....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know there has been one since...
but wasn't Taft the Chief Justice w/o any judcial experience?

the presidency doesn't count.

whalerider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I have a book relatives gave me, when I was little, about the presidents
And according to it, he spent nearly two decades as an officeer of the court, and as a judge. "Pictoral History of American Presidents," by John and Alice Durant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe Earl Warren had not been a judge...
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 06:51 PM by MnFats
...but he had been governor of Cali.
/...a bit more demanding job than running the Texas state lottery if you ask me.

he led the charge on a number of progressive decisions. at that time you could see a lot of 'impeach earl warren'' in parts of the country that are today known as red states...


Earl Warren was an immensely popular Republican governor when President Dwight Eisenhower appointed him to the Supreme Court. Ike later regretted his choice; he had hoped to appoint a moderate conservative; Warren proved to be an unabashed liberal.
Warren joined the Court in the midst of one of its most important issues: racial segregation in public schools. The new Chief proved an effective leader (unlike his predecessor) by bringing the Brethren from division to unanimity on the issue of racial equality. At the end of his service, Warren concluded that his greatest contribution to government was his opinion in the reapportionment cases. However, his contribution to racial equality still stands as a testament to his role as a leader extraordinaire.
In November 1963, President Lyndon B. Johnson called on a reluctant Warren to serve as a member of the special committee to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. When first approached by the Attorney General Robert Kennedy (brother to the slain president), Warren declined. He was concerned that such service would tarnish the Court's legitimacy. But in this secretly recorded telephone call, Johnson explained to Sen. Richard Russell how he persuaded Warren to serve.
In a public address following his retirement for the Court, Warren articulated his strong commitment to the principle of equality and admonished Americans that they face continued strife and upheaval by failing to heed the rightful demands for equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. a good man...
i've always felt that the weight of his positive influence on america helped offset his profoundly misguided internment of japanese americans during the war when he was CA attorney general.

whalerider


who does believe in redemption.
but believes much more in the likelihood of stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC