Arianna had a post on Russerts role recently.
THE BRAD BLOG: "Tim Russert's CIA Leak Accounts Don't Match Rove's & Libby's"
(video links at beggining of this post)
NBC Today reports that Rove and Libby were "comparing notes about what they were hearing from reporters" before Novak first exposed CIA officer Valerie Plame's cover in an article on July 14, 2003.
Sources close to the investigation say Rove told Libby that he learned about Plame from Novak and Libby told Rove that he learned about Plame from Tim Russert. By process of elimination, we believe that this "source" is probably Rove's lawyer who is known to have leaked other information to the media.
more...
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001937.htmThe Blog | Arianna Huffington: Russert Watch: Let Me Count the Ways | The Huffington Post
(snip)
Well, the exact same conditions exist at NBC: Tim Russert is a participant. He was interviewed under oath by Fitzgerald. And, like Miller, he has an obligation to explain to the public just exactly what he knows as a result of his involvement in the story.
So now that Judy Miller and the New York Times have spoken (however incompletely), what about Tim Russert and NBC?
Here is how Russert handled the latest developments in Plamegate (the question is addressed to Michigan Senator Carl Levin):
"The New York Times today publishes a lengthy article about the CIA leak investigation. Judith Miller, the Times reporter, writes that she had at least three meetings with the vice president's chief of staff, Scooter Libby, in which they talked about Ambassador Joe Wilson's trip to Africa regarding uranium and also some discussions about Wilson's wife. What is your reaction?"
That's it. Not a single mention of his own conversation with Libby. What does NBC think about this? As Judith Miller herself might say, "I don't know."
more...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/russert-watch-let-me-cou_b_8983.html