Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Hackett for US Senate in Ohio! Why Not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:27 PM
Original message
Paul Hackett for US Senate in Ohio! Why Not?
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 07:37 PM by leftchick
I read my mojo today about Paul and I have to say this guy has that certain something to win. Why are more Democrats in Ohio not behind him? Ohio DUers? Fill me in please....

http://motherjones.com/news/update/2005/10/firing_back.html



<snip>

Paul Hackett, the Iraq War veteran who narrowly lost a Congressional bid as a Democrat in an overwhelmingly Republican district in southern Ohio this summer, is staying in the race for U.S. Senate in Ohio in 2006. “I'm in this,” Hackett says. “The water's good. Come on in, Sherrod. It's going to be fun.”

The race in this battleground state is already the focus of national attention. “Many see the governor and Senate race in 06 in Ohio as a bellwether of what is to come in 2008,” says Jason Mauk, political director of the Ohio Republican Party. “As do we.” Hackett initially announced his intention to run against two-term incumbent Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH) on Oct. 3. But Hackett was forced to reconsider his plans when, three days later, Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) also jumped into the Senate race. Brown had earlier insisted that he would not run for Senate; Hackett and Brown will now face off in a primary on May 2, 2006.

Brown is a seven-term congressman from the district that includes Akron. He has been a champion of progressive causes, most recently having led opposition to the Central America Free Trade Agreement. Hackett is a personal injury attorney in Cincinnati and a major in the Marine Corps Reserve who returned earlier this year from a seven-month combat tour in Iraq. Hackett’s liberal positions and antiwar stance, coupled with his straight-shooting style and occasional swipes at his own party, won over voters from both parties in his race in southern Ohio.

Democratic Party leaders, who recently hailed Hackett as one of their brightest new stars and wooed him into running for Senate, are now lining up behind their party’s insider. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) has already endorsed Brown for Senate, and the rest of Ohio’s six-member Democratic congressional delegation are expected to follow suit, according to The Hill, the Washington, D.C. weekly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Companion article... very interesting....
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 07:32 PM by leftchick
<snip>

For a candidate who just lost a congressional race, Paul Hackett has been a popular guy this fall. The tough-talking Iraq combat veteran turned a special-election fight in Ohio’s Second District into this summer’s political sleeper hit, energizing Democrats and converting Republicans in the deep-red counties outside Cincinnati and pulling 48 percent of the vote in a district where John Kerry got a mere 36 percent. Soon the national party came courting: Hackett met several times with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Chuck Schumer, chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), both of whom encouraged him to run for the seat of Ohio’s senior senator, Republican Mike DeWine, in ’06. Hackett said he would—after been told by Ohio Congressman Sherrod Brown that he wasn’t planning to run—and on October 3 he publicly threw his hat in the ring.

Then, last week, his phone rang again. It was Sherrod Brown calling to tell Hackett he’d changed his mind: he was running after all. Then Schumer called, and this time he wasn’t delivering a pep talk. Hackett got the distinct sense that he was being asked to make way for the party insider. “Schumer didn’t tell me anything definitive,” he says. “But I’m not a dumb ass, and I know what he wanted me to do.”

DSCC spokesman Phil Singer insists that “We didn’t play any role in bringing Brown in. We were as surprised as anyone else when he decided to reconsider.” Putting a positive spin on the contest, Singer notes that “six months ago, reporters were writing off the state” for Democrats. “Now we’ve got two excellent candidates who would be good senators and can beat Mike DeWine in 2006.”

Hackett, who says he’s still considering his options, is less sanguine—and less diplomatic. “The Democratic Party is like an addict,” he says. “They’re addicted to failure. I want to help the party. The question is, how do you help someone that doesn’t want help?”

http://motherjones.com/news/update/2005/10/hackett.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I stood in the parking lot of a Dollar Store in an urban neighborhood on a
very hot day, accosting everyone who entered the area to tell them about the special election, and to show them why they should vote Hackett.

My theory? It's Sherrod Brown's turn.

Or they saw him on Bill Maher and are worried he's too loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I saw him on Maher's show
he was fucking great! Wtf am I missing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. There was some double entendre slightly gay comments between
Maher and Hackett when Hackett said "Bill I don't know you that well"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dunno. Ohio Dems are dysfunctional
If Hackett runs for Senate he should be a shoe-in. Me thinks there are lots of favors being repaid by established Democrats.

We need a serious shakeup here . The Rethugs are ripe for defeat in Ohio. All we need is a good strong candidate and we could easily take back Ohio. Its been a while since we did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Yeah? F you and the horse you rode in on...
;)

Seriously, you're right. The party here is a bit disorganized.

Of course, it doesn't help when we have candidates changing their minds about whether they're running for office or not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I meet Paul at a get together....
... a few months ago held one block from my house.

Paul Hackett Rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is what I feel every time I see him
That guy has charisma out the ying yang! And he is very smart and articulate to boot. To be fair I have never heard Mr. Brown speak anywhere so I do not know how he compares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sherrod is a true Progressive...Is Hackett a one trick pony?
I'm an Ohio voter and I like both. Hackett is the media darling du jure, but who knows whether he'll make a good candidate for senate. As a trial lawyer, the GOP will have thousands of pages of court transcripts to pour over for a few "money quotes".(JBTW...The MoJo article was in the same volume where they trashed the notion of GOP vote fraud in Ohio in 2004, so I'm not inclined to ascribe any accuracy to MoJo's pick)

Sherrod may not be as flamboyant as Hackett but he's had a stellar career and has not shied away from taking courageous stands in support of the little guy. Like him or not he's a proven commodity and you'll have no surprises. He will also have Union backing and money which is not too shabby in the primary.

Let's have a primary and let the best man win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for that
It is just what I was looking for. I have zero information on Sherrod Brown and a lot on Hackett and I was wondering why. Perhaps because Brown is a proven democratic progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you see more on Hackett because
he's gutty, says what he thinks (he doesn't couch what he says it cutesy politico-speak), is hard working and has charisma. Brown comes across as a politician. You can argue whether being a politician is a bad thing -- I don't think it is. But, Hackett draws in many people that Mr. Brown will never draw in -- Republican, military veterans. Ohio has a lot of these.
Brown's website, announcing his intention to run, was, I felt, rather pathetic and self-serving. On his website he mentioned how he was constantly being asked to run by so many Democratic leaders. He made it sound like he was running at the urging of others, not because he wanted to be Senator. It made me ill.
For me, the bottom line is winning. Hackett is progressive, a veteran (I am too) and he says what he thinks (including his attacks on scrub). This attracts lots of people. This why he has attracted me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bingo!! Like it or not Hackett has wider appeal and can win.
Republicans hope Brown wins because they know they have a chance against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Brown will not play as well in S & W Ohio
population: Cinci/Dayton up to Lima is a huge chunk of the state that votes republican. Hackett has a chance here. There are TWO VFWs in my town of 20,000, and there's three other posts within a 10 mile radius of here. This Friday, I'm going to a DNC fundraiser/Fish Fry, which is at the American Legion Post 20 miles away. If that gives you an idea of what it's like in the Miami Valley...

Brown and his wondedrful progressive record will not play well in burgs like mine. I say this as someone who prefers Brown as a candidate but knows Hackett has a better chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. that is what attracted me as well and
as a woman, hell I hate to admit it but he is damn HANDSOME!! :loveya:

But beyond that I loved the way he came right out and beat up the chimp! Democrats need to know it is OKAY TO BEAT UP THE CHIMP!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. that is what attracted me as well and
as a woman, hell I hate to admit it but he is damn HANDSOME!! :loveya:

But beyond that I loved the way he came right out and beat up the chimp! Democrats need to know it is OKAY TO BEAT UP THE CHIMP!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Brown is a really great guy.
However, I believe that people like Hackett are what we need to change things.

I'm also really pissed that brown told Hackett that he wasn't running for Senate, waited for Hackett to announce, and THEN announced that he was running after all. It smacks of the big-time closed-door politicking that we should be distancing ourselves from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not the first to say it and won't be the last. Time for new blood!!
Hackett get's my 2 cents. I can't vote for him but if all I have to give is my lunch money it's his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hackett is good, Brown is better
Brown is the type of candidate that DU always claim they want-- an outspoken progressive, backs Reform Ohio Now, vocally opposed CAFTA, and tirelessly defends working class Ohioans. When you compared the platform of each Hackett is the Republican-lite, yet is the recipient of a lot of internet support. (Note, you can't compare both their records because only Brown has decades of experience.)

The mystery to me is why aren't all DUers behind Brown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Why? Because he's playing big-time politics...
I believe the party is behind this, but why would Sherrod assure Hackett that he wasn't running for the seat, wait until Hackett announced, and then decide to run?

Sherrod has been a great Rep, but I'm INCREDIBLY dissapointed in him for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Exactly! I mean, Paul Hackett was summoned to Schumer's office
told he was "the man" and "whatever it takes we will do", and all of a sudden Brown, who said he would not be running, says he is, and then all Hackett gets is a phone call from Schumer saying "um, err, uhh"

Fishy fishy my friends in Ohio. It stinketh, and the smell cometh from D.C.. (oops, did I forget an L in there?)

Then also, mention the name Paul Hackett in central Ohio, lots of folks know who he is. Mention Sherrod Brown, and people go "who?"

And as far as SW and West Ohio, in a short notice, special election, everyone better look at the turn around for Paul Hackett in those areas compared to how those areas voted in the 2004 election. Especially the poster who stood outside Family Dollar.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm 100% Hackett in the primary.
However, I won't have to cringe (much) if I have to vote for Brown in the general. He IS a good Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Agreed I just detest the interference from the Hill
they have done an abysmal job in getting candidates elected the past 8 years, and I was hoping they would keep their paws off this time and let grassroots (to mean the actual people who LIVE in Ohio) get their candidates elected without fucking around with the message or delivery method.

Send the candidates the money, and then step outta the way is what I want from the Hill right now. Their meddling has brought this cluster fuck on, and I do not appreciate it much. Their tinkering has now instituted a human cockfight between two fine Dems. And THAT, my friend, is what sucks the most about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. What is wrong with the Ohio Dems? Hacket is clearly the best
choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Is Ohio a Crossover state? Ohio will lose Brown's seat and senate seat.
If it is, repukes will vote for Brown in the primary knowing he doesn't have wide appeal like Hackett does. That will eliminate Hackett. Then they can retake the senate and go after brown's seat. Now Ohio loses 2 seats. That's how it works here in Georgia. Ohio Dems should protect what they have and accept good gains instead of this all or nothing crap. Nothing will likely be the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Very true, repugs can vote in the D primary in OH, all they have to do
is ask for the D ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Guy who has never won anything vs........
A guy who has been reelected to the House 6 times and has already won a Statewide office in the past (Secretary of State). Plus Brown is as progressive as they come.

I'm backing Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Back the guy who can win. That is Hackett
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 09:27 AM by CanOfWhoopAss
Brown cannot win. He doesn't have as wide an appeal. He hasn't held statewide office recently. They will pick apart his progressive record and you will end up with nothing. Hackett has proven he has crossover appeal in the special election. If he maintains a fraction of that support he is the better candidate because Brown could never have made the 2nd district competitive had he been in Hackett's shoes. You bet in sports you bet with the facts not with who your heart is with. You can cheer for the huge underdog but don't put your money on him. Unless you plan on losing your money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curt_b Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. Brown's Record
This post tries to make it easier to understand why some of us Ohioans respect Sherrod Brown. It doesn’t address "the who is the better candidate" issue, but only tries to present an overview of Brown’s positions, votes and actions. As to Brown’s relationship to the alphabet soup of the Democratic Party’s leadership, I point out only that because he was in the leadership of the fight against the Clinton administrations trade policies(NAFTA) and sanctions against Iraq, he is less than a favorite. As to his insider status with the DNC and the DSCC, please examine his record and decide if he seems like a pawn for yourselves. Some my links presented here may be helpful, or use your favorite search engine (search for Sherrod Brown Iraq, Sherrod Brown drugs, Sherrod Brown Wal-mart etc.).

Brown is a member of the Progressive Caucus, The Out of Iraq Caucus and a signer of John Conyers letter to The white House after the release of the DSM. His voting record appears here: http://activote.ontheissues.org/AVA/House/Sherrod_Brown.htm

What follows is quite long, but it seems this conversation will continue for a while:

IRAQ

1) On The Issues
Voted NO on authorizing military force in Iraq. Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq: Passage of the joint resolution that would authorize President Bush to use the US military as he deems necessary and appropriate to defend U.S. national security against Iraq and enforce UN Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

http://www.issues2000.org/OH/Sherrod_Brown_War_+_Peace.htm

2) Powell Scolds Hill Staffer At Hearing, Secretary Also Clashes With Ohio Lawmaker

"...I went and lived at the CIA for about four days to make sure that nothing was," he began, when he paused and glared at a staffer seated behind the members of Congress. "Are you shaking your head for something, young man, back there?" Powell asked. "Are you part of these proceedings? ... Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a 12-year veteran of the House, objected, "Mr. Chairman, I've never heard a witness reprimand a staff person in the middle of a question." Powell shot back, "I seldom come to a meeting where I am talking to a congressman and I have people aligned behind you giving editorial comment by head shakes." "Well, I think people have opinions," Brown responded.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A34636-2004Feb11¬Found=true

3)The Nation September 20, 2003, The People's House by Rep. Sherrod Brown

“For two weeks in July, the people took over the People's House.
Illinois Democrat Jan Schakowsky and I organized the effort. We served as megaphones for hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans who wanted to know more about the deception and corruption swirling about the ongoing war in Iraq. Each night, I chose a dozen missives from among the 3,000 letters from my state of Ohio, and read them to the House, allowing Ohio citizens to speak directly to the Congress and to the American people.”

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20031006/brown

4) March 4, 2003
More than twelve Democrats have written to Speaker of the House of Representatives, J. Dennis Hastert, urging him to allow a fresh discussion before the President decides to go to war. In recent days, Congressmen have taken to the floor of the House to question the wisdom of Mr Bush’s obsession with war against Iraq. Mr Brown warned that a pre-emptive strike against Iraq would send a wrong message around the world.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030304/world.htm#3

5) Eighty-Eight Members of Congress Call on Bush for Answers on Secret Iraq Plan, Raw Store, Thursday 05 May 2005

“Eighty-eight members of Congress have signed a letter authored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) calling on President Bush to answer questions about a secret U.S.-UK agreement to attack Iraq,” (Brown a signer)

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/37/10984

6) (Pre-Invasion) Urgent Action from EPIC

“As an effort to move our nation away from war, REP. SHERROD BROWN (D-OH) and RON KIND (D-WI) are circulating a sign-on letter in the House of Representatives that urges President Bush to commit to the procedure outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 1441. The BROWN/KIND LETTER specifically urges the president to announce his commitment to 1441 in the upcoming State of the Union address on Tuesday.”

http://www.8thdaycenter.org/resources/bulletins/03_0122.html

7) (Sanctions) Conyers’ Letter to Clinton
The delivery date for Rep. Conyers' "Dear President" letter has been postponed (from Sept.15) to Oct. 6. If your REPRESENTATIVE is not listed below, then please CALL THEM and URGE them to sign the letter to President Clinton calling for lifting the economic sanctions on Iraq. ASK them to help bring the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq to an end.
41 Signatures as of 9/22/98:
Sherrod Brown-Middlefield/Elyria

http://www.iacenter.org/iac0924.htm

8)
* Representative Sherrod Brown, a Ohio Democrat who opposed the October resolution, has been joined by two representatives who supported the resolution, Joseph Hoeffel, Democrat from Pennsylvania, and Ellen Tauscher, a Democrat from California, in sponsoring the "Presidential Report on Iraq Resolution of 2003." The legislation would require President Bush to make a public report to Congress on the possible consequences of war with Iraq prior to ordering US forces into such a war. In addition to forcing the President to detail the human, economic, environmental and political costs of a war, the act would require him to submit "a determination that further diplomatic or other peaceful means will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the threat posed by Iraq."

http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030324&s=jnichols
http://www.fcnl.org/issues/int/sup/iraq_resolution220-03.htm

9) October 16, 2002

“At the House International Relations Committee markup of H.J. Res. 114, U.S. Representative Sherrod Brown (D-OH) put forward an amendment that contained a series of questions he argued the administration must answer in order for Congress to fulfill its constitutional responsibility regarding a prospective war, and to gain the confidence of the American people.

http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2002/0210questions_body.html

10) (Sanctions) FEBRUARY 1, 2000
The letter, which was prepared by Reps. Tom Campbell (R-CA) and John Conyers (D-Mich) and was also signed by a bipartisan group of 67 other members of Congress, calls on the President to “lift the economic sanctions” against Iraq:

...More than nine years of the most comprehensive economic embargo imposed in modern history has failed to remove Saddam Hussein from power or even ensured his compliance with his international obligations, while the economy and people of Iraq continue to suffer. (Brown a signer)

http://www.commondreams.org/news2000/0201-07.htm

11) Pre-invasion)
Urgent Labor Antiwar Action Alert
US Labor Against War

As we write this message, less than 12 hours remain... In submitting this resolution, Rep. Brown said, "In the absence of a clear, imminent threat to the United States, the President has a responsibility to present to the American public a full assessment of the possible costs and consequences of taking military action against Iraq. . . . Before we start a war that could cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians, the administration owes the American public a clear-eyed assessment of this war. It would be irresponsible to rush into this conflict without fully acknowledging the potential costs and consequences."

http://www.informationwar.org/labournews/USA_antiwar_action_alert_march192003.htm

12)(pre-invasion) U.S. Senator Russ Feingold on the Cost of War with Iraq
From the Senate Floor, March 20, 2003

... I introduce a Senate companion to a joint resolution already introduced in the House by Congressman SHERROD BROWN of Ohio. This resolution is quite simple. It requires the President to report to Congress on the potential costs and consequences of military action in Iraq before ordering the United States Armed Forces to war in Iraq. This is a resolution that simply requires that this country know what it is we are getting into before, not after, war breaks out.

http://www.senate.gov/~feingold/statements/03/03/2003321545.html

13) (pre-invasion) Dissenting Views Regarding H. J. Res. 114, October 7, 2002
On September 12, 2002, President Bush went to the United Nations calling on that organization to take action to enforce its resolutions and protect international interests in peace and security. We support that call and believe the United Nations must be given a chance to carry out this mission. Therefore, for this reason and those iterated above, we respectfully oppose this resolution authorizing the unilateral use of force and submit our dissenting views.

Sincerely, Cynthia McKinney, Barbara Lee, Sherrod Brown

14) (Sanctions) Kucinich, Members of Congress Ask Albright for Meeting on Iraq Sanctions Policy Wednesday, April 19, 2000

"We feel that the gravity of the public health crisis makes it urgent for us to rethink the sanctions policy at all levels, especially in regard to water purification materials," the letter states. "We recognize that many items needed for water and sanitation purposes are considered 'dual-use' items. But we believe that such items could be safely introduced with a careful system of monitoring by UN humanitarian officials." (Brown a signer)

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/iraq1/iraq39.htm

15) Powell defends war, says he was surprised weapons did not turn up (AP), 2/11/04
But when Brown contrasted Powell's military experience to Bush's record with the National Guard, saying the president "may have been AWOL" from duty, Powell exploded. "First of all, Mr. Brown, I won't dignify your comments about the president because you don't know what you are talking about," Powell snapped.
"I'm sorry I don't know what you mean, Mr. Secretary," Brown replied.
"You made reference to the president," Powell shot back.
Brown then repeated his understanding that Bush may have been AWOL from guard duty.
"Mr. Brown, let's not go there," Powell retorted. "Let's not go there in this hearing. If you want to have a political fight on this matter, that is very controversial, and I think it is being dealt with by the White House, fine, but let's not go there."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-02-11-powell-iraq_x.htm

16) Democracy Now, Headlines for November 11, 2003
“26 House Democrats Call for Bush to Fire Rumsfeld
On Capitol Hill, a group of 26 members of Congress introduced a resolution Monday urging President Bush to fire Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.” (Brown a signer)

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/11/150223

17) Northeast Ohio Anti-War Coalition
Northern Ohio Activists March Again
Dec. 19, 2002 Event Date: Dec. 21, 2002

U.S. Congresspersons Sherrod Brown and Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, and an executive committee member of the AFL-CIO, are expected major speakers

LABOR

1)Professors group to hold rally at UA

“The University of Akron chapter of the American Association of University Professors will rally ... to protest what it views as protracted contract talks. Guest speaker will be U.S. Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Avon.”

http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/12731822.htm

2) A Conversation with Congressman Sherrod Brown

“I think that the whole issue of the developing world is that we need to force the issues of labor and environmental standards, so that workers share in the wealth that they create.”

http://www.results.org/website/article.asp?id=1302

WAL-MART

1)Democrat Holds Field Hearing on Wal-Mart's Business Practices
By Susan Jones, CNSNews.com Senior Editor

“A union-inspired group opposed to non-union Wal-Mart is congratulating Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) for holding the first-ever congressional field hearing on the "negative impact" of the giant retailer's business practices.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=%5CNation%5Carchive%5C200509%5CNAT20050920a.html

2) Business Week
“A half-dozen town hall meetings in places such as Iowa City, Madison, Wis., and Tucson will push for local and state legislation requiring Wal-Mart to pay a higher share of its employees' health insurance, which currently covers just 44% of its 1.3 million U.S. workers.

The meetings will be modeled after a Sept 19 Cleveland State University forum attended by a 100 or so, featuring local business and union leaders as well as elected officials, led by Ohio Congressional Democrats Sherrod Brown, Dennis Kucinich, and Stephanie Tubbs-Jones.”

DRUGS/MEDICARE

1) Article by Brown,Published on June 28, 2005 by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer
US Trade Rep Helps Powerful Drug Industry by Sherrod Brown

“When George W. Bush and the U.S. pharmaceutical industry team up in Washington, you know it's bad news for U.S. consumers. Now they are taking their show on the road -- to Central America.”

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0628-31.htm

2) A House Out of Order
On September 29, a speech by Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) was cut short by the House Speaker pro tempore when Brown spoke out about strong-arm tactics used to secure passage of last year’s controversial Medicare Bill. Before being silenced, Brown called the Medicare legislation scandal a “perfect circle” that included “tens of millions” in campaign contributions from the drug and insurance industry. “It is corrupt, it is shameful and it is morally reprehensible,” said Brown.

http://www.iamaw.org/publications/imail/imail_10_07_2004.htm

3)The Take Back Medicare Campaign, By SHERROD BROWN
The New York Times, January 28, 2004

“Last month, President Bush signed into law Republican-sponsored legislation that adds a prescription drug benefit to Medicare and invests billions of dollars in an effort to lure the elderly away from the government program and into private health insurance plans. Last week, in his State of the Union address, President Bush said the new measure "kept a basic commitment to our seniors." By approving the legislation, the president may have fulfilled a commitment or two, but not to the nation's elderly.”

http://www.ourfuture.org/issues_and_campaigns/medicare/headlines/ssip_20040128.cfm

4) Bush Plan to Increase Generic Drugs Draws Flak By Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writer

"Frankly, the proposal . . . is an insult to American consumers," said Rep.
Sherrod Brown (Ohio), the lead Democratic sponsor of generic drug
legislation that passed the Senate July 31 but has not been brought to a
vote by the House's GOP leadership. The bill overlaps the administration's
plan in certain respects but contains several features Bush does not support that would make it more difficult for brand-name drug companies to keep generics out of the market -- and more powerful enforcement methods if companies flout the rules.”

http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/ip-health/2002-

5) April 2001
HR 1708, The "Affordable Prescription Drugs Act", was introduced in Congress by Congressman Brown on April 27, 2001. It would establish compulsory licensing for prescription drugs, and it would require pharmaceutical companies to disclose financial information necessary to evaluate the prices charged.

http://home.cwru.edu/activism/sherrod.html

6) April, 1999
The Global Sustainable Development Resolution, initiated by Congressman Bernie Sanders (VT) and cosponsored by Sherrod Brown (and others)....outlines a framework for reconstructing the global economy based on labor and human rights, protection of the environment, and new initiatives to encourage socially and environmentally sound national and local development

http://home.cwru.edu/activism/sherrod.html

7) Letter to the Nation by Sherrod Brown

“I appreciated William Greider's November 13 editorial, "If Politics Got Real...," challenging the rationale sustaining this country's laissez-faire attitude toward inflated prescription drug prices. As the author of legislation (The Affordable Prescription Drugs Act) that would codify the compulsory licensing approach mentioned in the piece, I am quite familiar with the "lower prices imperil medical advancement" threat used by the drug industry to protect its current pricing practices.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010101/letter

8)FDA Cracks Down On Canadian Drug,s CBS News

"There's never been one shred of evidence, in my committee or anywhere else, that the Canadian drug safety process is not as rigorous as ours," said Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who co-wrote that letter. He accused the Bush administration of bowing to pharmaceutical companies who provided tens of millions of campaign dollars.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/22/health/main545412.shtml
MULTI-ISSUE

1)From the Right Wing Discoverthenetwork.org:

Brown urges enforcement of laws against importing goods made with slave labor in the Communist Peoples Republic of China. He does this both to improve human rights there and to reduce competition for union-made goods in the U.S. Brown also opposed most-favored nation trade status for Communist China, and he opposes letting Mexican trucks enter the U.S. as permitted by NAFTA. On many issues Rep. Brown acts as a sock puppet and rubber stamp for organized labor.”

http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1514

2) A collection of Brown’s responses to letters posted by a constituents (one example):

Dear Mr. Schneider:
Thank you for expressing your concerns about the Bush administration's claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and the United States' inability to locate them. As the main conflict ended, the 75th Exploitation Task Force started looking for WMDs. By mid-May, the search was shutting down. They had expected to find what Secretary of State Colin Powell described at the UN: evidence of a nuclear weapons program, hundreds of tons of chemical and biological agents along with missiles to carry them. They found nothing.

http://home.earthlink.net/~todd3205/sherrod.html

3) Under the Cover of Darkness by Sherrod Brown (Originally published Dec. 11, 2003 in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

“Never before has the House of Representatives operated in such secrecy:
At 2:54 a.m. on a Friday in March, the House cut veterans benefits by three votes.
At 2:39 a.m. on a Friday in April, the House slashed education and health care by five votes.
At 1:56 a.m. on a Friday in May, the House passed the Leave No Millionaire Behind tax-cut bill by a handful of votes.
At 2:33 a.m. on a Friday in June, the House passed the Medicare privatization and prescription drug bill by one vote.
At 12:57 a.m. on a Friday in July, the House eviscerated Head Start by one vote.
And then, after returning from summer recess, at 12:12 a.m. on a Friday in October, the House voted $87 billion for Iraq.
Always in the middle of the night. Always after the press had passed their deadlines. Always after the American people had turned off the news and gone to bed.”

TRADE
1) Brown seeks to topple NAFTA with new book by Ron Simon

“Brown and other free trade opponents are in the minority, but he argued the public is beginning to see that all free trade has accomplished is to lose jobs for Americans. It has not helped raised the standard of living for those overseas workers who get those jobs, he said.”

http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/news/stories/20050130/localnews/1934118.html

2) 6 myths of free trade from Rep. Browns book Myths of Free Trade: Why American Trade Policy Has Failed

* Myth #1: Corporate globalization is inevitable
* Myth #2: Free-trade agreements help fight the war on terrorism
* Myth #3: Free trade leaves most people better off — rich or poor
* Myth #4: Free trade will bring democracy, human rights, and freedom to authoritarian governments
* Myth #5: NAFTA has been a success
* Myth #6: Free trade is a great American tradition

http://brown2006.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_brown2006_archive.html

3)Remarks of Congressman Sherrod Brown, House Ways and Means Committee Hearing on the Central America Free Trade Agreement

“You’ve got to hand it to the big drug companies. They did an end-run
around U.S. laws and positioned themselves to rake in billions in
windfall profits, and they used an unrelated trade agreement to do it.”

http://www.house.gov/sherrodbrown/CAFTADrugsWandM.pdf

4)The City Club of Cleveland: Congressman Sherrod Brown

A leading progressive voice in Congress, Brown has fought trade agreements that threaten American jobs, undermine environmental safeguards and eliminate workplace safety protections. A fierce critic of NAFTA, he believes international trade agreements should include protections for workers in America and across the globe, including fair wages, decent working conditions and the right to unionize.

http://www.pluggedincleveland.com/events/2091/congressman-sherrod-brown.html

5) At City Club 01.07.05: Sherrod Brown for "Fair" Trade

“He offered a brief background on free trade policy, explaining that before 1990 global trade policy was a below the public radar issue in congress, with limited media interest, handled by commissions and of greatest interest to multinational corporations and their lobbyists. Then came Fast Track, and NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), and PNTR (Preferred Nation Trade Relations). Then followed mounting trade deficits, and the WalMarting of America, and publicity of labor abuse by companies like Nike and the TV pop-star Kathy Lee Gifford, and the complete realignment of the American and world economy.”

http://realneo.us/node/616

6) Interview Free Media December 8, 1999

“I think that US business all over the country -- and US government officials who attended the WTO -- were amazed by the depth of passion and breadth of support for labor and environmental standards that they saw on the streets. Few reporters and other observers predicted the strength of support for these standards, not just from the 40,000 or so peaceful protestors, but also from around the country.

http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/zforum/99/freemedia120899_a.htm


MISC

1)The Death and Life of American Liberalism by Robert Kuttner, The American Prospect

“Conviction suggests character. Sherrod Brown, who represents a northern Ohio district that is partly blue collar and partly affluent suburb, found himself last fall with a friendly group of autoworkers that included both Kerry and Bush supporters. “Why are you backing Bush?” a Kerry man asked a Bush partisan. “Kerry wants to take away my gun,” came the reply. “Well, Sherrod wants to take away your gun,” gibed the first. “Yeah,” said the second, “but Sherrod fights for me.””

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=9713




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elaineb Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Thank you, Curt
Great background on why so many of us Ohioans are backing Brown. Perhaps one of Hackett's supporters can come up with a similar exposition on Hackett?

Bueller?


Bueller?


Bueller?


Oh, wait a minute. I just remembered. He called Bush a bad name or somethin'. And those who support him are dead sure that southern OH won't back Brown. As if this country is even remotely the same as it was four, or even two, years ago. Apparently, we can never again count on a progressive winning a Senate seat in Ohio. Only centrists need apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curt_b Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You're welcome n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Ok it's impressive to me but will moderates be impressed?? Neocons aren't.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 06:18 AM by CanOfWhoopAss
All of that means jack if he can't win the seat. Again, he could never have been as competitve in the 2nd district as Hackett was. He hasn't won statewide office recently as Ohio has swung furhter to the right. Hackett may not be the best candidate but he can win the seat for Dems where Brown may not. It is undeniable that Hackett has wider appeal among independents and moderate repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curt_b Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Re: Ok it's impressive to me but will moderates be impressed?
COWA
I'm really not qualified to argue who would win. I do, however, feel that if a pol is as dedicated to issues I care about as Brown is, he deserves my support. I know the "it means nothing if he can't win" argument is critical to many people, but is outside the scope of my reply to the OP. I thought the OP was asking Ohioans why they would support Brown and my answer was meant to encourage people to examine his record and decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC