Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BushCo Pentagon sets up system so taxpayers pay 20% more for same stuff.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:02 AM
Original message
BushCo Pentagon sets up system so taxpayers pay 20% more for same stuff.

Pentagon program costing taxpayers millions in inflated prices

By Lauren Markoe and Seth Borenstein

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon paid $20 apiece for plastic ice cube trays that once cost it 85 cents. It paid a supplier more than $81 apiece for coffeemakers that it bought for years for just $29 from the manufacturer.

That's because instead of getting competitive bids or buying directly from manufacturers like it used to, the Pentagon is using middlemen who set their own prices. It's the equivalent of shopping for weekly groceries at a convenience store.

And it's costing taxpayers 20 percent more than the old system, a Knight Ridder investigation found.

The higher prices are the result of a Defense Department purchasing program called prime vendor, which favors a handful of firms. Run by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the program is based on a military procurement strategy to speed delivery of supplies such as bananas and bolts to troops in the field.

Military bases still have the option of getting competitive bids, but the Pentagon has encouraged them to use the prime vendor system. At the DLA's main purchasing center in Philadelphia, prime vendor sales increased from $2.3 billion in 2002 to $7.4 billion in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30.

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/12974270.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another good reason to slash the military's bloated budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. And if no one pays close attention to who changed the purchasing
rules, one can easily come away with the conclusion that it will be more cost effective to privatize the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. See that's just crap
Prime Vendors?

Croney capitalism at it's finest.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here is more:
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 11:09 AM by Pirate Smile
""There is nothing prime about the program. In fact, it's very expensive," said Keith Ashdown, vice president of the Washington-based nonprofit Taxpayers for Common Sense. "They have reduced competition and now we're seeing them pay higher prices."

-snip-
"What value is this prime vendor program adding? Zero," Jones said. "We think it's a crooked deal."

-snip-
One manufacturer who previously sold directly to the government but now sells to the prime vendors said the system doesn't make sense.

"I resent it as a taxpayer," said the firm's chief executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing business. "Before we'd sell it to them (the Defense Department) at a hell of a lot less money. I don't make that money on it. Dietary (one of the prime vendors) is making money hands over fist. ... It makes no sense."


A second manufacturing CEO, who also asked not to be identified for the same fear of losing what little business is left, called it "three-card Monte economics." A third company president said the "prime vendor program is mismanaged; the costs are way, way too high." '

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is where OMB is supposed to come in
As far as I recall they set the standard for best-value-for money bids, and are supposed to provide metrics and comparisons.

Gotta love cost-benefit analysis; an ice cube tray is an ice cube tray, so buying a more expensive tray when you know a cheaper one is available to do the same thing, if not the exact same tray, is criminal.

And where are our beloved lawmakers on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Sorry to be so cynical, but maybe our elected reps are quiet
because they are cashing in themselves on this? Just look at what Mr. Frist did with his HCA stock! Why, any ole member of congress could do as swell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afdip Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. an 85 cent ice tray for $20 . . . it's a little more than 20%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. No price is too high to pay for the kind of protection we were
given on 9/11.

:patriot:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Horrendous. Where is all the $$ going?! Area 51, I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You absolutely know it is going to fund some
private black ops slush fund that nobody knows about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree that this is the most likely scenario, followed by other
unknown projects of the Star Wars type, followed by kickbacks.

Those are my best guesses.

It sure as heck ain't going to the low people on the military totem pole either in the form of pay or supplies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fighting inflation is for the "little people" not for corporations.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 11:35 AM by applegrove
:sarcasm: Just like "private health care" increases costs astronomically vs."shared risk national health care model".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC