Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Why Patrick Fitzgerald Gets It"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:43 PM
Original message
"Why Patrick Fitzgerald Gets It"
Just a reminder... if you've been listening to the right wing talking points and all...


Why Patrick Fitzgerald Gets It
By Larry Johnson

Federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald understands very well that something beyond a crime was committed when Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, and other White House operatives spread the name of undercover CIA officer, Valerie Plame, around Washington as part of a coordinated effort to discredit her husband, Ambassador Joe Wilson. Someone needs to alert Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen that he is a nitwit and moron for trying to advance White House supplied talking points that no real crime occurred.
Here are some of the facts that will come out when Fitzgerald ends his investigation:


• Valerie Plame was still a non-official cover officer in July 2003 when her identity was revealed by colostomy bag Bob Novak.

• Valerie Plame had traveled overseas on secret missions using that cover as required under the statute in question.

• Valerie Plame's exposure also almost compromised the identity of other non-official cover officers.

• Valerie Plame did not have the authority to send her husband on the Niger mission and in fact did not make the decision.

Other mental midgets like Cohen, such as Victoria Toensing, continue to insist that no crime could have been committed because Valerie Plame, "worked at a desk job". Newsflash for these so-called Washington insiders who have proven they know nothing about the intelligence community--at least 40% of the people working at CIA Headquarters are working undercover. Just because they may physically go to the CIA building in McLean, Virginia everyday does not mean that their relationship with the CIA is acknowledged.

During my four years of sitting at a desk at CIA I was undercover. My position with the CIA was not even known by my own parents. Only my wife was privy to that secret. Many of the undercover folks still working at CIA are at headquarters on a temporary basis. Some travel overseas on temporary assignments that last less than a month. Others await a semi-permanent posting for a two or three year stint overseas... <more>

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/10/13/21472/723
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. more...
The point that Cohen and the other White House hacks have missed is that protecting the identities of intelligence officers, whether they are working under official or non-official cover, is part of national defense. To compromise these identities is to commit an act of treason.

Patrick Fitzgerald understands that he must prosecute within the confines of the law. However, he also understands that what was done to the wife of Ambassador Joe Wilson was more than a rough game of inside the beltway hardball. Karl Rove told Chris Matthews that "Wilson's wife is fair game". Not only was she an unfair target, but in going after her the White House political crew unwittingly exposed several intelligence assets and caused the loss of intelligence assets overseas.

Richard Cohen is dead wrong to argue that the best thing Patrick Fitzgerald can do is leave town. To the contrary, the best thing Patrick Fitzgerald can do is a send a clear message to politicians in both parties that when it comes to political hardball intelligence assets must be kept out of the game. At the end of the day our nation's security is no game, it is a matter of life and death.


Oct 13, 2005 -- 09:47:02 PM EST

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/10/13/21472/723
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "colostomy bag Bob Novak"
why do you feel the need to insult colostomy bags?
they actually serve a useful purpose,unlike Novakula...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That was stupid addition on the author's behalf
Really dumb, it didn't do anything, made him look like another nasty-name caller very early on, and made it a loaded gun for anyone who forwards that article to a winger - because they'll then have to defend the colostomy bag statement whether it's true or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. ROFLOL!
:spray: :rofl: :woohoo: :spray: :rofl: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Those nasty terrorists ya know
Oh. They reside in the White House. Play ball!
Get them OUTAHERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Fitz has no case no leg to stand on,why then
has Fitz decided to stay in DC for the announcement after 2 years of
investigation? It stands to reason the Fitz has indictments and needs
to continue this in a local Federal Court.If not treason then perjury
and obstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC