Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers withdraws her nomination?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 04:58 AM
Original message
Miers withdraws her nomination?
Have been hearing alot of blather about this. Hearings are scheduled to start Nov. 8

Talkingheads aren't expressing much hope that Miers would survive the hearings and are speculating her nomination will be withdrawn before Nov. 8 - most likely "excuse" would be "for personal reasons". A few of the talkingheads say she's weak on constitutional law and this will hurt her in the hearings.

What do you think? Will she or won't she? Will bush* stay the course with her or dump her? If Miers withdraws - will this hurt/help bush*?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush needs her hearings to distract from Plame Game
When indictments hit, Miers problems will be a welcome distraction. They may send her up, let her get savaged, and then come back with someone his base will dig.

I don't think saving her from agony is in the cards. There's a lot of people with a stick that want a whack at the pinata known only as Harriet Miers.


the spy who shagged me
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually this would be perfect timing to withdraw Harriet...
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 05:19 AM by MessiahRp
It would get the news focusing on Miers a bit more and take some of the heat off the Indictments coming tomorrow (assuming indictments come Thursday as The Washington Note mentioned). It would also turn most of the bad news of Thursday into a one day story that the Administration could rebound from (especially with it's base) when they announce a far crazier right wing nominee.

If I am Bush, I'd withdraw Thursday and take the one day hit, rather than draw through the hearings and have days, even weeks of the media continuing to call him incompetent. Pull her, take the one day hit and come back, as early as next week with a new nominee.

It certainly would sidetrack some of the reporters on the CIA leak case. Taking any of the heat off the administration at this point for those indictments, seems to strategically be the best move possible.

Now as a liberal, fuck him. I hope he does play stupid and let the Miers thing turn into a three week clusterfuck while his boys are all indicted and facing charges. It would be a monumental disaster to play his hand that way.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. It'll happen minutes after Fitz announces the indictments...
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 05:06 AM by Cooley Hurd
...either that, or Op Northwoods II...:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. AG Gonzalez for SCOTUS?
Or is he going to send Robert Bork back up? ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If he withdraws, it would have to be a face saving move with his base
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 05:24 AM by tritsofme
ie Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla Owen, Edith Jones....

They wouldn't stand for another so called "moderate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes. I agree with you.
I just hope that if *bush sends up a RW freak, the Dems have the backbone to vote it down in committee and filibuster it on the Senate floor. Damn the "group of 14" senators who brokered the deal to stop the nuclear option. If * is defending Rove &Cheney for outing CIA agent Plame, the Dems should make a stand. O'Connor could stay there 'til 2009 or just vacate the seat for all I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. If the GOP brings a united front in committee we can't stop that.
But for the first time I think we can reasonably state that the GOP leadership implementing radical changes in rules through the "nuclear option" is very irresponsible, if for no other reason than that their control of the Senate is likely not to last past 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC