Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Overmatch' is Watchword for Future of War, Admiral Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:20 PM
Original message
'Overmatch' is Watchword for Future of War, Admiral Says
WASHINGTON, Oct. 26, 2005 – The military is not interested in fairness when it comes to warfighting, a senior Navy officer said here today.

'Overmatch' is what we want in the future joint force," Navy Adm. Robert F. Willard, vice chief of naval operations, told attendees at the Defense News Media Group's annual Joint Warfare Conference.

"We're not interested in a fair fight, but rather one in which we, and our coalition partners, dominate every domain across every phase of war."

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2005/20051026_3167.html
--------------------------------------------------------------

Overmatch sounds a bit German. cough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say "hubris" is the watchword
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well...winning IS their job after all.
It's up to us civys to find a way to live without war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aimah Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like Carpet Bombing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. "The military is not interested in fairness"
Yeah. We noticed. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. sounds like blitzkrieg
i guess if your gonna fight .. you better win...
but wouldn't all this time, money and effort
be better spent creating peace ??? hmmm??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, fachrissake!!!!
This guy must've slept through Gulf One. Powell named it OVERWHELMING FORCE. And C4 was a big thing for VJCS Owens, lo, those many years ago.

Talk about dusting off an existing strategy and concept, changing the name, tossing in a little extra purple, for joint operations goodness, and trying to pass it off as a new way of thinking!!

That's like the Union soldiers saying they'll call the creatures they were riding steeds instead of horsies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prescole Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't they call it "cakewalk"
before the insurgents proved them wrong?

More like a perp walk, or a yellow cake walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Killing is easier when done from a distance and with impunity.
Heaven forbid we actually risk any of our comforts. Amerika only counts its own soldiers bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. We got those Injuns right where we want 'em boys!
*arrow thuds*

.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC