Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Coincidence Of Timing -- Or A Dog Well Wagged? (Tim Grieve - Salon)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:34 PM
Original message
A Coincidence Of Timing -- Or A Dog Well Wagged? (Tim Grieve - Salon)
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 12:42 PM by VolcanoJen
Salon's Tim Grieve provides four recent, clear examples (including Meirs' withdrawal) that Bush may well have used, and may be continuing to use SCOTUS nominations to deflect the imminent indictments of senior staff officials by Fitzgerald's investigation, as well as his botched response to Hurricane Katrina.

I think Tim's onto something here... and I also think that this time, that dog won't hunt.

www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html
ETA: For some reason, the Salon link isn't posting. Go to salon.com, and then to the War Room section (registration req'd).

July 19, 2005: On the heels of news that, despite prior White House denials, Karl Rove was very much involved in the outing of Valerie Plame, the Washington Post reports that George W. Bush has backtracked on his pledge to fire anyone involved in leaking Plame's identity. Later that day, the president announces that he's nominating John Roberts to replace retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Sept. 5, 2005: Amid mounting criticism of the Bush administration's handling of the response to Hurricane Katrina, the New York Times reports that the White House has put Karl Rove and Dan Bartlett in charge of trying to control the "political damage." Later that day, the president announces that he's nominating John G. Roberts to replace the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

Oct. 2, 2005: As Washington awaits Judy Miller's testimony before Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury, the Washington Post reports that it is becoming "increasingly clear that two of the most powerful men in the Bush administration were more involved in the unmasking of operative Valerie Plame than the White House originally indicated." Early the next morning, the president announces that he's nominating Harriet Miers to a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Oct. 26, 2005: As all of Washington watches, Patrick Fitzgerald meets for three hours with his grand jury and then with the federal judge overseeing his case, leading the Los Angeles Times to speculate that one or more White House officials may be the subjects of sealed indictments. Early the next morning, the president announces that he's withdrawing Harriet Miers' nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. interesting - I like Tim Grieve
thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tin Foil hat time......
My husband and I have noticed events similar to the above during the entire time *has been in office. Here's a tin foil hat theory: Remember the first summer * was in office? All the corporation fraud, theft, whatever....*'s numbers were not very good.....but boy did we unite behind him after 9/11. LIHOP IMO. * just keeps matters stirred up all the time. Enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC