Why wasn't the 2000 election the focus of the GAO investigation/decision?

Dover

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-27-05 05:13 PM
Original message

Why wasn't the 2000 election the focus of the GAO investigation/decision?

This may be a long shot scenario but I just wonder if this new revelation about the illegitimate election will be used at some point to legally remove Bush from office and replace him with the truly elected prez? If that's the case, then by focusing on the 2004 rather than the 2000 election, it would give us Kerry rather than Gore.

So that is why I'm asking the question about why the 2000 election which had just as much corruption involved with it...if not more...is not the focus of these investigations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-27-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message

1. I wish they did focus on both. My take is that their machine fraud was

actually tested and perfected in 2002 elections. So those should be included.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.