Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All it takes is one indictment...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:38 PM
Original message
All it takes is one indictment...
One indictment of one person in the WH opens up a Pandora's Box. There will be charges, hearings, trial, etc.

Said by John Dean on Olberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, one indictment on one person = no contest for that player
The Bush Crime Family will have money put in an unmarked bank account in Qatar, the stooge does his time working on his golf swing and lives in secluded luxury forever after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Or unsaid felon gets whacked.
Yushenkoed maybe or, more preciselay Wellstoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Loyalty, BEFEE will pay the guy for his loyalty don't cha think
Maybe no medal of freedom, but cash.

Now, if you were that Hannah squeally mole, you are right. I would be careful about my soup and I'd stay out of airplanes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dean is the horse's mouth in times like this! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why would anyone perjure oneself if there weren't some wrong
doing on the parts of those for whom lies were told? I do hope those behind the perjury will be indicted as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, the reason for lying,
is to hide the truth. And, as the old saying goes, "He/She who hides something has something to hide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. it seems to me..........
......that lying to a Grand Jury is a pretty big deal!!! I mean, they must've been trying to cover up something that's pretty bad to risk lying to a Grand Jury.

I still think there is much more to this story than we know now......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. testimony under oath, discovery...drooooollllll n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent point!
Because if one person is indicted, he can call witnesses, demand documents, etc. One person can be the key to opening up the answers they have all been concealing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Whatever it takes

"But let justice roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream."

Amos 5:24 (American Standard Version)
American Standard Version (ASV)
Copyright © 1901 Public Domain




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. I disagree. only one indict can too easily be brushed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. If rover gets one indictment, does anyone think...
he'll plead guilty then go to work in the WH?

If he pleads not guilty, then there are hearings and a trial. All of it...Niger, Joe Wilson, his wife, WHIG...could be in a courtroom. If he fights the charges, who do you think they'll bring in as witnesses whether it's for the defense or the prosecution?

I've believed this from the beginning. If an indictment or indictments come down, it's only the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I've heard several people say..........
......if KKKarl is indicted, it would be the responsible thing to resign from his position.

I think if he continues to remain in the same position (after he's indicted) that would bring Bush's poll numbers down even more! I may be wrong but I'm not sure Bush would be willing to take a chance on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can't see him staying after an indictment...
Either way, if he goes the not guilty way, there will be a trial and that can't be good for the bush administration.

If he goes the guilty way, then that would hurt the administration, too. It'll go under a microscope.

The more indictments the better, but even one can have a devastating impact on the bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC