The normally formidable Bush spin machine, which has perfected Orwellian doublespeak to an art form, has obviously been rattled by the Lewis Libby indictment and the whole Valerie Plame affair. The administration’s uncharacteristic and lame response has taken a well-worn page from a public relations playbook: try to change the subject. It has pursued this strategy by speeding up the selection and announcement of the Supreme Court nominee of the month. But this mere diversion might actually signal that the White House has done something wrong. Furthermore, trying to change the subject shows weakness that could embolden critics. That’s the kind of response one would expect from a weak-kneed Clinton administration. Remember the U.S. cruise missile attacks on Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998 on the day that Monica Lewinsky was testifying before the grand jury? The Bush administration would never want to be caught dead imitating the Clinton administration’s “small thinking.”
No, we expect more from the Bush administration. We expect the same grandiosity and flamboyance shown during the debacle in Iraq. In December 2004, in the midst of the chaos of the post-invasion occupation of Iraq, the president awarded the Medal of Freedom—one of the nation’s two top civilian awards—to Gen. Tommy Franks, intelligence director George Tenet, and U.S. viceroy Paul Bremer. Although General Franks got his army to Baghdad with due haste, he threw out his predecessor’s contingency plan for an occupation of Iraq and didn’t do much planning of his own for that eventuality. George Tenet looked the other way while Bush administration politicos turned murky intelligence on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction into the hysterical propaganda that Saddam Hussein was about ready to obtain a nuclear weapon. Finally, Paul Bremer, the administration’s pick to run occupied Iraq, made the horrendous blunders of demobilizing the Iraqi army and purging Baathist party members down to the mid-level of the Iraqi bureaucracy. These actions eliminated expertise that might have been useful in dampening the chaos of post-war Iraq and created enemies that already had the skills and now had the motive to fight U.S. forces.
The awards ceremony where those medals were presented resembled those held in the old Soviet Union, where senior officials took turns pinning medals on each other’s chests while Soviet forces in the field were taking a drubbing from a bunch of ragtag Afghan guerrillas. Giving medals to Franks, Tenet, and Bremer was the ultimate chutzpah in the face of an impending disaster in Iraq. The administration faces a comparable calamity in the Plame affair.
So why not be brash, play offense instead of defense, and give Libby, Rove and Cheney medals? So what if Libby probably compromised a U.S. intelligence operative’s secret identity, may have gotten U.S. friends overseas killed, undermined the willingness of future friends to provide information to the United States, and lied to cover it all up? And what if Libby’s pal, Karl Rove, probably did the same thing? And isn’t it hard to imagine that Vice President Cheney was not directing the effort to discredit Wilson’s findings by outing his wife? Cheney is known to have sharp elbows, led the charge into Iraq, was unduly interested in Plame’s place of employment, and, coincidentally, discussed the Plame affair with Libby on two occasions shortly before Libby’s disclosures to reporters that Plame worked for the CIA.
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1101-33.htm
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
