|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
WatchWhatISay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:11 AM Original message |
Just what are they protecting us from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. One name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firefox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. It is all a protection racket at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It's the old "Throw a rock through their window |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Great question!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. Certainly not from themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 02:45 AM Response to Original message |
6. He operates by terrorizing us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 03:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. Well, then make some vaccine instead of talking about quarantines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 04:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. tami Flu is NOT a vaccine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 04:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. So make some more Tamiflu then! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-02-05 04:22 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. that is why the WHO is leaning on ROCHE heavily to licence it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC