|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
revree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:34 AM Original message |
Fitzgerald One of Them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. The proof will be in the pudding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, at first I thought Fitzgerald was just slow, but now I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jrthin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. He had to take the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. I dunno... we may not want to push this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Punkingal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. He sure doesn't talk and act like one of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
6. I doubt it would have got this far if it were run by a Bushie insider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I agree. Fitz seems to have unimpeachable credentials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogfacedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
8. Fitzgerald was also given this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. No, I don't believe so. He's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam_laddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
10. perhaps I'm in error here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. You are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Succinctly Stated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It also requires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. You are confusing Special Prosecutor with Independent Counsel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Fitzgerald is a "Special Counsel" and is subject to 28 CFR § 600.3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
11. I Think Rory O'Connor Has Half Truths & Innuendo Going On There |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
16. And the Judge for Libby's case.....picked by GHWB!!! CONFLICT!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
17. Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 600.3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Writer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-04-05 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. My thought? Rory needs to grow up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC