Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean: Criminal ChargesThat May Arise From the Plame Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 10:51 AM
Original message
John Dean: Criminal ChargesThat May Arise From the Plame Scandal
John Dean says that under the federal conspiracy statute the realization that one is breaking the law ("leaking classified information") need not exist. This point alone negates McClellan's carefully constructed technical loophole from Friday's press conference.

According to Dean, under this statute, if you join a conspiracy already in progress and share in its purpose (pushing the leak), you can be held responsible for all that has gone on before you joined.

The conspiracy in this case would be a conspiracy to defraud - undertaking actions that are not within the scope of your employment. Thus anyone in this administration who made phone calls to reporters to further the story of Plame's identity would be in violation of this statute. As Dean states, "fraud" under this statute is simply defined as "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of any department of government."

Although it would be nice to actually find the leaker, that is not likely to happen with these criminals. However, using the facts that Wilson himself has been touting regarding the "two wave" structure of this crime - the leak itself and then the PUSHING of this information, it may actually be possible that we might see some major damage to some major players.

Not only should Rove get James Baker as his lawyer, but methinks Chris Matthews is going to need some serious help soon as he is the one, according to Newsweek, that called Wilson and said, "I just got off the phone with Karl Rove, who said your wife was fair game."

Tweety's got a lot of 'splainin to do, unless of course, he decides to suicide himself!

Here's the Dean article -

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20031010.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Red_Viking Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I still say: Don't f*ck with the Spooks
These folks know what they're doing. We haven't seen the last of it. Bushco may try to sweep it under the rug, but that won't happen. I firmly believe the CIA would not have asked for the investigation if they didn't have an ace up their sleeve.

Maybe it's wishful thinking, but I want to see the douchebags who did this brought low.

RV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. RV, you are so right. The CIA calling for an investigation says it all.
They have something and they aren't going to back off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. "fraud" under this statute is simply defined
Yet, this story is already losing its legs. I think people would be willing to watch it but our esteemed media seems to have decided that lions in apartments and the Kobe rapre trial should occupy our iar time... It should be a slam dunk case, but our justice dept run by our very own Goebbels isn't interested in pushing for an independent prosecutor.

I do hope that when we get a dem back in the office all this crap gets investigated and criiminal charges are filed against all that rotten cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. I always heard that ignorance of the law was no excuse
Glad to hear that no one can cry ignorance (of the law or their act) on this one and get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the CIA does not continue with this story
then this country can say good-bye to any good intelligence.

Remember how the RW were screaming after 9/11 that this was the fault of Clinton and Dems in the past because they did not put a lot of emphasis on "human" intelligence?

Well, this one act of treason by this WH has totally wiped out any and all human intelligence we may or might have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoKingGeorge Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. TWO are guilty of acts of Treason , 5 journalists culpable..
There are TWO people making calls so that is two who are outing Mrs.Wilson. John Dean here shows how at least 5 journalists are probably guilty of no less than joining a conspiricy.

The TWO are not leakers. They are Traitors to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC